본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

RCP 배출 시나리오와 SWAT 모형을 이용한 기후변화가 용담댐 유역의 수문요소에 미치는 영향 평가

Assessing Climate Change Impact on Hydrological Components of Yongdam Dam Watershed Using RCP Emission Scenarios and SWAT Model

2

조회

0

다운로드

23

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

This study was to evaluate the potential climate change impact on watershed hydrological components of evapotranspiration, surface runoff, lateral flow, return flow, and streamflow using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). For Yongdam dam watershed (930 km2), the SWAT model was calibrated for five years (2002-2006) and validated for three years (2004-2006) using daily streamflow data at three locations and daily soil moisture data at five locations. The Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) were 0.43-0.67 and 0.48-0.70 for streamflow, and 0.16-0.65 and 0.27-0.76 for soil moisture, respectively. For future evaluation, the HadGEM3-RA climate data by Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios were adopted. The biased future data were corrected using 30 years (1982-2011, baseline period) of ground weather data. The HadGEM3-RA 2080s (2060-2099) temperature and precipitation showed increase of +4.7 ℃ and +22.5 %, respectively based on the baseline data. The impacts of future climate change on the evapotranspiration, surface runoff, baseflow, and streamflow showed changes of +11.8 %, +36.8 %, +20.5 %, and +29.2 %, respectively. Overall, the future hydrologic results by RCP emission scenarios showed increase patterns due to the overall increase of future temperature and precipitation.

Abstract

This study was to evaluate the potential climate change impact on watershed hydrological components of evapotranspiration, surface runoff, lateral flow, return flow, and streamflow using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). For Yongdam dam watershed (930 km2), the SWAT model was calibrated for five years (2002-2006) and validated for three years (2004-2006) using daily streamflow data at three locations and daily soil moisture data at five locations. The Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) were 0.43-0.67 and 0.48-0.70 for streamflow, and 0.16-0.65 and 0.27-0.76 for soil moisture, respectively. For future evaluation, the HadGEM3-RA climate data by Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios were adopted. The biased future data were corrected using 30 years (1982-2011, baseline period) of ground weather data. The HadGEM3-RA 2080s (2060-2099) temperature and precipitation showed increase of +4.7 ℃ and +22.5 %, respectively based on the baseline data. The impacts of future climate change on the evapotranspiration, surface runoff, baseflow, and streamflow showed changes of +11.8 %, +36.8 %, +20.5 %, and +29.2 %, respectively. Overall, the future hydrologic results by RCP emission scenarios showed increase patterns due to the overall increase of future temperature and precipitation.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 안소라, "SWAT 모형을 이용한 미래 기후변화가 설마천 혼효림 유역의 증발산과 토양수분에 미치는 영향 평가", 한국수자원학회 논문집, 46(6), pp.569~583 (2013), 한국수자원학회
  2. Global change and global scenarios of water use and availability: An application of Water GAP 1.0, "Alcamo, J.", University of Kassel, Center for Environmental Systems Research, ~, pp.Report A9701 (1997)
  3. Crop evapotranspiration, Guidelines for computing crop water requirements, "Allen, R. G.", FAO, ~, pp.FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56 (1998)
  4. Ambroise, B., "Multicriterion validations of a semidistributed conceptual model of the water cycle in the Fecht catchment, Vosges, Massif. France", Water Resources Research, 31, pp.1467~1481 (1995)
  5. Arnold, J. G., "Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds", Journal of Hydrology, 176(1), pp.57~77 (1996)
  6. Arnold, J. G., "Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development", Journal of American Water Resources Association, 34(1), pp.73~89 (1998)
  7. Bastidas, L. A., "Parameter, structure, and model performance evaluation for land-surface schemes", Water Science and Applications, 6, pp.239~254 (2003)
  8. Carter, T. R., "IPCC-TGCIA guidelines on the use of scenario data for climate change impact and adaptation assessment", version 1, IPCC, Task Group on Scenarios for Impact Assessment, ~ (1999)
  9. Chow, V. T., "Applied Hydrology" (1988), McGraw-Hill
  10. Cunge, J. A., "On the subject of a flood propagation method (Muskingum method)", Journal of Hydraulics Research, 7(2), pp.205~230 (1969)
  11. 홍우용, "봄철 SWAT 모형의 산림 토양수분과 Terra MODIS 위성영상 NDVI와의 상관성 분석", 한국농공학회논문집, 51(2), pp.7~14 (2009), 한국농공학회
  12. Towards new scenarios for analysis of emissions, climate change, impacts and response strategies, "IPCC", Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ~ (2012)
  13. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, "IPCC", ~ (2013)
  14. Jang, J. S., "Introduction of hydrologic models and parameters", Korea National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage, 10(1), pp.95~102 (2003)
  15. 조형경, "설마천유역 혼효림에서 실측된 증발산과 토양수분을 이용한 SWAT모형의 적용성 평가", 한국농림기상학회지, 12(4), pp.289~297 (2010), 한국농림기상학회
  16. 정현교, "SWAT을 이용한 기후변화가 충주댐 및 조정지댐저수량에 미치는 영향 평가", 한국수자원학회 논문집, 46(12), pp.1235~1247 (2013), 한국수자원학회
  17. 김남원, "SWAT-K 모형을 이용한 설마천 유역의 수문성분 해석", 한국환경과학회지, 17(12), pp.1363~1372 (2008), 한국환경과학회
  18. Koren, V., "Use of soil moisture observations to improve parameter consistency in watershed calibration", Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 33, pp.1068~1080 (2008)
  19. Kuczera, G., "Assessment of hydrological parameter uncertainty and the worth of multi-response data", Water Resources Research, 34, pp.1481~1489 (1998)
  20. "Experimental watershed in Yongdam dam basin" (2008)[URL]
  21. 이보라, "수문생태모형 RHESSys의 평가: 두 복잡지형 유역에서의 모수화와 적용", 한국농림기상학회지, 9(4), pp.247~259 (2007), 한국농림기상학회
  22. 이용준, "SWAT 모형을 이용한 미래 기후변화 및 토지이용 변화에 따른 안성천 유역 수문 - 수질 변화 분석 (II)", 대한토목학회 논문집B, 28(6), pp.665~672 (2008), 대한토목학회
  23. Manguerra, H. B., "Hydrologic parameterization of watersheds for runoff prediction using SWAT", Journal of the American Resources Association, 34(5), pp.1149~1162 (1998)
  24. MLTM., "Water vision 2020", Ministry of Land, Transportation and Maritime Affairs, ~ (2006)
  25. Nash, J. E., "River flow forecasting though conceptual models: Part I, A discussion of principles", Journal of Hydrology, 10(3), pp.282~290 (1970)
  26. Soil and Water Assessment Tool:Theoretical documentation, Version 2000, "Neitsch, S. L.", Texas Water Resources Institute, ~, pp.TWRI Report TR‐191 (2000)
  27. Climate change scenario report 2011 to respond to the IPCC 5th Assessment Report, "NIMR", National Institute of Meteorological Research, ~ (2011)
  28. Park, J. Y., "Assessment of MIROC3.2 HiRes climate and CLUE-s land use change impacts on watershed hydrology using SWAT", Transactions of the ASABE, 54(5), pp.1713~1724 (2011)
  29. 박종윤, "기후변화가 충주댐 유역의 하천수질에 미치는 영향평가를 위한 유역 모델링", 한국수자원학회 논문집, 42(10), pp.877~889 (2009), 한국수자원학회
  30. Peterson, J. R., "Hydrologic calibration of the SWAT model in a watershed containing fragipan soils", Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34(3), pp.531~544 (1998)
  31. Saxton, K. E., "Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture", Soil Science of America Journal, 50(4), pp.1031~1036 (1986)
  32. Soil Survey Staff, "National Soil Survey Handbook", Title 430-VI, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Government Printing Office, ~ (1996)
  33. Sophocleous, M. A., "Integrated numerical modeling for basin-wide water management: The case of the Rattlesnake Creek basin in South-Central Kansas", Journal of Hydrology, 214(1), pp.179~196 (1999)
  34. USDA-SCS., "Section 4: Hydrology. In National Engineering Handbook", USDA Soil Conservation Service, ~ (1972)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)