鲁认旅明文献及其文化交流上的意义
Study on Culture Exchanging between China and Korea in Ro In’s Record when He Traveled China of Ming Dynasty
6
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Gumge Corpus(≪锦溪先生文集≫) and Gumge Diary(≪锦溪日记≫) written by Ro, In(鲁认) are important parts of the Chinese documents wrote in foreign country late Ming Dynasty, which highlight the Sino-Korean cultural exchange through civil and regional perspectives. This Korean scholar’s experience, traveling around China, was accurately recorded by both his miscellany and detailed diary, while the rest of the corpus recorded the communication between the author and various sectors of society in Fujian(福建) and other surrounding areas, especially the raw materials about his talking with Confucian scholars and literati in locally. Comparing with the Jocheonrok(≪朝天录≫) and Yeonhangrok(≪燕行录≫), whose historical materials mainly reflected the Sino-Korean cultural communication condition from national and central perspective, and obviously the official characteristic of these materials was extremely strong. Ro, In, with the identity of exile Confucian, came to China, driving the local and folk culture communication process more and deeper, owing to the high degree of freedom.
Abstract
Gumge Corpus(≪锦溪先生文集≫) and Gumge Diary(≪锦溪日记≫) written by Ro, In(鲁认) are important parts of the Chinese documents wrote in foreign country late Ming Dynasty, which highlight the Sino-Korean cultural exchange through civil and regional perspectives. This Korean scholar’s experience, traveling around China, was accurately recorded by both his miscellany and detailed diary, while the rest of the corpus recorded the communication between the author and various sectors of society in Fujian(福建) and other surrounding areas, especially the raw materials about his talking with Confucian scholars and literati in locally. Comparing with the Jocheonrok(≪朝天录≫) and Yeonhangrok(≪燕行录≫), whose historical materials mainly reflected the Sino-Korean cultural communication condition from national and central perspective, and obviously the official characteristic of these materials was extremely strong. Ro, In, with the identity of exile Confucian, came to China, driving the local and folk culture communication process more and deeper, owing to the high degree of freedom.
참고문헌 (34)
- 蔡清, "读蜀阜存稿私记", 四库全书总目 卷一百七十一, 集部二十四≪虚齐集≫, ~
- 陈名实, "闽臺儒学源流" (2008), 福建人民出版社
- 陈淳, "景印文渊阁四库全书" (1986), 臺湾商务印书馆
- 陈真晟, "布衣陈先生存藁", 程朱正学纂要ㆍ心学图说, ~
- 成海应, "韩国文集丛刊 第273-279册" (1991), 景仁文化社
- 程顥, "二程集" (2004), 中华书局
- 何乔远, "闽书" (1994), 福建人民出版社
- 李廷龟, "韩国歷代文集丛书 第235-240册" (1999), 景仁文化社
- 李滉, "韩国歷代文集丛书 第81册" (1999), 景仁文化社
- 李岩, "明万歷年间朝鲜人鲁认的＜锦溪日记＞研究", 硕士, pp.2015
- 柳成龙, "韩国文集丛刊 第52册" (1992), 景仁文化社
- 鲁认, "韩国歷代文集丛书 第2281册" (1999), 景仁文化社
- 朴齐家, "韩国文集丛刊 第261册" (1991), 景仁文化社
- 朴趾源, "韩国歷代文集丛书 第2457-2459册" (1999), 景仁文化社
- 许筠, "韩国文集丛刊 第74册" (1991), 景仁文化社
- 谢旻, "江西通誌" (2013), 商务印书馆
- 王鑫磊, "同文书史——从韩国汉文献看近世中国" (2016), 复旦大学出版社
- 朱熹, "朱文公文集" (1989), 上海书店
- 朱熹, "朱子语类" (1981), 中华书局
- 内藤隽辅, "文禄庆长役にねける被掳人の研究" (1977), 东京大学出版会
- 李贞周, "鲁认의 ＜锦溪日记＞硏究", 硕士, pp.2004
- 王亚楠, "壬辰倭乱时期俘虏体验文学研究——以＜看羊录＞,＜锦溪日记＞, ＜月峰海上录＞为中心", 硕士, pp.2014
- 김미선, "임진왜란 포로의 일본 체험 실기 고찰", 한국시가문화연구, (25), pp.25~53 (2010), 한국시가문화학회
- 金仙熙, "从十七世纪初期李朝知识分子的拘留记看他者形象—以姜沆≪看羊录≫, 郑希得 ≪海上录≫, 鲁认≪锦溪日记≫为中心", 大学纪要 (2001), 广岛大学
- 金英善, "노인(鲁认)의 ≪금계집(锦溪集)≫과 실기류(实记类) 비교를 통해 본 조선 후기 문집의 위상", 渊民学志, 21 (2014)
- 金镇圭, "임란 포로 일기 연구: ≪금계일기≫를 중심으로", 새얼語文論集, 10 (1997)
- 刘彩延, "壬辰倭乱中被掳人和他们的记录—以姜沆, 郑希得, 鲁认为中心", 人文科学研究, 33 (2012)
- 朴永焕, "鲁认≪锦溪日记≫里记载的闽文化—以学术思想, 书院文化以及科举制度为中心", 2012闽南文化国际学术研讨会论文集 (2012), 国立成功大学
- 朴永焕, "鲁认≪锦溪日记≫里的诗歌研究", 韩国学论文集, 21 (2012), 北京大学韩国学研究中心
- 朴永焕, "汉学范式与中国问题研究专场论文及摘要集" (2014), 北京大学出版社
- 帅倩, "一位被俘入倭的朝鲜人与明代福建官员学人之交往", 海交史研究, (1) (2016)
- 长节子, "朝鲜役における明福建军门の岛津氏工作─｢锦溪日记｣より─", 朝鲜学报, 42 (1967)
- "≪锦溪先生文集≫解题"[URL]
- 韩国民族文化促进会, "民族文化文库刊行会 1974~1981年, 编号26", 韩国古典综合DB