본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

광야의 상징성에 관한 小考 ― 이육사의<曠野>와 穆旦의 <在曠野上>을 중심으로

A Study on the Symbolism of the Wilderness: Focusing on “Wilderness” of Lee Yuksa and “In the Wilderness” of Mu Dan

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Lee Yuksa and Mu Dan were poets who created poetry in Korea and China respectively in the common time of 1930s and early 1940s. Both Lee Yuksa and Mu Dan share the image of ‘Wilderness’ by writing the poem “The Wilderness (광야)” and “In the Wilderness (在曠野上)”. Since the mid 1930s, there have been many poems with the title of ‘The Wilderness’ in Korea and Japan. However, while many were meant to serve the strategy of Japan’s permanent occupation of Manchuria, the “wilderness” of Lee Yuksa and Mu Dan were clearly different from that which the poetry titled “Wilderness”. What made the poets who lived in two different spaces dream about the same space called “Wilderness”? The tragic perception of the world, unable to compromise with the world, led the two poets to a “wilderness” as a space where they could open their inner freedom. The “wilderness” as a place to get freedom of thought has utopian character. However, the acquisition of Utopia was not easy to obtain or dream of two poets. In the case of Lee Yuksa, the utopia through thorough self-sacrifice was left in the future, and Mu Dan frustrated about utopia after thorough criticism of reality.

Abstract

Lee Yuksa and Mu Dan were poets who created poetry in Korea and China respectively in the common time of 1930s and early 1940s. Both Lee Yuksa and Mu Dan share the image of ‘Wilderness’ by writing the poem “The Wilderness (광야)” and “In the Wilderness (在曠野上)”. Since the mid 1930s, there have been many poems with the title of ‘The Wilderness’ in Korea and Japan. However, while many were meant to serve the strategy of Japan’s permanent occupation of Manchuria, the “wilderness” of Lee Yuksa and Mu Dan were clearly different from that which the poetry titled “Wilderness”. What made the poets who lived in two different spaces dream about the same space called “Wilderness”? The tragic perception of the world, unable to compromise with the world, led the two poets to a “wilderness” as a space where they could open their inner freedom. The “wilderness” as a place to get freedom of thought has utopian character. However, the acquisition of Utopia was not easy to obtain or dream of two poets. In the case of Lee Yuksa, the utopia through thorough self-sacrifice was left in the future, and Mu Dan frustrated about utopia after thorough criticism of reality.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 이육사, "범우비평한국문학22⋅광야(외)" (2005), 범우사
  2. 이육사, "광야에서 부르리라" (1981), 문학세계사
  3. 박현수, "원전주해 이육사 시전집" (2008), 예옥
  4. 穆 旦, "穆旦詩文集" (2014), 人民文學出版社
  5. 穆 旦, "穆旦" (2000), 華夏出版社
  6. 穆 旦, "穆旦詩集" (2000), 人民文學出版事
  7. 이선옥, "穆旦詩選" (2003), 문이재
  8. 가스통 바슐라르, "공간의 시학" (2003), 동문선
  9. 가라타니 고진, "근대문학의 종언" (2016), 도서출판 b
  10. 권정우, "우리 시를 읽는 즐거움" (2002), 북갤럽
  11. 김희곤, "새로 쓰는 이육사 평전" (2000), 지영사
  12. 에밀 슈타이거, "시학의 근본개념" (1978), 삼중당
  13. 이승훈, "문학과 시간" (1983), 삼우출판사
  14. 한국근현대사연구회, "한국독립운동사강의" (1998), 도서출판 한울
  15. 孫玉石, "中國現代詩導讀(穆旦卷)" (2007), 北京大學出版社
  16. 楊經建, "20世紀中國存在主義文學史論" (2014), 人民出版社
  17. 김소현, "充實과 空虛 사이에서 - 40년대 穆旦의 시", 中國現代文學, (17) (1999)
  18. 김소현, "穆旦 시의 現代性", 中國人文科學, 14 (1995)
  19. 김점용, "이육사 시의 숭고미", 한국시학연구, (17), pp.31~51 (2006), 한국시학회
  20. 김춘식, "근대시의 이념과 시적 윤리 - 이육사 시의 서정성과 윤리성 -", 배달말, (56), pp.261~287 (2015), 배달말학회
  21. 박순원, "이육사의 「광야」 연구", 비평문학, (40), pp.89~115 (2011), 한국비평문학회
  22. 박호영, "이육사의 <광야>에 대한 실증적 접근", 한국시학연구, (5), pp.93~106 (2001), 한국시학회
  23. 심원섭, "1930년대 한ㆍ일 ‘광야(曠野)’ 표제의 시 연구", 현대문학의 연구, (37), pp.355~384 (2009), 한국문학연구학회[DOI]
  24. 李先玉, "穆旦의 詩: 曠野의 상처 입은 野獸", 中國現代文學, (21) (2001)
  25. 황정산, "이육사 시의 시적 화자와 아이러니", 한국문예비평연구, (42), pp.309~326 (2013), 한국현대문예비평학회[DOI]
  26. 王光明, "“新的抒情” : 讓情感浸透智力", 廣東社會科學, (1) (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)