세계를 수집하다: ‘物’에 대한 인식의 역사와 明代 출판물 속의 博物學
Collecting the World: Natural Histories Described in the Publications of Ming Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main purpose of study is to examine the ways to suggest ‘things(物)’ in texts of pre-modern period of China and the meaning of changes. How ‘things(物)’ are perceived and interpreted is one of important issues in terms of history of thought and history of scholarship since Great Learning(≪大學≫). Scholars had different interpretation about their academic purpose of ‘gewuzhizhi (investigating things and extending knowledge, 格物致知)’ and there used to be each different knowledge depending on ages. Previously, ‘Natural Histories(博物學)’ accumulated by individual knowledge about specific objects are an important studying method of intellects. However, intellects since ‘xin ruxue(新儒學)’ of Song Dynasty had a purpose of studying ‘universal principal(窮理)’ which penetrate the space and the whole of creation. Publications about natural histories like an encyclopedia consistently appeared. Among these publications about natural histories, though there were cases that perception of phenomenological ‘things(物)’ and broad learning(博學) were given serious consideration, many intellects since Ming dynasty tried to find the context which penetrated things rather than to collect and classify individual knowledge. In this case, ‘things’ was structured by language and incorporated into human history. Historicization of ‘things’ was established by premise of ascendancy of language. However, from the late Ming dynasty, the change of intellects’ affairs and things(事物) perception started to emerge. Language was mobilized for description of individual things. Naturalists collected, classified, and described individual objects rather than explored ‘universal principal(窮理).’ Though language was inevitably required in this process, the relation between language and objects was reversed. Language in publications like Bencaogangmu(≪本草綱目≫) or Tiangongkaiwu(≪天工開物≫) was downgraded as an instrumental existence for things. It was rearranged from perspective of values for human as an individual, out of 格致(investigating things and extending knowledge) concept on the basis of ‘Learning of the Way(道學)’ in search of moral completion and consensus, naturalists of the late Ming dynasty. It can be called a new perception about things between social meanings and objects Ming dynasty.
Abstract
The main purpose of study is to examine the ways to suggest ‘things(物)’ in texts of pre-modern period of China and the meaning of changes. How ‘things(物)’ are perceived and interpreted is one of important issues in terms of history of thought and history of scholarship since Great Learning(≪大學≫). Scholars had different interpretation about their academic purpose of ‘gewuzhizhi (investigating things and extending knowledge, 格物致知)’ and there used to be each different knowledge depending on ages. Previously, ‘Natural Histories(博物學)’ accumulated by individual knowledge about specific objects are an important studying method of intellects. However, intellects since ‘xin ruxue(新儒學)’ of Song Dynasty had a purpose of studying ‘universal principal(窮理)’ which penetrate the space and the whole of creation. Publications about natural histories like an encyclopedia consistently appeared. Among these publications about natural histories, though there were cases that perception of phenomenological ‘things(物)’ and broad learning(博學) were given serious consideration, many intellects since Ming dynasty tried to find the context which penetrated things rather than to collect and classify individual knowledge. In this case, ‘things’ was structured by language and incorporated into human history. Historicization of ‘things’ was established by premise of ascendancy of language. However, from the late Ming dynasty, the change of intellects’ affairs and things(事物) perception started to emerge. Language was mobilized for description of individual things. Naturalists collected, classified, and described individual objects rather than explored ‘universal principal(窮理).’ Though language was inevitably required in this process, the relation between language and objects was reversed. Language in publications like Bencaogangmu(≪本草綱目≫) or Tiangongkaiwu(≪天工開物≫) was downgraded as an instrumental existence for things. It was rearranged from perspective of values for human as an individual, out of 格致(investigating things and extending knowledge) concept on the basis of ‘Learning of the Way(道學)’ in search of moral completion and consensus, naturalists of the late Ming dynasty. It can be called a new perception about things between social meanings and objects Ming dynasty.
참고문헌 (34)
- 李昉, "太平御覽" (1995), 中華書局
- ""埤雅", 益雅堂叢書本"[URL]
- ""事物紀原", 미국 Washington대학 소장본"[URL]
- 罗颀, "物原" (1967), 藝文印書館
- 王三聘, "古今事物考" (1973), 臺灣商務印書館
- ""古今事物考", 關中叢書本"[URL]
- ""本草綱目", 欽定四庫全書本"[URL]
- 宋應星, "天工開物" (1975), 臺灣商務印書館
- "≪天工開物≫, 喜詠軒叢書本"[URL]
- 張秀民, "中國印刷史" (2006), 浙江古籍出版社
- 葛兆光, "≪中國思想史≫第二卷" (2007), 復旦大學出版社
- 황지영, "明淸출판과 조선 전파" (2012), 시간의 물레
- 구가 가쓰토시, "지식의 분류사" (2009), 한국출판마케팅연구소
- 마노 센류, "주자와 왕양명 – 신유학과≪대학≫의 이념" (2010), 학고방
- 미셸 푸코, "말과 사물" (2012), 민음사
- 요시미 순야, "박람회, 근대의 시선" (2004), 논형
- 토머스 메츠거, "곤경의 탈피" (2014), 민음사
- 티모시 브룩, "쾌락의 혼돈 : 중국 명대의 상업과 문화" (2005), 도서출판 이산
- Edward W. Said, "오리엔탈리즘" (1994), 교보문고
- Craig Clunas, "Superfluous things: material culture and social status in early modern China" (2004), University of Hawaii Press
- Paula Findlen, "Possessing Nature – Museum, Collecting, and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy" (1996), University of California Press
- Benjamin A. Elman, "On Their Terms: Science in China, 1550-1900" (2005), Harvard Univ. Press
- 김지선, "《博物志》에서의 공간의 의미", 중국어문학지, (12), pp.3~82 (2002), 중국어문학회
- 김지선, "≪長物志≫에 나타난 明末 사대부의 내면세계", 중국학논총, (42), pp.133~156 (2013), 중국학연구소
- 문정진, "物의 槪念과 空間―格致와 科學, 그 사이의 言表와 談論을 중심으로", 중국문학, 75, pp.51~71 (2013), 한국중국어문학회
- 박성규, "격물치지 개념의 연원", 규장각, 24 (2001)
- 손수영, "類書 ≪太平廣記≫의 자리 ― “小說” 인식의 전환점", 중국어문학논집, (12) (1999)
- 안상우, "本草書의 系統과 本草學 發展史", 한국의사학회지, 18(2), pp.39~54 (2005), 한국의사학회
- 이은상, "명말 강남 문인들의 물질문화 담론에 관한 試論", 중국학, (36), pp.185~207 (2010), 대한중국학회
- 정재서, "원유; 帝國 敍事의 空間", 중국문학, 38, pp.1~16 (2002), 한국중국어문학회
- 최수경, "明代 後期 상업출판물 속의 ‘物’- ‘爭奇’ 시리즈를 중심으로", 중어중문학, (60), pp.3~42 (2015), 한국중어중문학회
- 홍상훈, "제도적 글쓰기로서 漢賦 ― 초보적 문학 양식의 시험", 중국문학, 43, pp.19~36 (2005), 한국중국어문학회
- 艾爾曼, "金錢萬能: 明淸間中國帝制晩期的商業, 經傳與品位", 中國史硏究, (4) (2009)
- 艾爾曼, "收集與分類: 明代匯編與類書", 學術月刊, 41 (2009)
