Her Posthumous Hope in George Eliot’s The Mill on the Floss and Edith Wharton’s The House of Mirth
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is to understand some literary solutions to feminist questions with two English novels, Geroge Eliot's The Mill on the Floss and Edith Wharton's The House of Mirth, which was published in 1905, some forty years later than The Mill on the Floss, in order to study the differences made on women's position in society and also to find out any progress or development has been accomplished in this area through the so-called brilliant industrialization achieved for the mankind during this period. In spite of several differences such as agricultural landscape in St. Ogg's, and industrialzed metropolitan area of New York, The Mill on the Floss and The House of Mirth are not quite different in their feminist statement. Even though the message of Edith Wharton is clearer, we cannot tell whether there is any progress between The Mill on the Floss and The House of Mirth.
Abstract
This study is to understand some literary solutions to feminist questions with two English novels, Geroge Eliot's The Mill on the Floss and Edith Wharton's The House of Mirth, which was published in 1905, some forty years later than The Mill on the Floss, in order to study the differences made on women's position in society and also to find out any progress or development has been accomplished in this area through the so-called brilliant industrialization achieved for the mankind during this period. In spite of several differences such as agricultural landscape in St. Ogg's, and industrialzed metropolitan area of New York, The Mill on the Floss and The House of Mirth are not quite different in their feminist statement. Even though the message of Edith Wharton is clearer, we cannot tell whether there is any progress between The Mill on the Floss and The House of Mirth.
참고문헌 (21)
- Austin, Jane, "Pride and Prejudice" (1980), Oxford UP
- Beer, Gillian, "Beyond Determinism: George Eliot and Virginia Woolf, In Women Writing and Writhing about Women" (1979), Croom Helm
- Byatt, A. S., "Introduction, In The Mill on the Floss" (1985), Penguin
- Cunliffe, Marcus, "The Literature of the United States" (1970), Penguin
- Dickens, Charles, "Great Expectations" (1963), Signet
- Eliot, George, "The Mill on the Floss" (1985), Penguin
- Fernando, Lloyd, "New Women, In The Late Victorian Novel" (1977), Pennsylvania State UP
- Gubar, Susan, "The Blank page' and the Issues of Female Creativity, In The New Feminist Criticism" (1985), Pantheon
- Harris, Margaret, "The Narrator of The Mill on the Floss, In Sydney Studies in English, Vol. 3" (1978), U of Sydney P
- Leavis, F. R., "The Great Tradition" (1986), Penguin
- Liddell, Robert, "The Novels of George Eliot" (1977), Duckworth
- Martin, Jay, "Harvests of Change" (1967), Prentice-Hall
- Moi, Toril, "Feminist Literary Criticism, In Modern Literary Theory" (1987), Batsford
- Newton, Judith Lowder, "Women, Power, and Subversion" (1981), Methuen
- Russ, Joanna, "What can a Heroine Do? Or Why Women Can't Write, In Images of Women in Fiction: Feminist Perspectives" (1972), Bowling Green U Popular P
- Said, Edward W., "The World, the Text and the Critic" (1984), Faber and Faber
- Showalter, Elaine, "A Literature of Their Own" (1977), Princeton UP
- Sukenick, Lynn, "On Women and Fiction, In The Authority of Experience" (1977), The U of Massachusetts P
- Wharton, Edith, "The House of Mirth" (1985), Penguin
- Wilkes, G. A., "The Mill on the Floss as Moral Fable?, In Sydney Studies in English, Vol. 11" (1986), U of Sydney P
- Wordsworth, William, "The Poetical Works of Wordsworth" (1961), Oxford UP