Protreptic and Textuality in Horace’s Epistles
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article aims to provide an analysis of the first book of Horace’s Epistles from the perspective of philosophical protreptic. Although the relationship between Horace and philosophy has been widely explored, less attention has been given to Horace’s approach to specific genres and texts of ancient philosophical literature. This article sets out to explore this aspect by analysing the protreptic characteristics of Horace’s first book of Epistles, the general conception of philosophy that emerges from it, and how this relates to the specific textual form chosen for this collection: the poetic epistle. This analysis allows us to see how the philosophical content is not limited, but rather reinforced by the textual form assumed by it; in fact, the protreptic position assumed by Horace is made possible by the communicative and didactic potential of the poetic and epistolary form. Furthermore, this article may provide some useful insights into the genre of protreptic in ancient philosophical literature and its definition.
Abstract
This article aims to provide an analysis of the first book of Horace’s Epistles from the perspective of philosophical protreptic. Although the relationship between Horace and philosophy has been widely explored, less attention has been given to Horace’s approach to specific genres and texts of ancient philosophical literature. This article sets out to explore this aspect by analysing the protreptic characteristics of Horace’s first book of Epistles, the general conception of philosophy that emerges from it, and how this relates to the specific textual form chosen for this collection: the poetic epistle. This analysis allows us to see how the philosophical content is not limited, but rather reinforced by the textual form assumed by it; in fact, the protreptic position assumed by Horace is made possible by the communicative and didactic potential of the poetic and epistolary form. Furthermore, this article may provide some useful insights into the genre of protreptic in ancient philosophical literature and its definition.
참고문헌 (40)
- Alieva, O., "When Wisdom Calls: Philosophical Protreptic in Antiquity", pp.29~45 (2018), Brepols
- Borzsák, S., "Q. Horati Flacci opera" (1984), B. G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft
- Chroust, A. H., "What prompted Aristotle to address the Protrepticus to Themison", Hermes, 94, pp.202~207 (1966)
- Collins, J. H., "Exhortations to Philosophy. The Protreptics of Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle" (2015), Oxford University Press
- Cucchiarelli, A., "Orazio: Epistole I. Introduzione, traduzione e commento" (2019), Edizioni della Normale
- Damiani, V., "La Kompendienliteratur nella scuola di Epicuro : forme, funzioni, contesto" (2021), de Gruyter
- de G, A., "the First Book of Horace’s Epistles" (2014), Gorgias Press
- Düring, I., "Der Protreptikos des Aristoteles : Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar" (2014), Klostermann
- Eucken, C., "Isokrates. Seine Positionen in der Auseinandersetzung mit den zeitgenössischen Philosophen" (1983), de Gruyter
- Fedeli, P., "Q. Orazio Flacco: Le opere. II: Le epistole, l’arte poetica. Testo critico di P. F., traduzione di C. C., Roma: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato", Libreria dello Stato, ~ (1997)
- Festugière, A. -J., "Les trois «protreptiques» de Platon : Euthydème, Phédon, Epinomis" (1973), Vrin
- Gastaldi, S., "Bios hairetotatos : generi di vita e felicità in Aristotele" (2003), Bibliopolis
- Gibson, R. K., "Form and Content in Didactic Poetry", pp.67~98 (1997), Levante
- Grilli, A., "Marco Tullio Cicerone: Ortensio. Testo critico, introduzione, versione e commento" (2010), Pàtron editore
- Hadot, P., "Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique(Deuxième édition revue et augmentée)" (1987), Études augustiniennes
- Hadot, P., "La philosophie comme manière de vivre : entretiens avec Jeannie Carlier et Arnold I" (2001), Albin Michel
- Hartlich, P., "De exhortationum a Graecis Romanisque scriptarum historia et indole", Leipziger Studien zur classischen Philologie, 11, pp.207~336 (1889)
- Hessler, J. E., "Epikur: Brief an Menoikeus. Edition, Übersetzung, Einleitung und Kommentar" (2014), Schwabe Verlag
- Hutchinson, D. S., "Authenticating Aristotle's Protrepticus", Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 29, pp.193~294 (2005)
- "Aristotle: Protrepticus or Exhortation to Philosophy (citations, fragments, paraphrases, and other evidence)" (2017)[URL]
- Jordan, M. D., "Ancient Philosophic Protreptic and the Problem of Persuasive Genres", Rhetorica, 4, pp.309~333 (1986)
- Keller, O., "Pseudacronis scholia in Horatium vetustiora, vol. 2" (1904), aedibus B. G. Teubneri
- Kirchner, R., "Protreptik und Rhetorik : Werbung für die Beredsamkeit in der römischen Literatur" (2022), Franz Steiner
- Kotzé, A., "‘In Search of Truth’: Augustine, Manichaeism and other Gnosticism. Studies for Johannes van Oort at Sixty", pp.3~23 (2011), Brill
- La Penna, A., "Τίς ἄριστος βίος; Interpretazione della prima Ode di Orazio", Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Lettere e Filosofia, 24, pp.161~181 (1955)
- Markovich, D., "Promoting a New Kind of Education : Greek and Roman Philosophical Protreptic" (2022), Brill
- Michel, A., "Enciclopedia oraziana, vol. 2", pp.78~81 (1997), Istituto della Enciclopedia italiana
- Moles, J., "The Cambridge Companion to Horace", pp.165~180 (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Morrison, A. D., "Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography", pp.107~131 (2007), Oxford University Press
- Most, G. W., "Plato and the Poets", pp.1~20 (2011), Brill
- Pistelli, H., "Iamblichi Protrepticus" (1888), aedibus B. G. Teubneri
- Smith, T. W., "The Protreptic Character of the Nicomachean Ethics", Polity, 27, pp.307~330 (1994)
- Stowers, S. K., "Letter Writing in Greco-Roman Antiquity" (1986), The Westminster Press
- Usher, S., "Isocrates : Panegyricus and To Nicocles" (1990), Aris & Phillips
- Vahlen, I., "Ennianae poesis reliquiae" (1903), B. G. Teubneri
- Van der Meeren, S., "Exhortation à la Philosophie. Le dossier grec:Aristote" (2011), Les Belles Lettres
- von Arnim, H., "Stoicorum veterum fragmenta. Volumen III: Chrysippi fragmenta moralia, fragmenta successorum Chrysippi" (1903), B. G. Teubneri
- Wachsmuth, C., "Ioannis Stobaei Anthologii libri duo priores qui inscribi solent Eclogae physicae et ethicae, 2 vols" (1884), apud Weidmannos
- Wefelmeier, C., "Die Sentenzensammlung der Demonicea", PhD, pp.1962
- Yona, S., "Epicurean Ethics in Horace : The Psychology of Satire" (2018), Oxford University Press