A Systematic Review of Benefit of Silicone Intubation in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives. Insertion of a silicone stent during endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is the most common procedure to prevent rhinostomy closure. It has been claimed that silicone intubation improves the surgical outcomes of endoscopic DCR. However, many reports have documented an equally high success rate for surgery without silicone intubation. Accordingly, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the outcomes of endoscopic DCR with and without silicone intubation and determine whether silicone intubation is actually beneficial for patients. Methods. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify relevant controlled trials evaluating endoscopic DCR with and without silicone intubation. The search was restricted to English articles published between January 2007 and December 2016. Relevant articles were reviewed to obtain information pertaining to interventions and outcomes. We also performed a meta-analysis of the relevant literature. Results. In total, 1,216 patients included in 12 randomized controlled trials were pooled. A total of 1,239 endoscopic DCR procedures were performed, and silicone stents were used in 533 procedures. The overall success rate for endoscopic DCR was 91.9% (1,139/1,239), while the success rates with and without silicone intubation were 92.9% (495/533) and 91.2% (644/706), respectively. There was no statistically significant heterogeneity among the included studies. A meta-analysis using a fixed-effects models showed no significant difference in the success rate between endoscopic DCR with silicone intubation and that without silicone intubation (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.89 to 2.12; P=0.148; z= 1.45). Furthermore, there were no significant differences with regard to surgical complications such as synechia, granulation, and postoperative bleeding. Conclusion. The findings of our meta-analysis suggest that the success rate and postoperative complication rate for endoscopic DCR is not influenced by the use of silicone intubation during the procedure.
Abstract
Objectives. Insertion of a silicone stent during endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is the most common procedure to prevent rhinostomy closure. It has been claimed that silicone intubation improves the surgical outcomes of endoscopic DCR. However, many reports have documented an equally high success rate for surgery without silicone intubation. Accordingly, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the outcomes of endoscopic DCR with and without silicone intubation and determine whether silicone intubation is actually beneficial for patients. Methods. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify relevant controlled trials evaluating endoscopic DCR with and without silicone intubation. The search was restricted to English articles published between January 2007 and December 2016. Relevant articles were reviewed to obtain information pertaining to interventions and outcomes. We also performed a meta-analysis of the relevant literature. Results. In total, 1,216 patients included in 12 randomized controlled trials were pooled. A total of 1,239 endoscopic DCR procedures were performed, and silicone stents were used in 533 procedures. The overall success rate for endoscopic DCR was 91.9% (1,139/1,239), while the success rates with and without silicone intubation were 92.9% (495/533) and 91.2% (644/706), respectively. There was no statistically significant heterogeneity among the included studies. A meta-analysis using a fixed-effects models showed no significant difference in the success rate between endoscopic DCR with silicone intubation and that without silicone intubation (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.89 to 2.12; P=0.148; z= 1.45). Furthermore, there were no significant differences with regard to surgical complications such as synechia, granulation, and postoperative bleeding. Conclusion. The findings of our meta-analysis suggest that the success rate and postoperative complication rate for endoscopic DCR is not influenced by the use of silicone intubation during the procedure.
참고문헌 (47)
- Unlu HH, "Comparison of surgical outcomes in primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation", Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 111(8), pp.704~709 (2002)[DOI]
- Leong SC, "A systematic review of outcomes after dacryocystorhinostomy in adults", Am J Rhinol Allergy, 24(1), pp.81~90 (2010)[DOI]
- Feng YF, "A meta-analysis of primary dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation", Can J Ophthalmol, 46(6), pp.521~527 (2011)[DOI]
- Callejas CA, "Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with selective stenting", Laryngoscope, 120(7), pp.1449~1452 (2010)[DOI]
- Syed MI, "Endoscopic primary dacryocystorhinostomy: are silicone tubes needed? Our experience in sixty three patients", Clin Otolaryngol, 38(5), pp.406~410 (2013)[DOI]
- McLachlan DL, "Results of dacryocystorhinostomy: analysis of the reoperations", Ophthalmic Surg, 11(7), pp.427~430 (1980)
- Sprekelsen MB, "Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical technique and results", Laryngoscope, 106(2), pp.187~189 (1996)[DOI]
- Boush GA, "Results of endonasal laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy", Ophthalmology, 101(5), pp.955~959 (1994)[DOI]
- Watkins LM, "The evolution of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy", Surv Ophthalmol, 48(1), pp.73~84 (2003)[DOI]
- Gu Z, "Silicone intubation and endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a meta-analysis", J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 39(6), pp.710~713 (2010)
- Sarode D, "The benefit of silicone stents in primary endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis", Clin Otolaryngol, 42(2), pp.307~314 (2017)[DOI]
- Okuyucu S, "Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone, polypropylene, and T-tube stents; randomized controlled trial of efficacy and safety", Am J Rhinol Allergy, 29(1), pp.63~68 (2015)[DOI]
- Tsirbas A, "Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps", Am J Ophthalmol, 135(1), pp.76~83 (2003)[DOI]
- Onerci M, "Long-term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy", Acta Otolaryngol, 120(2), pp.319~322 (2000)[DOI]
- Metson R, "Endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy", Laryngoscope, 104(3), pp.269~274 (1994)
- Griffiths JD, "Nasal catheter use in dacryocystorhinostomy", Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 7(3), pp.177~186 (1991)[DOI]
- Caversaccio M, "Insertion of double bicanalicular silicone tubes after endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in lacrimal canalicular stenosis: a 10-year experience", ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 68(5), pp.266~269 (2006)[DOI]
- Saeed BM, "Endoscopic DCR without stents: clinical guidelines and procedure", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 269(2), pp.545~549 (2012)[DOI]
- Unlu HH, "Long-term results in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: is intubation really required", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 140(4), pp.589~595 (2009)[DOI]
- Allen K, "Dacryocystorhinostomy failure: association with nasolacrimal silicone intubation", Ophthalmic Surg, 20(7), pp.486~489 (1989)
- Al-Qahtani AS, "Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tubing: a prospective randomized study", Am J Rhinol Allergy, 26(4), pp.332~334 (2012)[DOI]
- [URL]
- Mantel N, "Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease", J Natl Cancer Inst, 22(4), pp.719~748 (1959)
- [URL]
- Harbord RM, "A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies", Biostatistics, 8(2), pp.239~251 (2007)[DOI]
- Harugop AS, "Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective study", Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 60(4), pp.335~340 (2008)[DOI]
- Smirnov G, "Silicone tubing is not necessary after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective randomized study", Am J Rhinol, 22(2), pp.214~217 (2008)[DOI]
- Kakkar V, "Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone stent: a comparative study", Internet J Otorhinolaryngol, 9(1), pp.1~5 (2008)
- Chong KK, "Randomized trial on silicone intubation in endoscopic mechanical dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction", Ophthalmology, 120(10), pp.2139~2145 (2013)[DOI]
- Shashidhar KC, "Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone stenting: a comparative study", Al Ameen J Med Sci, 7(3), pp.244~247 (2014)
- Reddy YJ, "A comparative study of outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone stenting", IOSR J Dent Med Sci, 14(7), pp.82~85 (2015)
- Fayers T, "Bicanalicular silicone stents in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: results of a randomized clinical trial", Ophthalmology, 123(10), pp.2255~2259 (2016)[DOI]
- Rao SV, "Dacryocystorhinostomy stent insertion in initial endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy", Clin Rhinol An Int J, 9(3), pp.120~124 (2016)[DOI]
- Ahmad S, "Role of silicone stenting in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a comparative study", Int J Adv Integr Med Sci, 1(1), pp.4~6 (2016)
- Smitha SG, "Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone stent: a comparative study", J Med Sci Clin Res, 4(9), pp.12861~12864 (2016)
- Madge SN, "Intubation in routine dacryocystorhinostomy: why we do what we do", Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 37(6), pp.620~623 (2009)[DOI]
- Liang J, "Is postoperative stenting necessary in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy?", Laryngoscope, 123(11), pp.2589~2590 (2013)[DOI]
- Longari F, "Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation: 4 years retrospective study", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 273(8), pp.2079~2084 (2016)[DOI]
- Mohamad SH, "Long-term results of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with and without stenting", Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 95(3), pp.196~199 (2013)
- Mortimore S, "Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without silicone stenting", J R Coll Surg Edinb, 44(6), pp.371~373 (1999)
- Unlu HH, "Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without stents", Auris Nasus Larynx, 27(1), pp.65~71 (2000)[DOI]
- Zuercher B, "Analysis of functional and anatomic success following endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy", Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 120(4), pp.231~238 (2011)[DOI]
- Gibbs DC, "New probe for the intubation of lacrimal canaliculi with silicone rubber tubing", Br J Ophthalmol, 51(3), pp.198~ (1967)[DOI]
- Deng HY, "Comparative study of recessive spherical headed silicone intubation and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy under nasal endoscopy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction", Sci Rep, 7(1), pp.7734~ (2017)[DOI]
- Sterne JA, "Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials", BMJ, 343, pp.d4002~ (2011)[DOI]
- Knisely A, "Long-term outcomes in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy", Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 23(1), pp.53~58 (2015)
- Yeon JY, "Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without silicone stent", Acta Otolaryngol, 132(Suppl 1), pp.S77~S81 (2012)[DOI]