본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Role of Task Types and Prior Word Knowledge in Incidental Vocabulary Learning

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The current study tried to verify the role of the task-induced involvement load (Laufer & Hulstijn, 2001) in vocabulary learning. This study was conducted with 180 Korean EFL university students over a month. The general proficiency level of the participants was intermediate low and low levels; however, in this study the participants were classified into three levels based on the amount of prior word knowledge (the results of the pre-test) about the target words that they are expected to learn incidentally through task performance. Three types of tasks inducing different levels of involvement load were randomly distributed to the participants: reading (1), reading and gap-filling (2), and unscrambling words (3). A post vocabulary test was carried out twice to investigate the participants’ immediate learning outcomes and delayed retention effect: the 1st time just after and the 2nd time three weeks after the treatment. The results revealed that task types did not influence the learners’ incidental vocabulary learning regardless of the time interval whereas the learners’ different amount of prior word knowledge affected their immediate recall. In addition, no interaction effect was found between task types and prior word knowledge. The findings will be discussed more analytically, and some pedagogical implications will be presented accordingly.

Abstract

The current study tried to verify the role of the task-induced involvement load (Laufer & Hulstijn, 2001) in vocabulary learning. This study was conducted with 180 Korean EFL university students over a month. The general proficiency level of the participants was intermediate low and low levels; however, in this study the participants were classified into three levels based on the amount of prior word knowledge (the results of the pre-test) about the target words that they are expected to learn incidentally through task performance. Three types of tasks inducing different levels of involvement load were randomly distributed to the participants: reading (1), reading and gap-filling (2), and unscrambling words (3). A post vocabulary test was carried out twice to investigate the participants’ immediate learning outcomes and delayed retention effect: the 1st time just after and the 2nd time three weeks after the treatment. The results revealed that task types did not influence the learners’ incidental vocabulary learning regardless of the time interval whereas the learners’ different amount of prior word knowledge affected their immediate recall. In addition, no interaction effect was found between task types and prior word knowledge. The findings will be discussed more analytically, and some pedagogical implications will be presented accordingly.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Anderson, J. R., "Cognitive psychology and its implications" (1995), Freeman
  2. Craik, F. I. M., "Levels of processing : A framework for memory research", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), pp.671~684 (1972)
  3. Craik, F. I. M., "Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory", Journal of Experimental Psychology; General, 104(3), pp.286~294 (1975)
  4. Ellis, R., "Introduction : Investigating form-focused instruction", Language Learning, 51(1), pp.1~46 (2001)
  5. Folse, K. S., "The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention", TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), pp.273~293 (2006)
  6. Gass, S. M., "Second language acquisition: An introductory course" (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum
  7. Hulstijn, J. H., "Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition", Language Learning, 51(3), pp.539~558 (2001)
  8. Keating, G. D., "Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language : The involvement load hypothesis on trial", Language Teaching Research, 12(3), pp.365~386 (2008)
  9. 김혜진, "과업 유발 관여도와 능숙도가 중학교 영어 학습자의 어휘 학습에 미치는 영향", Studies in English Education, 22(4), pp.177~201 (2017), 글로벌영어교육학회[DOI]
  10. 김형선, "Vocabulary learning and task-induced involvement", 응용언어학, 26(4), pp.183~211 (2010), 한국응용언어학회
  11. 김지영, "과제 관여도와 학습자의 영어능숙도가 영어어휘 학습에 미치는 효과", 영어교육연구, 27(3), pp.125~149 (2015), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
  12. 김성애, "Some Reflections on Task-Based Language Teachingin a High School EFL Class", 영어교과교육, 12(3), pp.283~302 (2013), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
  13. Kim, Y. J., "The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition", Language Learning, 58(2), pp.285~325 (2008)
  14. Laufer, B., "Vocabulary acquisition in a second language : Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence", Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), pp.567~587 (2003)
  15. Laufer, B., "Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language : The construct of task-induced involvement", Applied Linguistics, 22(1), pp.1~26 (2001)
  16. 이은혜, "영화를 활용한 명시적・암시적 어휘학습이학습자의 어휘지식에 미치는 영향", 영어교과교육, 17(2), pp.75~92 (2018), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
  17. Lee, J. W., "The relative contribution of L2 language proficiency and L1 reading ability to L2 reading performance : A test of the threshold hypothesis in an EFL context", TESOL Quarterly, 31(4), pp.713~739 (1997)
  18. Nation, I. S. P., "Learning vocabulary in another language" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  19. Paas, F., "Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem solving skills : A cognitive-load approach", Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), pp.122~133 (1994)
  20. Richards, J. C., "Methodology in language teaching" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  21. Robinson, P., "The cognitive hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning", Second Language Studies, 21(2), pp.45~105 (2003)
  22. Rott, S., "The effect of frequency of input-enhancements on word learning and text comprehension", Language Learning, 57(2), pp.165~199 (2007)
  23. Skehan, P., "A framework for the implementation of task based instruction", Applied Linguistics, 17(1), pp.38~62 (1996)
  24. 성현미, "Task-Induced Involvement Load in Korean EFL Incidental Vocabulary Learning", 언어연구, 29(2), pp.269~296 (2013), 한국현대언어학회[DOI]
  25. 성현미, "Task-induced involvement load and low-level learners’ vocabulary learning", 현대영어교육, 17(4), pp.1~24 (2016), 현대영어교육학회
  26. Sweller, J., "Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design", Learning and Instruction, 44(4), pp.295~312 (1994)
  27. Xiahohui, X., "An empirical study on the effect of task on L2 incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading", Asian Social Science, 6(7), pp.126~131 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)