The Effect of Task Type on Improving EFL Learners’ Awareness of Academic Register in L2 Vocabulary
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The literature on second language (L2) writing has reported that learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) lack register awareness, often incorrectly employing lexical items that are common in spoken English (i.e., informal words) in their academic writing, which requires formal register. EFL learners’ essays are informal and colloquial in style and tone as a result, which negatively influences the overall quality of their L2 writing. To address this issue, this study investigated the effect of task type on improving EFL learners’ awareness of academic register in L2 vocabulary. Participants included 139 Korean university students in 16-week academic English courses. Based on the finding that the depth of processing and the amount of repetition determine the effectiveness of vocabulary tasks (Laufer & Rozovski-Roitblat, 2011), various combinations of three types of tasks with different levels of depth of processing (i.e., matching, editing, and sentence-writing) and varying amounts of repetition (i.e., once vs. three times) were employed. Participants studied informal (spoken) and formal (written) vocabulary under five conditions (doing one matching task, doing three matching tasks, doing one editing task, doing three editing tasks, or doing one sentence-writing task) and completed a posttest. Analyses revealed the following results in relation to improving learners’ ability to distinguish between formal and informal words and to their use of formal words in academic writing: (1) the three matching and three editing tasks were significantly more effective than the one sentence-writing task, suggesting that repetition is more important than depth of processing; (2) the matching tasks were as effective as the editing tasks; and (3) students preferred the repetition of editing tasks. These results shed light on the issue of developing register awareness in L2 vocabulary use—a topic that has been underexplored in L2 lexical research. Ultimately, the findings point to a more effective instructional approach to increase L2 learners’ depth of vocabulary knowledge and improve their lexical use in academic writing.
Abstract
The literature on second language (L2) writing has reported that learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) lack register awareness, often incorrectly employing lexical items that are common in spoken English (i.e., informal words) in their academic writing, which requires formal register. EFL learners’ essays are informal and colloquial in style and tone as a result, which negatively influences the overall quality of their L2 writing. To address this issue, this study investigated the effect of task type on improving EFL learners’ awareness of academic register in L2 vocabulary. Participants included 139 Korean university students in 16-week academic English courses. Based on the finding that the depth of processing and the amount of repetition determine the effectiveness of vocabulary tasks (Laufer & Rozovski-Roitblat, 2011), various combinations of three types of tasks with different levels of depth of processing (i.e., matching, editing, and sentence-writing) and varying amounts of repetition (i.e., once vs. three times) were employed. Participants studied informal (spoken) and formal (written) vocabulary under five conditions (doing one matching task, doing three matching tasks, doing one editing task, doing three editing tasks, or doing one sentence-writing task) and completed a posttest. Analyses revealed the following results in relation to improving learners’ ability to distinguish between formal and informal words and to their use of formal words in academic writing: (1) the three matching and three editing tasks were significantly more effective than the one sentence-writing task, suggesting that repetition is more important than depth of processing; (2) the matching tasks were as effective as the editing tasks; and (3) students preferred the repetition of editing tasks. These results shed light on the issue of developing register awareness in L2 vocabulary use—a topic that has been underexplored in L2 lexical research. Ultimately, the findings point to a more effective instructional approach to increase L2 learners’ depth of vocabulary knowledge and improve their lexical use in academic writing.
참고문헌 (25)
- Bachman, L, "Fundamental considerations in language testing" (1990), Oxford University Press
- Biber, D, "Register, genre, and style" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Chapman, R, "Developing awareness of register in English", System, 10(2), pp.113~118 (1982)
- Craik, F, "Levels of processing : A framework for memory research", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), pp.671~684 (1972)
- Folse, K, "The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention", TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), pp.273~293 (2006)
- Gilquin, G, "Learner corpora : The missing link in EAP pedagogy", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(4), pp.319~335 (2007)
- Gilquin, G, "Proceedings of the Fourth Corpus Linguistics Conference", pp.1~12 (2007)
- Gilquin, G, "Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation", English Text Construction, 1(1), pp.41~61 (2008)
- Golonka, E, "The role of context and cognitive effort in vocabulary learning : A study of intermediate-level learners of Arabic", The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), pp.19~39 (2015)
- Halliday, M, "The linguistic science and language teaching" (1964), Indiana University Press
- Hulstijn, J, "Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition", Language Learning, 51(3), pp.539~558 (2001)
- 김정현, "Lexical Bundles in Korean College Students’ English Essays: A Corpus-based Comparative Study", 영어어문교육, 19(3), pp.157~179 (2013), 한국영어어문교육학회
- Laufer, B, "Eurosla Yearbook: Volumn 5", pp.223~250 (2005), John Benjamins
- Laufer, B, "Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement", Applied Linguistics, 22(1), pp.1~26 (2001)
- Laufer, B, "Incidental vocabulary acquisition: The effects of task type, word occurrence, and their combination", Language Teaching Research, 15(4), pp.391~411 (2011)
- Lu, M, "Effects of four vocabulary exercises on facilitating learning vocabulary meaning, form, and use", TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), pp.167~176 (2013)
- McCarthy, M, "Academic vocabulary in use" (2016), Cambridge University Press
- Nassaji, H, "Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs", Language Teaching Research, 14(4), pp.397~419 (2010)
- Nation, P, "Learning vocabulary in another language" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Richards, J, "The role of vocabulary teaching", TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), pp.77~89 (1976)
- Rundell, M, "Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners" (2007), Macmillan Education
- Schmidt, R, "Motor learning and performance : From principles to practice" (1991), Human Kinetics Books
- Schmitt, N, "Instructed second language vocabulary learning", Language Teaching Research, 12(3), pp.329~363 (2008)
- Sobel, H, "Spacing effects in real-world classroom vocabulary learning", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), pp.763~767 (2011)
- 윤충일, "Writing Like Speaking: Spoken Register Features in Korean EFL Learners' Argumentative Writing", 응용언어학, 31(4), pp.153~179 (2015), 한국응용언어학회