혁명시대 여성문학의 거처 — 딩링(丁玲)과 장아이링(張愛玲) 대조기
The Residence of Women’s Literature in the Era of Revolution: The Contrast of Ding Ling and Zhang Ailing
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to comprehensively contrast the growth environment and literature view of Dingling and Zhang Ailing, and to view the relationship between the Chinese Revolution and modern women’s literature. If Dingling was a revolutionary and literature was the weapon of revolution, Zhang Ailing was a natural storyteller and literature itself was a goal. If Dingling was filled with the passion of revolution more than anyone else and immersed in the practice, Zhang Ailing, on the contrary, deliberately distanced himself from the revolutionary enthusiasm. Dingling, who lived in the Soviet Union in the 1940s, paid attention to the new subjects and phenomena that emerged during the Communist anti-Japanese war and revolution, while Zhang Ailing lived in Shanghai occupied by the Japanese military and paid attention to the old and solid daily lives of urban minorities. If Dingling, who wanted to represent a revolutionary, political, organized, and new era, was a “revolutionary angel” Nora who supported the history of Chinese socialism until the end, Zhang Ailing was a writer who continued the genealogy of urban traditional literature while representing the old era. It is no exaggeration to say that the two represent the two most extreme trends in Chinese modern literature. Dingling and Zhang Ailing made extreme political choices, but as brave Nora, their self-consciousness as women is hard to determine. The literary achievements they left are all valuable records in that they show the different experiences and areas that Nora chose higher than anyone else.
Abstract
This paper aims to comprehensively contrast the growth environment and literature view of Dingling and Zhang Ailing, and to view the relationship between the Chinese Revolution and modern women’s literature. If Dingling was a revolutionary and literature was the weapon of revolution, Zhang Ailing was a natural storyteller and literature itself was a goal. If Dingling was filled with the passion of revolution more than anyone else and immersed in the practice, Zhang Ailing, on the contrary, deliberately distanced himself from the revolutionary enthusiasm. Dingling, who lived in the Soviet Union in the 1940s, paid attention to the new subjects and phenomena that emerged during the Communist anti-Japanese war and revolution, while Zhang Ailing lived in Shanghai occupied by the Japanese military and paid attention to the old and solid daily lives of urban minorities. If Dingling, who wanted to represent a revolutionary, political, organized, and new era, was a “revolutionary angel” Nora who supported the history of Chinese socialism until the end, Zhang Ailing was a writer who continued the genealogy of urban traditional literature while representing the old era. It is no exaggeration to say that the two represent the two most extreme trends in Chinese modern literature. Dingling and Zhang Ailing made extreme political choices, but as brave Nora, their self-consciousness as women is hard to determine. The literary achievements they left are all valuable records in that they show the different experiences and areas that Nora chose higher than anyone else.
참고문헌 (21)
- 丁玲, "丁玲全集 1-12" (2001), 河北人民出版社
- 丁玲, "丁玲散文 上⋅下" (1997), 中國廣播電視出版社
- 張愛玲, "張愛玲文集" (1992), 安徽文藝出版社
- 쭝청, "딩링" (1998), 다섯수레
- 김미란, "현대 중국여성의 삶을 찾아서 : 국가⋅젠더⋅문화" (2009), 소명
- 이선이, "딩링 : 중국 여성주의의 여정" (2015), 한울아카데미
- 임우경, "중국의 반전통주의 민족서사와 젠더" (2013), 창비
- 丁守和, "中國近代啓蒙思潮" (1999), 中國社會科學文獻出版社
- 郜元寶, "三八節有感 : 關于丁玲" (2000), 北京廣播學院出版社
- 李向東, "丁玲傳" (2015), 中國大百科全書出版社
- 劉思謙, ""娜拉"言說" (1993), 河南人民出版社
- 孟悅, "浮出歷史地表" (1989), 河南人民出版社
- 夏志淸, "中國現代小說史" (1979), 友聯出版社
- 子通, "張愛玲評說六十年" (2001), 中國華僑出版社
- 박자영, "소문과 서사: 장아이링 『전기』 다시 읽기", 여성문학연구, 20(20), pp.73~103 (2008), 한국여성문학학회
- 임우경, "여성의 시간, 서사 그리고 민족 ― 張愛玲 『傳奇』의 징후 읽기", 중국현대문학, (55), pp.1~34 (2010), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 임우경, "노라의 자살: 현대 민족서사와 장애령의 ≪霸王別姬≫", 중국현대문학, (38) (2006)
- 임우경, "경성지련의 쓸쓸한 계시", 중국문화연구, 1 (2002)
- 裴顯生, "談論淪陷區文學硏究中的認識誤區", 文藝報, ~ (2000)
- 錢蔭愉, "丁玲與張愛玲: 一個時代的昇騰飛揚與蒼凉墮落", 貴州民族學院學報(社會科學版), (2) (1987)
- "常德婦女反對封建禮敎的鬪爭, 常德史志"[URL]
