본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Theory and Practice of Universal History in Polybian Historiography

김경현
한국서양고전학회 (The Korean Society of Greco-Roman Studies)|2010.06|서양고전학연구 (The Journal of Greco-Roman Studies)|제40호|pp. 83-111

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

역사historiographypragmaticuniversal폴리비오스Polybios사학사Histories국사적세계사적
주제분류서양고전어와문학

초록

“His view of history is pragmatic and it is universal.” So was Polybian historiography characterized in brevity by Bury in the beginning of the last century. Yet, a century’s historiography shows that the second feature has been, by and large, neglected in comparison with the first. It has never been discussed as an independent subject, and as far as I know, only Pédech and Sacks dealt it respectively in a chapter of their books. This paper wishes to fill in this relative vacuum in two ways. First, it tries to provide a synthetical understanding of the subject by dealing with its cardinal aspects: namely the place of Polybius’ Histories in the context of ancient universal history (chapter 4) as well as the theory and practice of Polybian universal history (chapters 1-2). Secondly, it proposes a new idea of how the concept of universal history creeps into Histories as a second thought. This attempt signifies an invocation of the ill-fated critical spirit of Laqueur, who had entertained the same suspicion that I happened to have while reading the text,though I end up with manifestly different results. The chapter 3 is devoted to the matter, and wishes to draw attention at least to the fact that Laqueur’s suspicion is still worth attention.

Abstract

“His view of history is pragmatic and it is universal.” So was Polybian historiography characterized in brevity by Bury in the beginning of the last century. Yet, a century’s historiography shows that the second feature has been, by and large, neglected in comparison with the first. It has never been discussed as an independent subject, and as far as I know, only Pédech and Sacks dealt it respectively in a chapter of their books. This paper wishes to fill in this relative vacuum in two ways. First, it tries to provide a synthetical understanding of the subject by dealing with its cardinal aspects: namely the place of Polybius’ Histories in the context of ancient universal history (chapter 4) as well as the theory and practice of Polybian universal history (chapters 1-2). Secondly, it proposes a new idea of how the concept of universal history creeps into Histories as a second thought. This attempt signifies an invocation of the ill-fated critical spirit of Laqueur, who had entertained the same suspicion that I happened to have while reading the text,though I end up with manifestly different results. The chapter 3 is devoted to the matter, and wishes to draw attention at least to the fact that Laqueur’s suspicion is still worth attention.

참고문헌 (82)

  1. Alonso-Núñez, J.M, "Die Abfolge der Weltreiche bei Polybios und Dionysios von Halikarnassos", Historia, 33, pp.411~426 (1983)
  2. Alonso-Núñez, J.M, "An Augustan World History:the Historiae Philippicae of Pompeius Trogus", Greece and Rome, 34, pp.56~72 (1987)
  3. Alonso-Núñez, J.M, "Emergence of Universal Historiography, Purpose of Histotry: Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd centuries B.C", pp.173~192 (1990), Lovanii
  4. Badian,E, "Rome and Antiochus the Great:A Study in Cold War, in Studies in Greek and Roman History", pp.112~139 (1964)
  5. Breebaart,A.B., "Weltgeschichte als Thema der antiken Geschichtsschreibung", Acta Historiae Neerlandica, 1, pp.1~21 (1966)
  6. Brink,C.O., "The Construction of the Sixth Book of Polybius", Classical Quarterly, 4, pp.97~122 (1954)
  7. Briscoe,J, "Eastern Policy and Senatorial Politics 168-146 B.C", Historia, 18, pp.49~70 (1969)
  8. Brown,T.S, "The Greek Historians" (1973)
  9. Bury,J.B, "The Ancient Greek Historians" (1908)
  10. Clarke,K, "Universal Perspectives in Historiography, in The Limits of Historiography", pp.249~279 (1999)
  11. Cuntz,O, "Polybius und sein Werk" (1902), Leipzig
  12. Derow,P.S., "Polybius,Rome,and the East", Journal of Roman Studies, 69, pp.1~15 (1979)
  13. Dewald,C, "The Construction of meaning in the First Three Historians, A Companian to Greek and Roman Historiography", pp.89~101 (2007)
  14. Drews,R., "Ephorus and History Written κκκά γέννς", American Journal of Philology, 84, pp.244~255 (1963)
  15. Drews,R., "Assyria in Classical Universal Histories", Historia, 14, pp.129~142 (1965)
  16. Drews,R., "The Greek Accounts of Eastern History" (1973)
  17. Drews,R., "Ephorus’ κατά γένος History Revisited", Hermes, 104, pp.497~498 (1976)
  18. Dorey,T.A., "Latin Historians" (1966)
  19. Errington,R.M, "The Chronology of Polybius' Histories,Books I and II", Journal of Roman Studies, 57, pp.96~108 (1967)
  20. Ferrary,J.-L, "Philhellénisme et Impérialisme" (1988)
  21. Flower,M, "Theopompus of Chios: History an Rhetoric in the 4th Century BC" (1994)
  22. Flower,M., "Herodotus and Persia,The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus", pp.274~289 (2006)
  23. Fornara, C. W, "Herodotus: an Interpretative Essay" (1971)
  24. Fornara, C. W, "The Nature of History in Ancient Greece and Rome" (1983)
  25. Gelzer, M, "Der Anfang römischer Geschichtsschreibung", Kleine Schriften, 3, pp.93~103 (1964)
  26. Gelzer, M, "Die Hellenische ΠΡΟΚΑΤΑΣΚΕΥΗ im zweiten Buche des Polybios", Kleine Schriften, 3, pp.111~122 (1964)
  27. Gelzer, M, "Die Achaica im Geschichtswerk des Polybios", Kleine Schriften, 3, pp.123~154 (1940)
  28. Gelzer, M, "Über die Arbeitsweise des Polybios", Kleine Schriften, 3, pp.161~190 (1956)
  29. Gelzer, M, "Die pragmatische Geschichtsschreibung des Polybios", Kleine Schriften, 3, pp.155~160 (1964)
  30. Gigante,M, "Herodot, der Erste Historiker des Abendlandes, in Herodot", pp.259~281 (1965)
  31. Gruen,E.S, "The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome" (1984)
  32. Harris,W.V, "War and Imperialism in Republican Rome 327-70 B.C" (1979)
  33. Heuss,A., "Über die Schwierigkeit,Weltgeschichte zu schreiben", Saeculum, 27, pp.1~35 (1950)
  34. Laqueur, R, "Ephoros", Hermes, 46, pp.161~354 (1911)
  35. Laqueur,R., "Polybius" (1913)
  36. Laqueur,R., "Diodorea", Hermes, 86, pp.257~290 (1958)
  37. Lehmann, G. A., "Polybios und die ältere und zeitgenössische griechische Geschichtsschreibung: einige Bemerkungen in Entrentiens sur l'antiquité Classique 20", pp.145~200 (1974)
  38. Leo,F, "Geschichte der Römischen Literatur" (1967)
  39. Lorenz,K, "Untersuchungen zum Geschichtswerk des Polybios" (1931)
  40. Marincola,J., "Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography" (1997)
  41. Marincola,J., "Universal History from Ephorus to Diodorus, A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography", pp.171~179 (2007)
  42. McDonald,A.H, "Review of F.W.Walbank,A Historical Commentary on Polybius Vol I", Journal of Roman Studies, 48, pp.179~183 (1958)
  43. Meister,K, "Die Synchronistische Darstellung des Polybios im Gegensatz zur Disposition des Ephoros und Theopomp", Hermes, 99, pp.506~508 (1971)
  44. Mendels,D, "The Five Empires:A Note on a Propagandistic Topos", American Journal of Philology, 102, pp.330~337 (1981)
  45. Momigliano,A., "The Origins of Universal History, in Secondo Contributo alla Storia degli Studi Classici", pp.77~103 (1960)
  46. Momigliano, A, "Atene nel iii secolo A.C. e la scoperta di Roma nelle storie di Timeo di Tauromenio, in Terzo Contributo alla Storia degli Studi Classici", pp.23~53 (1966)
  47. Momigliano, A, "Daniele e la Teoria Greca della Successione degli Imperi, in Settimo Contribuito", pp.297~304 (1984)
  48. Musti,D., "Polibio negli studi dell'ultimo ventennio, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt II, ii", pp.1114~1181 (1972)
  49. Musti,D., "Polibio e l'imperialismo romano" (1978)
  50. Myres,J, "Herodotus: Father of History" (1953)
  51. Pearson,L., "Ephorus and Timaeus in Diodorus:Laqueur’s Thesis Rejected", Historia, 33, pp.1~20 (1984)
  52. Pédech,P., "La Méthode Historique de Polybe" (1964)
  53. Pédech, P, "La culture de Polybe et la science de son temps", Polybe, Entrentiens sur l'antiquité Classique, 20, pp.39~60 (1974)
  54. Petzold,K-E, "Studien zur Methode des Polybios und zu ihrer historischen Auswertung" (1969)
  55. Petzold,K-E, "Kyklos und Telos im Geschichtsdenken des Polybios", Saeculum, 28, pp.253~290 (1977)
  56. Petzold,K-E, "Griechischer Einfluss auf die Anfänge Römischer Ostpolitik", Historia, 41, pp.205~245 (1992)
  57. Richardson,J.S., "Polybius’ View of the Roman Empire", Papers of the British School at Rome, 47, pp.1~11 (1979)
  58. de Romilly, J., "L'Utilité de L'Histoire selon Thucydide", Histoire et Historiens dans l'Antiquité, Entrentiens sur l'antiquité Classique, 4, pp.39~66 (1956)
  59. Rood,T., "Thucydides.Narrative and Explanation" (1998)
  60. Rood,T., "Herodotus and foreign lands, The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus", pp.290~305 (2006)
  61. Sacks,K, "Polybius on the Writing of History" (1981)
  62. de Sanctis, G., "Storia dei Romani, III, i" (1967)
  63. von Scala,R, "Die Studien des Polybios" (1890)
  64. Schepens G, "The Shadow of Polybius: intertextuality as a Research Tool in Greek Historiograph" (2005), Peeters
  65. Schmitthenner,W., "Rome and India:Aspects of Universal History during the Principate", Journal of Roman Studies, 69, pp.90~106 (1979)
  66. Stier,H.E, "Roms Aufstieg zur Weltmacht und die griechische Welt" (1957)
  67. Strasburger, H, "Thukydides, hersg", pp.412~ (1968)
  68. Strasburger,H., "Die Wesensbestimmung der Geschichte durch die antike Geschichtsschreibung" (1966)
  69. Svoboda, "Die Abfassungszeit des Geschichtswerkes des Polybios", Philologus, 72, pp.465~483 (1913)
  70. Swain,J.W, "The Theory of the Four Monarchies Opposition History under the Roman Empire", Classical Philology, 35, pp.1~21 (1940)
  71. Vannicelli,P, "Herotus' Egypt and the Foundations of Universal History, in The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotu", pp.211~240 (2001)
  72. Walbank, F. W, "Polybius on the Roman Constitutions", pp.73~89 (1943), Classical Quarterly
  73. Walbank, F. W, "A Historical Commentary on Polybius, 3 vols" (1979)
  74. Walbank, F. W, "Polemic in Polybius", pp.262~279 (1985)
  75. Walbank, F. W, "Polybius and Rome’s Eastern Policy", pp.138~156 (1985)
  76. Walbank,F.W., "Polybius" (1972)
  77. Walbank, F. W, "Polybius between Greece and Rome, Polybe, Entrentiens sur l'antiquité Classique 20", pp.280~297 (1985)
  78. Walbank, F. W, "Synchronisms in Polybius, Boos IV and V, Polis and Impeium: Studies in honour of E. T. Salmon", pp.298~312 (1985), Selected Papers
  79. Walbank, F. W, "Symploke: Its Role in Polybius’ Histories", pp.313~324 (1985)
  80. Walbank, F. W, "Polybius’ Last Ten Books, Historiogrphia antiqua: commentationes Lovanienses in honorem W. Peremans", pp.325~343 (1985)
  81. Walbank, F. W, "Polybius, Rome and the Hellenistic World" (2002)
  82. Will,E, "Histoire Politique du Monde Hellénistique (323-30 av. J.C.)" (1979), Nancy

관련 논문AI추천

pragmatike historia와 tyche －폴리비오스의 역사이론과 서술의 실제－김경현한국사학사학회 · 韓國史學史學報2009 · 제20호The Idea of politeia: its Role and DestinySumio Takabatake한국서양고대역사문화학회 · 서양고대사연구2020 · 제59호폴리비오스의 발전관과 혼합정체 국가들 -이탈리아 동맹의 관점에서 다시 읽기-김창성한국서양고대역사문화학회 · 서양고대사연구2010 · 제26호Thucydides on the Fate of the Democratic Empire박성우국제학연구소 · Journal of International and Area Studies2008 · 제15권 제1호The Mixed Constitution between Polybius and Cicero김창성한국서양고전학회 · 서양고전학연구2010 · 제42호Historiography and Inscription in Ancient Greece - How were Inscriptions Narrated? -히로시 마에노한국서양고전학회 · 서양고전학연구2011 · 제44호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

THE QUEST FOR PEACE IN THE ANCIENT WORLD: WHY GREECE?Kurt A. Raaflaubpp. 5-36WHY DID GREEKS AND ROMANS FIGHT WARS?Matthew Trundlepp. 37-56Pirates, Warfare and Failing States in Ancient GreeceBurkhard Meissnerpp. 57-82Retrospect and Prospect of the Western Ancient History Studies in Korea: On the Occasion of the “50th Anniversary of The Korean Society of Western History”김덕수pp. 113-133What do you know when you know yourself? – Knowing oneself in Plato’s Charmides 165a7 ff.유혁pp. 135-161
원문 보기