Cause and Management of Patients With Failed Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a well-established treatment method in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. However, there are a few reports about the overall management of failed endonasal DCR. We investigated the causes and management strategies of failed endonasal DCR. Methods. This retrospective review included 61 patients (61 eyes) who had undergone revision surgery by the same surgeon after failed endonasal DCR between January 2008 and December 2012. The appropriate revision method was determined after analysis of the etiology of failure by the fluorescein dye disappearance test, nasal endoscopy, lacrimal irrigation, and probing. The criteria for success of the revision surgery were defined by the passage of fluid without resistance upon lacrimal irrigation and normalization of the tear meniscus height. Results. The mean duration between the primary endonasal DCR and revision surgery was 15.3 months. The average follow-up period after revision surgery was 12.2 months. The most common cause of endoscopic revision surgery was membranous obstruction. Endoscopic revision surgery was performed in 48 patients, while lacrimal silicone tube intubation under endoscopy was performed in 13 patients. The most common indication for lacrimal silicone tube intubation was functional epiphora. The overall success rate of the revision surgery was 89%. Conclusion. The most common cause of failed endonasal DCR was membranous obstruction. When patients with failed endonasal DCR presented at the clinic, it is important to identify the cause of the failure. Revision surgery could increase the final success rate of endonasal DCR.
Abstract
Objectives. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a well-established treatment method in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. However, there are a few reports about the overall management of failed endonasal DCR. We investigated the causes and management strategies of failed endonasal DCR. Methods. This retrospective review included 61 patients (61 eyes) who had undergone revision surgery by the same surgeon after failed endonasal DCR between January 2008 and December 2012. The appropriate revision method was determined after analysis of the etiology of failure by the fluorescein dye disappearance test, nasal endoscopy, lacrimal irrigation, and probing. The criteria for success of the revision surgery were defined by the passage of fluid without resistance upon lacrimal irrigation and normalization of the tear meniscus height. Results. The mean duration between the primary endonasal DCR and revision surgery was 15.3 months. The average follow-up period after revision surgery was 12.2 months. The most common cause of endoscopic revision surgery was membranous obstruction. Endoscopic revision surgery was performed in 48 patients, while lacrimal silicone tube intubation under endoscopy was performed in 13 patients. The most common indication for lacrimal silicone tube intubation was functional epiphora. The overall success rate of the revision surgery was 89%. Conclusion. The most common cause of failed endonasal DCR was membranous obstruction. When patients with failed endonasal DCR presented at the clinic, it is important to identify the cause of the failure. Revision surgery could increase the final success rate of endonasal DCR.
참고문헌 (29)
- Woog JJ, "Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology", Ophthalmology, 108(12), pp.2369~2377 (2001)
- Leong SC, "A systematic review of outcomes after dacryocystorhinostomy in adults", Am J Rhinol Allergy, 24(1), pp.81~90 (2010)
- Hull S, "Success rates in powered endonasal revision surgery for failed dacryocystorhinostomy in a tertiary referral center", Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 29(4), pp.267~271 (2013)
- 이태수, "실패한 코경유눈물주머니코안연결술에서 교정수술의 결과", 대한안과학회지, 48(2), pp.186~192 (2007), 대한안과학회
- Nam Ju Kim, "Lacrimal Silicone Intubation for Anatomically Successful but Functionally Failed External Dacryocystorhinostomy", Korean Journal of Ophthalmology, 21(2), pp.70~73 (2007), 대한안과학회
- Shams PN, "Management of functional epiphora in patients with an anatomically patent dacryocystorhinostomy", JAMA Ophthalmol, 132(9), pp.1127~1132 (2014)
- Mathew MR, "Patient satisfaction in our initial experience with endonasal endoscopic non-laser dacryocystorhinostomy", Orbit, 23(2), pp.77~85 (2004)
- Metson R., "Endoscopic surgery for lacrimal obstruction", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 104(4), pp.473~479 (1991)
- Ragab SM, "Mitomycin C-enhanced revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 147(5), pp.937~942 (2012)
- Paik JS, "Comparison of endoscopic revision for failed primary external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy", Clin Experiment Ophthalmol, 41(2), pp.116~121 (2013)
- Weidenbecher M, "Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy:results in 56 patients", Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 103(5 Pt 1), pp.363~367 (1994)
- El-Guindy A, "Endoscopic revision surgery for recurrent epiphora occurring after external dacryocystorhinostomy", Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol., 109(4), pp.425~430 (2000)
- Zeldovich A, "Revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with betamethasone injection under assisted local anaesthetic", Orbit, 28(6), pp.328~331 (2009)
- Korkut AY, "A comparison of endonasal with external dacryocystorhinostomy in revision cases", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 268(3), pp.377~381 (2011)
- Choussy O, "Endoscopic revision of external dacryocystorhinostomy failure", Rhinology, 48(1), pp.104~107 (2010)
- Jordan DR, "Pyogenic granuloma following oculoplastic procedures : an imbalance in angiogenesis regulation?", Can J Ophthalmol, 36(5), pp.260~268 (2001)
- Apuhan T, "Effect of mitomycin C on endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy", J Craniofac Surg, 22(6), pp.2057~2059 (2011)
- Ozkiris M, "Effect of mitomycin C on revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy", J Craniofac Surg, 23(6), pp.e608~e610 (2012)
- Cheng SM, "Efficacy of mitomycin C in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis", PLoS One, 8(5), pp.e62737~ (2013)
- Ozsutcu M, "Transcanalicular revision surgery for failed dacryocystorhinostomy", Clin Ter, 164(6), pp.e485~e488 (2013)
- Derya K, "Endoscopic transcanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy : is it an alternative method to conventional external dacryocystorhinostomy?", Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 29(1), pp.15~17 (2013)
- Balikoglu-Yilmaz M, "Prospective comparison of 3 dacryocystorhinostomy surgeries:external versus endoscopic versus transcanalicular multidiode laser", Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 31(1), pp.13~18 (2015)
- Desiate A, "980nm diode lasers in oral and facial practice: current state of the science and art", Int J Med Sci, 6(6), pp.358~364 (2009)
- Kamel R, "Manometric measurement of lacrimal sac pressure after endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy", Acta Otolaryngol, 123(2), pp.325~329 (2003)
- Detorakis ET, "Watery eye following patent external DCR: an MR dacryocystography study", Orbit, 29(5), pp.239~243 (2010)
- Delaney YM, "Fluorescein transit test time and symptomatic outcomes after external dacryocystorhinostomy", Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 18(4), pp.281~284 (2002)
- Al-Qahtani AS., "Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tubing: a prospective randomized study", Am J Rhinol Allergy, 26(4), pp.332~334 (2012)
- Feng YF, "A meta-analysis of primary dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation", Can J Ophthalmol, 46(6), pp.521~527 (2011)
- Smirnov G, "Silicone tubing is not necessary after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy:a prospective randomized study", Am J Rhinol, 22(2), pp.214~217 (2008)