The Results of Evisceration with Primary Porous Implant Placement in Patients with Endophthalmitis
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To assess the results and long-term prognosis of evisceration with primary porous implant placement in patients with endophthalmitis. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to review the files of 27 patients (29 eyes) with endophthalmitis who underwent evisceration with primary porous implant placement from January 1997 to December 2007 at St. Mary’s Hospital and Kangnam St. Mary’s Hospital. The mean follow-up period was 12.24 months (range, 3 to 89months) and the mean age of the patients was 63.6 years (range, 33 to 89 years). Results: During the surgical procedure, primary implant placement was successfully completed, and any postoperative infection or inflammation rapidly resolved in all 27 patients (29 eyes). One of two porous implant materials was used. Hydroxyapatite was inserted in 14 eyes and Medpor was inserted in 15 eyes. Delayed implant exposure was noted in 1 eye, which was treated by inserting a hydroxyapatite implant 18 months after the first surgery. This was well treated by a preserved scleral graft. Implant infection was noted in 1 other eye at 20 days after the first surgery. All other minor complications healed without sequelae. Conclusions: Evisceration with primary porous implant placement as the treatment for recalcitrant endophthalmitis resulted in rapid resolution of any infection and inflammation. Implant exposure and infection occurred in only 2eyes, and these problems were well treated without long-term sequelae. Therefore, evisceration with primary porous implant placement is a treatment option for patients with endophthalmitis.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the results and long-term prognosis of evisceration with primary porous implant placement in patients with endophthalmitis. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to review the files of 27 patients (29 eyes) with endophthalmitis who underwent evisceration with primary porous implant placement from January 1997 to December 2007 at St. Mary’s Hospital and Kangnam St. Mary’s Hospital. The mean follow-up period was 12.24 months (range, 3 to 89months) and the mean age of the patients was 63.6 years (range, 33 to 89 years). Results: During the surgical procedure, primary implant placement was successfully completed, and any postoperative infection or inflammation rapidly resolved in all 27 patients (29 eyes). One of two porous implant materials was used. Hydroxyapatite was inserted in 14 eyes and Medpor was inserted in 15 eyes. Delayed implant exposure was noted in 1 eye, which was treated by inserting a hydroxyapatite implant 18 months after the first surgery. This was well treated by a preserved scleral graft. Implant infection was noted in 1 other eye at 20 days after the first surgery. All other minor complications healed without sequelae. Conclusions: Evisceration with primary porous implant placement as the treatment for recalcitrant endophthalmitis resulted in rapid resolution of any infection and inflammation. Implant exposure and infection occurred in only 2eyes, and these problems were well treated without long-term sequelae. Therefore, evisceration with primary porous implant placement is a treatment option for patients with endophthalmitis.
참고문헌 (13)
- O’Donnell BA, "Enucleation versus evisceration", Clin Experiment Ophthalmol, 33, pp.5~9 (2005)
- Viswanathan P, "UK national survey of enucleation, evisceration and orbital implant trends", Br J Ophthalmol, 91, pp.616~619 (2007)
- Abel AD, "Enucleation with primary implant insertion for treatment of recalcitrant endophthalmitis and panophthalmitis", Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 21, pp.220~226 (2005)
- Remullar HD, "Complications of porous spherical orbital implants", Ophthalmology, 102, pp.586~593 (1995)
- Blaydon SM, "The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases", Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 19, pp.364~371 (2003)
- Tawfik HA, "Evisceration with primary implant placement in patients with endophthalmitis", Ophthalmology, 114, pp.1100~1103 (2007)
- Dresner SC, "Primary implant placement with evisceration in patients with endophthalmitis", Ophthalmology, 107, pp.1661~1664 (2000)
- Meritt K, "Implant site infection rates with porous and dense materials", J Biomed Mater Res, 13, pp.101~108 (1979)
- 선덕영, "노출된 다공성 안와삽입물의 치료", 대한안과학회지, 45(9), pp.1409~1419 (2004), 대한안과학회
- 김정열, "안내염 환자에서 안구적출술 또는 안구내용제거술을 시행하게 되는 위험 인자", 대한안과학회지, 48(10), pp.1362~1368 (2007), 대한안과학회
- 김동수, "다공성 안와 삽입물의 노출빈도", 대한안과학회지, 44(12), pp.2711~2719 (2003), 대한안과학회
- Migliori ME, "Enucleation versus evisceration", Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 13, pp.298~302 (2002)
- Burstine MA, "Primary implant placement with evisceration", Ophthalmology, 107, pp.1664~1665 (2000)
