본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

19세기 조선 문인의 중국소설 독서와 비평 — 洪奭周 一家와 李圭景을 중심으로

Reading and Criticism of Chinese Novels by 19th-Century Joseon Dynasty Literati

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Based on the fact that there were about 400 Chinese novels published, translated, and distributed in the Joseon Dynasty, changes in the Chinese novel view by period were examined, and in the process, various reviews criticized Chinese novels were collected and summarized. In this paper, based on the reading and criticism of Chinese classical novels by Joseon writers in the 19th century, Joseon writers are conducting research to find out through which process they read and distributed them, and further how they criticized them. Compared to the criticism of Chinese classical novels and Korean classical novels that poured out in the 18th century, the content of the 19th century is relatively small and the content is simple. It may be because Joseon Dynasty writers in the 19th century did not enjoy reading Chinese novels and writing feelings and impressions, but sometimes created themselves. As such, it is also worth examining how the society and culture of the late Joseon Dynasty affected when Joseon writers moved on from reading Chinese classical novels to creating. In the course of this study, I visited the library of East Asia at the University of Berkeley in the U.S. During the Joseon Dynasty, writers not only read and appreciate books, but also selected their own books, selected sentences, bridged and criticized, and published books themselves. In addition, in the 19th century, it was assumed that Joseon writers moved away from the framework of reading to creation in Chinese novels, so it was worth examining the impact of society and culture in the late Joseon Dynasty, so they are collecting data for the study. I think this visit to the East Asian Library at the University of Berkeley in the U.S. was an opportunity to inspire interest and enthusiasm for research in old books. In the course of this study, it was possible to find evidence that interest in Korea-China comparative literature and Korea-China cultural exchange took place in various fields from book exchanges to direct communication and academic exchanges of writers. Continuing this research process, it can be seen that Chinese novels were not excluded in the past when writers of the Joseon Dynasty gained knowledge through reading and examined their views. Through the criticism of Chinese classical novels, you can not only compare the criticism of Korean-Chinese novels, but also understand the worldview of writers at the time and point out the context of the values of the historical and cultural times. At that time, the study of Chinese novels, reading, and criticism, as well as writing methods, needed to be interested in Chinese literature and East Asian history and culture research, so we will proceed with this study in a wider and in-depth to enhance academic value.

Abstract

Based on the fact that there were about 400 Chinese novels published, translated, and distributed in the Joseon Dynasty, changes in the Chinese novel view by period were examined, and in the process, various reviews criticized Chinese novels were collected and summarized. In this paper, based on the reading and criticism of Chinese classical novels by Joseon writers in the 19th century, Joseon writers are conducting research to find out through which process they read and distributed them, and further how they criticized them. Compared to the criticism of Chinese classical novels and Korean classical novels that poured out in the 18th century, the content of the 19th century is relatively small and the content is simple. It may be because Joseon Dynasty writers in the 19th century did not enjoy reading Chinese novels and writing feelings and impressions, but sometimes created themselves. As such, it is also worth examining how the society and culture of the late Joseon Dynasty affected when Joseon writers moved on from reading Chinese classical novels to creating. In the course of this study, I visited the library of East Asia at the University of Berkeley in the U.S. During the Joseon Dynasty, writers not only read and appreciate books, but also selected their own books, selected sentences, bridged and criticized, and published books themselves. In addition, in the 19th century, it was assumed that Joseon writers moved away from the framework of reading to creation in Chinese novels, so it was worth examining the impact of society and culture in the late Joseon Dynasty, so they are collecting data for the study. I think this visit to the East Asian Library at the University of Berkeley in the U.S. was an opportunity to inspire interest and enthusiasm for research in old books. In the course of this study, it was possible to find evidence that interest in Korea-China comparative literature and Korea-China cultural exchange took place in various fields from book exchanges to direct communication and academic exchanges of writers. Continuing this research process, it can be seen that Chinese novels were not excluded in the past when writers of the Joseon Dynasty gained knowledge through reading and examined their views. Through the criticism of Chinese classical novels, you can not only compare the criticism of Korean-Chinese novels, but also understand the worldview of writers at the time and point out the context of the values of the historical and cultural times. At that time, the study of Chinese novels, reading, and criticism, as well as writing methods, needed to be interested in Chinese literature and East Asian history and culture research, so we will proceed with this study in a wider and in-depth to enhance academic value.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 簡鎬允, "韓國古小說批評硏究" (2002), 景仁文化社
  2. 韩国古小说研究会, "古小说의 著作과 传播" (1994), 亚细亚文化社
  3. 柳鐸一, "韓國古小說批評資料集成" (1994), 아세아문화사
  4. 무악고소설자료연구회, "한국고소설관련자료집Ⅰ⋅Ⅱ" (2005), 태학사
  5. 민관동, "中國古典小說在韓國之傳播" (1998), 中國上海學林出版社
  6. 민관동, "中國古典小說史料叢考" (2001), 아세아문화사
  7. 민관동, "中國古典小說批評資料叢考" (2003), 학고방
  8. 박재연, "고어대사전21책" (2016), 선문대출판부
  9. 김선희, "19세기 지식장의 변동과 문명의식: 홍한주, 이규경, 최한기를 중심으로", 한국사상사학, (49), pp.207~252 (2015), 한국사상사학회
  10. 이상용, "「홍씨독서록」수록 서적의 선정기준에 대한 연구", 서지학연구, (30), pp.247~281 (2005), 한국서지학회
  11. 박계화, "명(明), 청(淸) 문학에 대한 조선후기 문인들의 인식: 18세기 조선(朝鮮) 문인(文人)이 본 중국염정소설(中國艶情小說) ― ≪欽英≫을 중심으로", 대동문화연구 (2014)
  12. 박무영, "홍석주의 지리적 상상력: ‘노정표’ 만드는 사람", 고전문학연구, (38), pp.179~211 (2010), 한국고전문학회[DOI]
  13. 송호빈, "<廣寒樓記>의 金聖嘆 極微論 수용 양상: 비평 및 개작의식의 반영과 관련하여", 민족문화, 32(32), pp.275~296 (2008), 한국고전번역원[DOI]
  14. 윤병주, "19세기 중엽 이규경(李圭景)의 학풍과 사상", 한국학보, 75 (1994)
  15. 이승수, "<三韓拾遺>의 기술 방식 세 가지", 고소설연구, (15), pp.6~166 (2003), 한국고소설학회
  16. 장예준, "명(明)‧청(淸)대 평점(評點) 소설 비교를 통한 조선(朝鮮) 후기 평점 소설의 특성 연구 - 『서상기(西廂記)』와 <광한루기(廣寒樓記)> 평점 비교를 중심으로 -", 열상고전연구, (51), pp.251~299 (2016), 열상고전연구회[DOI]
  17. 정우봉, "버클리대 소장 詩文選集의 자료적 가치와 의의", 민족문화연구, (54), pp.153~184 (2011), 민족문화연구원
  18. 조영래, "『사고전서총목제요』의 「범례」를 통한 『홍씨독서록』 서지분석의 범주 연구 - 『홍씨독서록』 「史部」를 중심으로 -", 서지학연구, (61), pp.201~230 (2015), 한국서지학회[DOI]
  19. 진재교, "19세기 京華世族의 讀書文化 -洪奭周 家門을 중심으로-", 漢文學報, 16(1), pp.137~168 (2007), 우리한문학회
  20. 최식, "藏書家 沈宜平의 文藝活動과 編著 -『三家文存』과 『怡餘畧存』을 중심으로-", 동방한문학, (54), pp.193~220 (2013), 동방한문학회[DOI]
  21. 차충환, "조선시대 중국소설의 수용과 비평에 관한 연구", 인문학연구, (38), pp.207~240 (2018), 인문학연구원[DOI]
  22. 韓梅, "論朝鮮后期實學派對金聖歎的接受", 韓中人文學研究, (10) (2003)
  23. 鄭善姬, "朝鮮文人金聖歎評批本에 대한 讀書談論研究", 東方學志 (2005)
  24. 鄭夏英, "≪廣寒楼記≫評批研究", 韓國古代研究, (1) (1995)
  25. "한국민족문화대백과", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)