朝鮮 中期 文人의 글에서 살펴본 中國古典小說에 대한 批評
The Ancient Chinese Novels Criticism in the Mid-Joseon Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
During Joseon Dynasty, discussion on ‘novel’ was very activated and there were literati in the center thereof. Amount and content of the preface of publication or miscellaneous records of literati during Joseon Dynasty are very diversified. Preface used to have been written upon somebody’s request or published along with one’s own compilation, while miscellaneous records had more various forms from a few short writing to book report, etc. Meanwhile as the researcher has conducted this research, discussion of the novel discussed in the annals has been mainly made of opposite opinion besides extreme dispute as like or not. Compared to that, the researcher could determine that the preface and miscellaneous more variously included literati’s honest opinion about novels of that period, as the researcher continued this research. Besides, some points were determined that the opinion about the novel discussed in the preface, the view of novel reported by their own miscellaneous records or others’ records appeared different. The basis is still subtle, however the researcher considers that there would be more historical material as this, if this research is continued to late Joseon. Particularly, this research determined that positive criticism of novel stood out more in the preface of published book during Joseon Dynasty or literati’s miscellaneous records than the criticism of the annals. Meanwhile lots of scholars have insisted that literati, scholars, or neo-Confucianists officially opposed novels, however there are opinions that they actually enjoyed reading novels. The basis of this seems to be the preface and miscellaneous records. Therefore, if this research strongly proceeded negative view on Joseon novel through annals criticism, this research also investigated mainly the discussion on positive opinion of the literati and scholars about novels of that period through the records of preface or miscellaneous records. Before any sharp discussion on fiction of novel had been proceeded during the 17th century, above all, there are sentences regarding novels as ‘interesting’, ‘instructive’, ‘good for time killing’, ‘enlarges experience and knowledge’, etc., this research intensively investigated this part. This research firstly investigated criticism of Chinese novels among the sentences of preface and miscellaneous records from early Joseon to mid Joseon, and investigated any difference from the content of the annals. Henceforth, the researcher considers that this research could be a basis to research the ancient chinese novels criticism discussion on late Joseon.
Abstract
During Joseon Dynasty, discussion on ‘novel’ was very activated and there were literati in the center thereof. Amount and content of the preface of publication or miscellaneous records of literati during Joseon Dynasty are very diversified. Preface used to have been written upon somebody’s request or published along with one’s own compilation, while miscellaneous records had more various forms from a few short writing to book report, etc. Meanwhile as the researcher has conducted this research, discussion of the novel discussed in the annals has been mainly made of opposite opinion besides extreme dispute as like or not. Compared to that, the researcher could determine that the preface and miscellaneous more variously included literati’s honest opinion about novels of that period, as the researcher continued this research. Besides, some points were determined that the opinion about the novel discussed in the preface, the view of novel reported by their own miscellaneous records or others’ records appeared different. The basis is still subtle, however the researcher considers that there would be more historical material as this, if this research is continued to late Joseon. Particularly, this research determined that positive criticism of novel stood out more in the preface of published book during Joseon Dynasty or literati’s miscellaneous records than the criticism of the annals. Meanwhile lots of scholars have insisted that literati, scholars, or neo-Confucianists officially opposed novels, however there are opinions that they actually enjoyed reading novels. The basis of this seems to be the preface and miscellaneous records. Therefore, if this research strongly proceeded negative view on Joseon novel through annals criticism, this research also investigated mainly the discussion on positive opinion of the literati and scholars about novels of that period through the records of preface or miscellaneous records. Before any sharp discussion on fiction of novel had been proceeded during the 17th century, above all, there are sentences regarding novels as ‘interesting’, ‘instructive’, ‘good for time killing’, ‘enlarges experience and knowledge’, etc., this research intensively investigated this part. This research firstly investigated criticism of Chinese novels among the sentences of preface and miscellaneous records from early Joseon to mid Joseon, and investigated any difference from the content of the annals. Henceforth, the researcher considers that this research could be a basis to research the ancient chinese novels criticism discussion on late Joseon.
참고문헌 (27)
- 金台俊, "(原本)朝鲜小说史" (1939), 学艺社
- 簡鎬允, "韓國古小說批評硏究" (2002), 景仁文化社
- 무악고소설자료연구회, "한국고소설관련자료집ⅠㆍⅡ" (2005), 태학사
- 민관동, "中國古典小說在韓國之傳播" (1998), 學林出版社
- 민관동, "中國古典小說史料叢考" (2001), 아세아문화사
- 민관동, "中國古典小說批評資料叢考" (2003), 학고방
- 朴晟义, "韩国古代小说史" (1958), 日新社
- 柳鐸一, "韓國古小說批評資料集成" (1994), 아세아문화사
- 李在秀, "韩国小说研究" (1973), 형설출판사
- 張孝鉉, "韓國古典小說史硏究" (2002), 고려대학교출판부
- 赵东一, "韩国小说之理论" (1982), 知识产业社
- 郑相珍, "韩国古典小说研究" (2000), 三知院
- 郑尧一, "古典批评用语研究" (1998), 태학사
- 丁奎福, "韩国文学과中国文学" (2001), 国学资料院
- 정현기, "韩国小说之理论" (1997), 솔
- 최운식, "韩国古小说研究" (1997), 보고사
- 韩国古小说研究会, "古小说의 著作과 传播" (1994), 亚细亚文化社
- 华镜古典文学研究会, "古典小说研究" (1993), 一志社
- 方正耀, "中国小说批评史略" (1994), 乙酉文化社
- Richards, I. A, "文艺批评的原理" (1977), 玄岩社
- Girard, Rene, "小说的理论" (1977), 三英社
- 大谷森繁, "朝鮮後期小說讀者硏究" (1985), 고대민족문화연구소
- 朴在淵, "朝鲜时代中国通俗小说翻译本研究―以乐善斋本为中心", 博士, pp.1993
- 吴春泽, "古小说批评史研究", 博士, pp.1990
- 王鸿军, "明代汉籍流入朝鲜李朝及其影响", 硕士, pp.2007
- "한국민족문화대백과"
