중국어와 한국어 신체어 ‘눈’의 의미 확장 대조 연구
Meaning Extension of the Body-part Term, ‘Eye’, between Chinese and Korean
2
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Body-part terms do not just mean our body parts but are used in a range of areas in our daily life. From the viewpoint of cognitive linguistics, conceptual metaphor and conceptual metonymy play a representative role in the process of extending meaning of body-part terms, which is calculated from the relationship between similarity and adjacency. The study investigated what concepts ‘eye’, one of the most important body parts, hold in Chinese and Korean each and how it is used to be expressed in language; also, metaphorical transfer of the conceptual domain by Heine et al was used to study how the meaning is extended. As a result of the comparison, the meaning of the Chinese body-part term ‘眼/目’ has been extended in the order of man ＞ animal ＞ plant ＞ object ＞ action ＞ space ＞ time ＞ quantity ＞ abstraction area, while the Korean ‘눈’ has been extended in the order of man ＞ animal ＞ plant ＞ object ＞ action ＞ space ＞ time ＞ abstraction area. This resulted from linking the characteristics of familiar body parts to different concepts; it was revealed that language is deeply related to recognition and physical experience of human being. As for meaning extension, functional characteristics take the biggest proportion, followed by morphological characteristics, structural characteristics and positional characteristics. Speakers with different language and cultural backgrounds see the same object in a different point of view, and this may result in unique and its own meaning extension for Chinese and Korean each by highlighting different aspects. For example, differences are shown in plant, object, time and quantity domains. As for morphological characteristics of the word: first, as some Chinese words have different meanings in a single form, ‘眼’ shows grammatical metonymy that it is used as a unit noun; meanwhile, Korean has no such phenomenon. Second, the meaning extension in Chinese is mainly complex forms, but that in Korean is usually a single form; this reveals that Chinese has comprehensive meanings, while Korean is very flexible and highly depends on the context.
Abstract
Body-part terms do not just mean our body parts but are used in a range of areas in our daily life. From the viewpoint of cognitive linguistics, conceptual metaphor and conceptual metonymy play a representative role in the process of extending meaning of body-part terms, which is calculated from the relationship between similarity and adjacency. The study investigated what concepts ‘eye’, one of the most important body parts, hold in Chinese and Korean each and how it is used to be expressed in language; also, metaphorical transfer of the conceptual domain by Heine et al was used to study how the meaning is extended. As a result of the comparison, the meaning of the Chinese body-part term ‘眼/目’ has been extended in the order of man ＞ animal ＞ plant ＞ object ＞ action ＞ space ＞ time ＞ quantity ＞ abstraction area, while the Korean ‘눈’ has been extended in the order of man ＞ animal ＞ plant ＞ object ＞ action ＞ space ＞ time ＞ abstraction area. This resulted from linking the characteristics of familiar body parts to different concepts; it was revealed that language is deeply related to recognition and physical experience of human being. As for meaning extension, functional characteristics take the biggest proportion, followed by morphological characteristics, structural characteristics and positional characteristics. Speakers with different language and cultural backgrounds see the same object in a different point of view, and this may result in unique and its own meaning extension for Chinese and Korean each by highlighting different aspects. For example, differences are shown in plant, object, time and quantity domains. As for morphological characteristics of the word: first, as some Chinese words have different meanings in a single form, ‘眼’ shows grammatical metonymy that it is used as a unit noun; meanwhile, Korean has no such phenomenon. Second, the meaning extension in Chinese is mainly complex forms, but that in Korean is usually a single form; this reveals that Chinese has comprehensive meanings, while Korean is very flexible and highly depends on the context.
참고문헌 (26)
- 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
- 김미형, "인지적 대조언어학의 방법론 연구: 한국어와 영어를 대상으로" (2009), 한국문화사
- 곽재용, "초등학교 국어교과서에 나타난 신체어 연구", 어문학, 67, pp.1~32 (1999)
- 남혜현, "신체화에 따른 의미확장 연구: 러시아어 신체어를 중심으로", 노어노문학, 19(3), pp.3~28 (2007), 한국노어노문학회
- 남혜현, "러시아어 신체어의 의미확장 연구:이목구비 신체어를 중심으로", 슬라브어 연구, 12, pp.135~158 (2007), 한국슬라브어학회
- 노양진, "삶으로서의 은유" (2006), 박이정
- 박종갑, "한국어와 베트남어의 다의어 대조 연구- 몇몇 신체어를 대상으로 하여", 어문학, (96), pp.51~86 (2007), 한국어문학회
- 배도용, "우리말 신체어의 의미 확장 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2001
- 배도용, "다의어 ‘눈’의 의미 확장 연구", 담화와 인지, 9(1), pp.51~76 (2002), 담화·인지언어학회
- 이기우, "인지의미론" (1994), 한국 문화사
- 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2008), 한국문화사
- 鄭米淑, "신체어 ‘눈’에 관한 어휘의미론적 한중대조", 석사, 중국어, pp.1999
- 周子又, "한·중 신체어의 다의성 대비 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2011
- 한글학회, "우리말 큰사전" (1992), 어문각
- 홍사만, "신체어의 다의구조 분석(Ⅵ): 인간 반응어로서의 신체어 관용구", 어문론총, (28), pp.125~163 (1994)
- 胡方芳, "现代汉语转喻的认知研究", 博士, pp.2008
- 陆俭明, "关于词的兼类问题", 中国语文, (1) (1994)
- 齐沪扬, "现代汉语空间问题研究" (1998), 学林出版社
- 沈家炫, "转指与转喻", 当代语言学, (1) (1994)
- 束定芳, "论隐喻的基本类型及句法和予以特徵", 外国语, (1) (2000)
- 王寅, "认知语言学" (2006), 上海外语教育出版社
- 魏在江, "时间转喻的体验哲学基础及其认知特徵", 外语教学理论与实践, (4) (2013)
- 赵学德, "认知视角下人体词的语义转移研究" (2014), 国防工业出版社
- 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室, "现代汉语词典" (2012), 商务印书馆
- 朱晓军, "空间范畴的认知语义研究", 博士, pp.2008
- 邹邵华, "求真集" (2004), 生活⋅读书⋅新知叁联书店