Surgical Results of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy and Lacrimal Trephination in Distal or Common Canalicular Obstruction
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives. To evaluate the surgical outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy followed by canalicular trephination and silicone stenting in patients with distal or common canalicular obstructions. Methods. The medical records of 29 patients (31 eyes) from January 2001 to December 2009 who underwent endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy followed by canalicular trephination and silicone tube insertion for the treatment of distal or common canalicular obstructions were retrospectively reviewed. The level of obstruction was confirmed by intraoperative probing. The outcome of the surgery was categorized as a complete success, partial success, or failure according to the functional and anatomic patency. Results. The average age of the patients was 52 years. The duration of silicone intubation ranged from 4 to 11 months with an average of 5.7±1.6 months. The follow-up period after stent removal ranged from 4 to 15 months with an average of 8.2±3.3 months. Complete success was achieved in 25 out of 31 eyes (80.6%), partial success in 4 out of 31eyes (12.9%), and failure in 2 out of 31 eyes (6.5%). Conclusion. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy followed by canalicular trephination and silicone stent intubation may be safe and considered as an initial treatment of patients with distal or common canalicular obstructions
Abstract
Objectives. To evaluate the surgical outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy followed by canalicular trephination and silicone stenting in patients with distal or common canalicular obstructions. Methods. The medical records of 29 patients (31 eyes) from January 2001 to December 2009 who underwent endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy followed by canalicular trephination and silicone tube insertion for the treatment of distal or common canalicular obstructions were retrospectively reviewed. The level of obstruction was confirmed by intraoperative probing. The outcome of the surgery was categorized as a complete success, partial success, or failure according to the functional and anatomic patency. Results. The average age of the patients was 52 years. The duration of silicone intubation ranged from 4 to 11 months with an average of 5.7±1.6 months. The follow-up period after stent removal ranged from 4 to 15 months with an average of 8.2±3.3 months. Complete success was achieved in 25 out of 31 eyes (80.6%), partial success in 4 out of 31eyes (12.9%), and failure in 2 out of 31 eyes (6.5%). Conclusion. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy followed by canalicular trephination and silicone stent intubation may be safe and considered as an initial treatment of patients with distal or common canalicular obstructions
참고문헌 (23)
- Jones LT, "An anatomical approach to problems of the eyelids and lacrimal apparatus", Arch Ophthalmol, 66(1), pp.111~124 (1961)
- Linberg JV, "Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a clinicopathologic report and biopsy technique", Ophthalmology, 93(8), pp.1055~1063 (1986)
- Jones LT, "The cure of epiphora due to canalicular disorders, trauma and surgical failures on the lacrimal passages", Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol, 66, pp.506~524 (1962)
- Rosen N, "Patient dissatisfaction after functionally successful conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with Jones tube", Am J Ophthalmol, 117(5), pp.636~642 (1994)
- Wearne MJ, "Retrograde intubation dacryocystorhinostomy for proximal and midcanalicular obstruction", Ophthalmology, 106(12), pp.2325~2328 (1999)
- McDonogh M, "Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy", J Laryngol Otol, 103(6), pp.585~587 (1989)
- Sisler HA, "A new ophthalmic microtrephine", Ophthalmic Surg, 21(9), pp.656~657 (1990)
- Sisler HA, "New minitrephine makes lacrimal canalicular rehabilitation an office procedure", Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 6(3), pp.203~206 (1990)
- Khoubian JF, "Trephination and silicone stent intubation for the treatment of canalicular obstruction: effect of the level of obstruction", Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 22(4), pp.248~252 (2006)
- Nemet AY, "Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with adjunctive mitomycin C for canalicular obstruction", Orbit, 26(2), pp.97~100 (2007)
- Keith CG, "Intubation of the lacrimal passages", Am J Ophthalmol, 65(1), pp.70~74 (1968)
- Pashby RC, "Silicone tube intubation of the lacrimal drainage system", Arch Ophthalmol, 97(7), pp.1318~1322 (1979)
- Dutton JJ, "Holmium laser canaliculoplasty", Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 12(3), pp.211~217 (1996)
- Kuchar A, "Endoscopic laser recanalisation of presaccal canalicular obstruction", Br J Ophthalmol, 83(4), pp.443~447 (1999)
- Wilhelm KE, "Nonsurgical fluoroscopically guided dacryocystoplasty of common canalicular obstructions", Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 23(1), pp.1~8 (2000)
- Yang SW, "Ballooning canaliculoplasty after lacrimal trephination in monocanalicular and common canalicular obstruction", Jpn J Ophthalmol, 52(6), pp.444~449 (2008)
- Yung MW, "Analysis of the results of surgical endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: effect of the level of obstruction", Br J Ophthalmol, 86(7), pp.792~794 (2002)
- Sprekelsen MB, "Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical technique and results", Laryngoscope, 106(2), pp.187~189 (1996)
- Tsirbas A, "Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps", Am J Ophthalmol, 135(1), pp.76~83 (2003)
- Unlu HH, "Comparison of surgical outcomes in primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation", Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 111(8), pp.704~709 (2002)
- Camara JG, "The safety and efficacy of mitomycin C in endonasal endoscopic laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy", Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 16(2), pp.114~118 (2000)
- Dolmetsch AM, "Nonlaser endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with adjunctive mitomycin C in nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults", Ophthalmology, 117(5), pp.1037~1040 (2010)
- Smirnov G, "Silicone tubing after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: is it necessary?", Am J Rhinol, 20(6), pp.600~602 (2006)