<<주역>> 임괘(臨卦) “팔월(八月)”에 대한 조선과 중국의 삼정(三正)과 12벽괘(辟卦) 논란

Abstract

This paper is an article that explored Three kinds of calendars(三正) and Twelve monarchs trigrams(12辟卦) debate that took place in China and Joseon dynasty(朝鮮) for “August” Overseeing I‒ching(<<周易>> 臨卦 8月) In China, the trend of the approach to the “August” Overseeing I‒ching(<<周易>> 臨卦 8월) is three styles, that’s Three kinds of calendars(三正) and Twelve monarchs trigrams(12辟卦) and others(其他易理). The scholar of Han dynasty(漢代) claims Withdrawal(遯卦) as the calendars of Chou dynasty(周曆). The scholar of Tang dynasty(唐代) claims Obstrution(否卦) as the calendars of Yin dynasty(殷曆). The scholar of Sung dynasty(宋代) claims Withdrawal(遯卦) as the calendars of Chou dynasty(周曆), claims Overseeing(觀卦) as the calendars of Hsia dynasty(夏曆) and others. The scholar of Joseon dynasty(朝鮮) was the sign to move away from thinking of China. Typically Kwon Geun(權近) saw Three kinds of calendars(三正)과 Twelve monarchs trigrams.(12辟卦) with ancillary issues had tried to solve the problem of the “August” Overseeing I‒ching(<<周易>> 臨卦 8月) as Yin‒Yang(陰陽). Jeong(丁若鏞) is particularly telling the calendars of Chou dynasty(周曆) with the mutation of I‒ching(變易論), Lee(李炳憲) said that this “August” Overseeing I‒ching(<<주역>> 臨卦 8月) as a makeshift of Twelve monarchs trigrams(12벽괘 변통론). From Kwon Geun to Lee, This attitude can be called a cross‒section of the original spirit of Joseon dynasty(朝鮮) outside the Chinese thought.