본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Spelling and Pronunciation: The Phonemic Principle in the Latin Orthographic Debate

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The paper presents an analysis of ancient Roman theories on the problem of orthographic standardization and its criteria, focusing on the relationship between spelling and pronunciation. In particular, I will discuss the ‘orthographic ideology’ found in the Ars of the grammarian, rhetorician and Neoplatonic philosopher Marius Victorinus (4th c. AD). Marius Victorinus’ position is apparently that of a radical theorist who advocates phonetic spelling in every context, even when it would produce unfamiliar forms. His theory follows a radical application of the ‘phonemic principle’, according to which each grapheme should correspond to a single phoneme in a strict one to-one relationship. The paper aims to trace the background of Marius Victorinus’ views, in order to present an account of the influence of the ‘phonemic principle’ in the evolution of Latin orthography and in the works of Latin scholars and grammarians, also including prominent intellectuals and leaders such as Accius, Lucilius and Varro, as well as Caesar, Augustus and Claudius. The paper also discusses key concepts of ancient grammatical debate such as that of ratio, consuetudo and auctoritas. Finally in the paper I will also consider the relationship of this orthographic debate with broader cultural discourses, such as the opposition between analogists and anomalists in late Republic, the archaizing movement of the second century, and the effort of (imperial) power to ‘control and organize’ Latin knowledge.

Abstract

The paper presents an analysis of ancient Roman theories on the problem of orthographic standardization and its criteria, focusing on the relationship between spelling and pronunciation. In particular, I will discuss the ‘orthographic ideology’ found in the Ars of the grammarian, rhetorician and Neoplatonic philosopher Marius Victorinus (4th c. AD). Marius Victorinus’ position is apparently that of a radical theorist who advocates phonetic spelling in every context, even when it would produce unfamiliar forms. His theory follows a radical application of the ‘phonemic principle’, according to which each grapheme should correspond to a single phoneme in a strict one to-one relationship. The paper aims to trace the background of Marius Victorinus’ views, in order to present an account of the influence of the ‘phonemic principle’ in the evolution of Latin orthography and in the works of Latin scholars and grammarians, also including prominent intellectuals and leaders such as Accius, Lucilius and Varro, as well as Caesar, Augustus and Claudius. The paper also discusses key concepts of ancient grammatical debate such as that of ratio, consuetudo and auctoritas. Finally in the paper I will also consider the relationship of this orthographic debate with broader cultural discourses, such as the opposition between analogists and anomalists in late Republic, the archaizing movement of the second century, and the effort of (imperial) power to ‘control and organize’ Latin knowledge.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. Adams, J. N., "The Regional Diversification of Latin : 200 BC-AD 600" (2007), Cambridge University Press
  2. Adams, J. N., "Social Variation and the Latin Language" (2013), Cambridge University Press
  3. Biddau, F., "The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Latin Textual Criticism", Oxford University Press
  4. Allen, W. S., "Vox Latina : A Guide to the Pronunciation of Classical Latin" (1978), Cambridge University Press
  5. Bernardi Perini, G., "Le"riforme"ortografiche latine di etàrepubblicana", AIΩN, 5, pp.141~169 (1983)
  6. Biddau, F., "Q Terenti Scauri de Orthographia" (2008), Weidmann
  7. Biddau, F., "The Latin of the Grammarians: Reflections about Language in the Roman World", pp.49~68 (2016), Brepols
  8. Brearley, D., "Texts and Studies in Latin Orthography to 1977", Classical world, 72, pp.385~392 (1978)
  9. Buck, C., "Notes on Latin Orthography", The Classical Review, 13, pp.156~167 (1899)
  10. Chahoud, A., "Language and Nature in the Classical Roman World", pp.46~78 (2019), Cambridge University Press
  11. Chesterton, G., "All Things Considered" (1915), Methuen
  12. Clackson, J., "The Blackwell History of the Latin Language" (2007), Blackwell
  13. De Paolis, P., "Libri di scuola e pratiche didattiche: Dall'antichità al rinascimento", pp.229~291 (2010), Università di Cassino
  14. Di Napoli, M., "Velius Longus : De Orthographia" (2011), Weidmann
  15. Fehling, D., "Varro und die grammatische Lehre von der Analogie und der Flexion: Teile I- II", Glotta, 36, pp.48~100 (1957)
  16. Fontaine, M., "Sicilicissitat (Plautus, Menaechmi 12) and Early Geminate Writing in Latin (with an Appendix on Men. 13)", Mnemosyne, 59, pp.95~110 (2006)
  17. Garcea, A., "Caesar’s De Analogia : Edition, Translation, and Commentary" (2012), Oxford University Press
  18. Garcea, A., "Nigidius Figulus’ Naturalism: Between Grammar and Philosophy", pp.79~102 (2019)
  19. Holford-Strevens, L., "Aulus Gellius : An Antonine Scholar and His Achievement" (2003), Oxford University Press
  20. Leumann, M., "Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre" (1977), C. H. Beck
  21. Mariotti, I., "Marii Victorini Ars Grammatica: Introduzione, testo critico e commento a cura di Italo Mariotti" (1967), F. Le Monnier
  22. Pagani, L., "Brill’s Companion to Ancient Scholarship", pp.798~849 (2014), Brill
  23. Pezzini, G., "Terence and the Verb ‘to be’ in Latin" (2015), Oxford University Press
  24. Pezzini, G., "Nature and Language in the Classical Roman World" (2019), Cambridge University Press
  25. Sabbadini, R., "Anomalia e analogia nell’ortografia Latina", Rivista di Filologia e Istruzione Classica, 31, pp.19~45 (1903)
  26. Siebenborn, E., "Die Lehre von der Sprachrichtigkeit und ihren Kriterien : Studien zur antiken normativen Grammatik" (1976), Grüner
  27. Somerville, T., "The Orthography of the New Gallus and the Spelling Rules of Lucilius", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 160, pp.59~64 (2007)
  28. Springer, L., "Aulus Gellius : On Historical and Descriptive Linguistics", The Classical Journal, 54, pp.121~128 (1958)
  29. Stoppacci, P., "Cassiodoro, De orthographia : Tradizione manoscritta, fortuna, edizione critica" (2010), SISMEL Edizioni del Galluzzo
  30. Strzelecki, W., "the entry of the Paulys Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft" (1942), J. B. Metzler
  31. Tauber, A., "George Bernard Shaw on Language" (1965), Peter Owen
  32. Traina, A., "L’alfabeto e la pronunzia del latino" (1973), Pàtron
  33. Uría, J., "Cornutus on Varro on the Aspirate H: Making Full Sense of Cassiod. Orth. 1.79-87 Stoppacci (Cornut. Fr. 16 Mazzarino)", Phoenix, 74, pp.79~90 (2020)
  34. Vine, B., "Studies in Archaic Latin Inscriptions" (1993), Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck
  35. Wallace, R. E., "A Companion to the Latin Language", pp.9~28 (2011), Wiley-Blackwell
  36. Wallace, R. E., "Early Latin: Constructs, Diversity, Reception", pp.15~40 (2023), Cambridge University Press
  37. Weiss, M. L., "Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin" (2009), Beech Stave Press
  38. Wilmanns, A., "De M. Terenti Varronis Libris Grammatics" (1864), Apud Weidmannos
  39. Zetzel, J. E. G., "Latin Textual Criticism in Antiquity" (1981), Arno Press
  40. Zetzel, J. E. G., "Critics, Compilers, and Commentators : An Introduction to Roman Philology : 200 BCE-800 CE" (2018), Oxford University Press
  41. Zetzel, J. E. G., "Natural Law and Natural Language in the First Century BCE", pp.191~211 (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)