George Eliot’s Sociological Poetics in Dorothea’s Story
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Although acclaimed as George Eliot’s masterpiece, Middlemarch: A Study of Provincial Life (1871-72) has been attacked by feminists since shortly after it was serialized. The main cause of feminist criticism is that she portrays her heroine, Dorothea Brooke, in an androcentric viewpoint and describes her lived experiences through male discourses. In order to identify what such feminist criticism originates in, this article places the novel in the sociopolitical contexts where Dorothea lived while authoring herself, and then analyzes it with M. M. Bakhtin’s two important concepts, self-authoring and architectonics. As a result, Middlemarch has many shortcomings in the phases of the heroine’s self-authoring and eventually the architectonics. In case of self-authoring, Eliot does not fully explain Dorothea’s responses to her first husband and egoistic priest Edward Casaubon, and then her second husband and English-Polish dilettante Will Ladislaw until she reaches her ultimate marriage conclusions. Incessant authorial intervention obstructs the heroine’s smooth interactions with her two husbands. In addition, the novel does not provide any sufficient comments about Dorothea’s responses to Middlemarchers’ opinions even if handling their opinions in the heroine’s self-authoring influences the novel’s persuasiveness. Dorothea’s story has proved its own limitations by its frequent omissions and authorial intrusions. In Bakhtin’s terminology, Middlemarch does not properly contain I-for-myself, the-other-for-me, and I-for-the-other. It can be said that these shortcomings resulting from Eliot’s cross-dressing narrative have caused attacks by feminists.
Abstract
Although acclaimed as George Eliot’s masterpiece, Middlemarch: A Study of Provincial Life (1871-72) has been attacked by feminists since shortly after it was serialized. The main cause of feminist criticism is that she portrays her heroine, Dorothea Brooke, in an androcentric viewpoint and describes her lived experiences through male discourses. In order to identify what such feminist criticism originates in, this article places the novel in the sociopolitical contexts where Dorothea lived while authoring herself, and then analyzes it with M. M. Bakhtin’s two important concepts, self-authoring and architectonics. As a result, Middlemarch has many shortcomings in the phases of the heroine’s self-authoring and eventually the architectonics. In case of self-authoring, Eliot does not fully explain Dorothea’s responses to her first husband and egoistic priest Edward Casaubon, and then her second husband and English-Polish dilettante Will Ladislaw until she reaches her ultimate marriage conclusions. Incessant authorial intervention obstructs the heroine’s smooth interactions with her two husbands. In addition, the novel does not provide any sufficient comments about Dorothea’s responses to Middlemarchers’ opinions even if handling their opinions in the heroine’s self-authoring influences the novel’s persuasiveness. Dorothea’s story has proved its own limitations by its frequent omissions and authorial intrusions. In Bakhtin’s terminology, Middlemarch does not properly contain I-for-myself, the-other-for-me, and I-for-the-other. It can be said that these shortcomings resulting from Eliot’s cross-dressing narrative have caused attacks by feminists.
참고문헌 (29)
- Austen Zelda, "Why Feminist Critics Are Angry with George Eliot", College English, 37(6), pp.549~561 (1976)
- Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich, "The Dialogic Imagination", pp.259~422
- Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich, "Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics" (1993), UP of Minne
- Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich, "Art and Answerability" (1990), UP of Texas
- Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich, "Toward a Philosophy of the Act" (1993), UP of Texas
- Beer, Gillian, "George Eliot" (1986), UP of Indiana
- Booth, Wayne C., "Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics", pp.xiii~xxvii (1993), UP of Minnesota
- Clark, Katerina, "Mikhail Bakhtin" (1984), UP of Harvard
- Eliot, George, "George Eliot: Selected Essays, Poems and Other Writings", pp.332~338 (1990), Penguin Books
- Eliot, George, "George Eliot: Selected Essays, Poems and Other Writings", pp.320~323 (1990), Penguin Books
- Eliot, George, "Middlemarch" (1956), Houghton Mifflin
- Eliot, George, "Middlemarch" (1994), Penguin Books
- Eliot, George, "George Eliot: Selected Essays, Poems and Other Writings", pp.321~336 (1990), Penguin Books
- Eliot, George, "The George Eliot Letters. Vol. V" (1975), UP of Yale
- Eliot, George, "The George Eliot Letters. Vol. VII" (1975), UP of Yale
- Haight, Gordon Sherman, "Middlemarch", pp.v~xx (1956), Houghton Mifflin Company
- Hardy, Barbara, "The Appropriate Form: An Essay on the Novel" (2013), Bloomsbury
- Holquist, Michael, "Art and Answerability", pp.ix~xlix (1990), UP of Texas
- Hutton, R. H., "George Eliot: The Critical Heritage", pp.286~313 (1971), Routledge & Kegan Paul
- James, Henry, "George Eliot: The Critical Heritage", pp.353~359 (1971), Routledge & Kegan Paul
- Linton, Eliza Lynn, "My Literary Life" (1899), Hodder & Stoughton
- Lodge, David, "After Bakhtin: Essays on Fiction and Criticism", pp.45~56 (1990), Routledge
- MacCabe, Colin, "James Joyce and the Revolution of the Word" (1979), Barnes & Noble Books
- Millett, Kate, "Sexual Politics" (1989), Ballantine Books
- Morson, Gary Saul, "Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics" (1990), UP of Stanford
- Parkes, Bessie Rayner, "Essays on Women’s Work", pp.371~374 (1865), Alexander Strahan
- Simcox, Edith, "George Eliot: The Critical Heritage", pp.322~330 (1971), Routledge & Kegan Paul
- Teranishi, Masayuki, "Polyphony in Fiction: A Stylistic Analysis of Middlemarch, Nostromo, and Herzog" (2008), Peter Lang