Clinical Usefulness of Binocular Multifocal Electroretinography in Patients with Monocular Macular Disease
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of binocular multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) by comparing results with conventional monocular mfERG in patients with monocular macular disease. Methods: mfERG testing was conducted on 32 patients with monocular macular disease and 30 normal subjects. An initial mfERG was simultaneously recorded from both eyes with two recording electrodes under binocular stimulation. A second mfERG was subsequently recorded with conventional monocular stimulation. Amplitudes and implicit times of each ring response of the binocular and monocular recordings were compared. Ring ratios of the binocular and monocular recording were also compared. Results: In the macular disease group, there were no statistical differences in amplitude or implicit time for each of the five concentric rings between the monocular and binocular recordings. However, with binocular simulation, the ring ratios (ring 1 / ring 4, ring 1 / ring 5) were significantly reduced in the affected eye. In the normal control group, there were no statistical differences in any parameters between the monocular and binocular recordings. Conclusions: Binocular mfERG could be a good alternative to the conventional monocular test. In addition,given that the test needs stable fixation of the affected eye during the binocular test, the reliability of the test results could be improved, especially for patients with monocular macular disease
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of binocular multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) by comparing results with conventional monocular mfERG in patients with monocular macular disease. Methods: mfERG testing was conducted on 32 patients with monocular macular disease and 30 normal subjects. An initial mfERG was simultaneously recorded from both eyes with two recording electrodes under binocular stimulation. A second mfERG was subsequently recorded with conventional monocular stimulation. Amplitudes and implicit times of each ring response of the binocular and monocular recordings were compared. Ring ratios of the binocular and monocular recording were also compared. Results: In the macular disease group, there were no statistical differences in amplitude or implicit time for each of the five concentric rings between the monocular and binocular recordings. However, with binocular simulation, the ring ratios (ring 1 / ring 4, ring 1 / ring 5) were significantly reduced in the affected eye. In the normal control group, there were no statistical differences in any parameters between the monocular and binocular recordings. Conclusions: Binocular mfERG could be a good alternative to the conventional monocular test. In addition,given that the test needs stable fixation of the affected eye during the binocular test, the reliability of the test results could be improved, especially for patients with monocular macular disease
참고문헌 (24)
- Sutter EE, "The photopic luminance response", Vision Res, 32, pp.433~446 (1992)
- 안용석, "중심성장액맥락망막병증에서 다국소 망막전위도 소견", 대한안과학회지, 44(10), pp.11~2277 (2003), 대한안과학회
- 강재훈, "특발성 망막전막 제거술 전후의 다국소 망막전위도 비교에 대한 연구", 대한안과학회지, 49(1), pp.104~110 (2008), 대한안과학회
- 김동규, "황반원공 환자에서 수술 후 다국소 망막전위도의 변화에 대한 연구", 대한안과학회지, 46(8), pp.1351~1360 (2005), 대한안과학회
- 이관훈, "당뇨황반부종에서 다국소 망막전위도검사와 치료 후 시력과의 상관관계", 대한안과학회지, 51(1), pp.29~34 (2010), 대한안과학회
- 성미선, "당뇨황반부종에서 망막두께분석기로 측정한 망막두께와 다국소망막전위도의 반응의 연관성", 대한안과학회지, 47(9), pp.1401~1409 (2006), 대한안과학회
- Karanjia R, "Electrophysiological effects of intravitreal Avastin(bevacizumab)in the treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration", Br J Ophthalmol, 92, pp.1248~1252 (2008)
- Chisholm JA, "The impact of fixation on the multifocal electroretinogram", Doc Ophthalmol, 102, pp.131~139 (2001)
- Winn BJ, "Interpreting the multifocal visual evoked potential: the effects of refractive errors, cataracts, and fixation errors", Br J Ophthalmol, 89, pp.340~344 (2005)
- Hood DC, "ISCEV standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography(mfERG)(2011 edition)", Doc Ophthalmol, 124, pp.1~13 (2012)
- Lyons JS, "Detection of early hydroxychloroquine retinal toxicity enhanced by ring ratio analysis of multifocal electroretinography", Am J Ophthalmol, 143, pp.801~809 (2007)
- Maturi RK, "Electrophysiologic findings after intravitreal bevacizumab(Avastin)treatment", Retina, 26, pp.270~274 (2006)
- Palmowski AM, "Influence of photodynamic therapy in choroidal neovascularization on focal retinal function assessed with the multifocal electroretinogram and perimetry", Ophthalmology, 109, pp.1788~1792 (2002)
- Chu PH, "Effects of unsteady fixation on multifocal electroretinogram(mfERG)", Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 244, pp.1273~1282 (2006)
- Crossland MD, "Preferred retinal locus development in patients with macular disease", Ophthalmology, 112, pp.1579~1585 (2005)
- Ishiko S, "Paradoxical improvement of visual acuity in macular disease", Curr Eye Res, 35, pp.651~656 (2010)
- Kabanarou SA, "Gaze changes with binocular versus monocular viewing in age-related macular degeneration", Ophthalmology, 113, pp.2251~2258 (2006)
- Gundogan FC, "Intra-sessional and inter-sessional variability of multifocal electroretinogram", Doc Ophthalmol, 117, pp.175~183 (2008)
- Tuzson R, "Role of multifocal electroretinography in the diagnosis of idiopathic macular hole", Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 51, pp.1666~1670 (2010)
- Lyons JS, "Using multifocal ERG ring ratios to detect and follow Plaquenil retinal toxicity: a review. Review of mfERG ring ratios in Plaquenil toxicity", Doc Ophthalmol, 118, pp.29~36 (2009)
- Friedman DS, "Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States", Arch Ophthalmol, 122, pp.564~572 (2004)
- Raz D, "The effect of contrast and luminance on mfERG responses in a monkey model of glaucoma", Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 43, pp.2027~2035 (2002)
- Kim CB, "Effects of reference electrode location on monopolar-derived multifocal electroretinograms in cynomolgus monkeys", Doc Ophthalmol, 111, pp.113~125 (2005)
- Fortune B, "Decline of photopic multifocal electroretinogram responses with age is due primarily to preretinal optical factors", J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis, 19, pp.173~184 (2002)