본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Myopic Open-angle Glaucoma Prevalence in Northeast Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Population-based Studies

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류안과학

초록

Purpose: Investigation of myopic open-angle glaucoma (OAG) prevalence in Northeast Asia by systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Systematic PubMed, Embase and Cochrane database searches for Northeast Asian population-based studiespublished up to 30 November 2020 and reporting on myopia and OAG diagnosis. By random-effect models, pooled OAGprevalence in a myopic population and pooled myopic OAG prevalence in a general population were generated, with 95%confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The meta-analysis encompassed five population-based studies in four countries (12,830 individuals, including 7,723patients with myopia and 1,112 patients with OAG). In a myopic population, OAG prevalence was 4.10% (95% CI, 3.00–5.70;I2 = 93%); in a general population, myopic OAG prevalence was 1.10% (95% CI, 0.60–1.70; I2 = 94%). A visual examination offunnel plot symmetry raised a suspicion of publication bias. Notwithstanding, Begg and Mazumbar’s adjusted rank correlationtest showed no such evidence (p = 0.6242). Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis returned an estimate of OAG prevalence in a myopic Northeast Asianpopulation. Our findings will inform future glaucoma studies as well as public health guidelines for Northeast Asian populations.

Abstract

Purpose: Investigation of myopic open-angle glaucoma (OAG) prevalence in Northeast Asia by systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Systematic PubMed, Embase and Cochrane database searches for Northeast Asian population-based studiespublished up to 30 November 2020 and reporting on myopia and OAG diagnosis. By random-effect models, pooled OAGprevalence in a myopic population and pooled myopic OAG prevalence in a general population were generated, with 95%confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The meta-analysis encompassed five population-based studies in four countries (12,830 individuals, including 7,723patients with myopia and 1,112 patients with OAG). In a myopic population, OAG prevalence was 4.10% (95% CI, 3.00–5.70;I2 = 93%); in a general population, myopic OAG prevalence was 1.10% (95% CI, 0.60–1.70; I2 = 94%). A visual examination offunnel plot symmetry raised a suspicion of publication bias. Notwithstanding, Begg and Mazumbar’s adjusted rank correlationtest showed no such evidence (p = 0.6242). Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis returned an estimate of OAG prevalence in a myopic Northeast Asianpopulation. Our findings will inform future glaucoma studies as well as public health guidelines for Northeast Asian populations.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. Dolgin E, "The myopia boom", Nature, 519, pp.276~278 (2015)
  2. Holden BA, "Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050", Ophthalmology, 123, pp.1036~1042 (2016)
  3. Quigley HA, "The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020", Br J Ophthalmol, 90, pp.262~267 (2006)
  4. Mastropasqua L, "Prevalence of myopia in open angle glaucoma", Eur J Ophthalmol, 2, pp.33~35 (1992)
  5. Boland MV, "Risk factors and open-angle glaucoma : classification and application", J Glaucoma, 16, pp.406~418 (2007)
  6. Marcus MW, "Myopia as a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Ophthalmology, 118, pp.1989~1994 (2011)
  7. Ahnul Ha, "Degree of Myopia and Glaucoma Risk: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis", American Journal of Ophthalmology, 236, pp.107~119 (2021), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  8. Lacroix A, "Eye pressure in progressive high myopia in adults", Ann Ocluist, 159, pp.730~ (1922)
  9. Diaz-Dominguez D, "On the relations of severe myopia and ocular hypertension", Ann Ocul(Paris), 194, pp.597~606 (1961)
  10. Podos SM, "High myopia and primary open-angle glaucoma", Am J Ophthalmol, 62, pp.1038~1043 (1966)
  11. Stroup DF, "Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group", JAMA, 283, pp.2008~2012 (2000)
  12. Moher D, "Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses : the PRISMA statement", PLoS Med, 6, pp.e1000097~ (2009)
  13. Sullivan GM, "Irb 101", J Grad Med Educ, 3, pp.5~6 (2011)
  14. Higgins JP, "Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis", Stat Med, 21, pp.1539~1558 (2002)
  15. Higgins JP, "Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses", BMJ, 327, pp.557~560 (2003)
  16. Egger M, "Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test", BMJ, 315, pp.629~634 (1997)
  17. Begg CB, "Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias", Biometrics, 50, pp.1088~1101 (1994)
  18. (2018)[URL]
  19. He J, "Prevalence and risk factors of primary open-angle glaucoma in a city of Eastern China: a population-based study in Pudong New District, Shanghai", BMC Ophthalmol, 15, pp.134~ (2015)
  20. Xu L, "High myopia and glaucoma susceptibility the Beijing Eye Study", Ophthalmology, 114, pp.216~220 (2007)
  21. Suzuki Y, "Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma in a Japanese population : the Tajimi Study", Ophthalmology, 113, pp.1613~1617 (2006)
  22. Kim KE, "Prevalence, awareness, and risk factors of primary open-angle glaucoma: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008-2011", Ophthalmology, 123, pp.532~541 (2016)
  23. Perera SA, "Refractive error, axial dimensions, and primary open-angle glaucoma: the Singapore Malay Eye Study", Arch Ophthalmol, 128, pp.900~905 (2010)
  24. Morgan IG, "Myopia", Lancet, 379, pp.1739~1748 (2012)
  25. Shimizu N, "Refractive errors and factors associated with myopia in an adult Japanese population", Jpn J Ophthalmol, 47, pp.6~12 (2003)
  26. Li SM, "Design, methodology and baseline data of a school-based cohort study in Central China: the Anyang Childhood Eye Study", Ophthalmic Epidemiol, 20, pp.348~359 (2013)
  27. ResnikoffS, "Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002", Bull World Health Organ, 82, pp.844~851 (2004)
  28. Pan CW, "Differential associations of myopia with major age-related eye diseases : the Singapore Indian Eye Study", Ophthalmology, 120, pp.284~291 (2013)
  29. Shen L, "The association of refractive error with glaucoma in a multiethnic population", Ophthalmology, 123, pp.92~101 (2016)
  30. Wang YX, "Prevalence of glaucoma in North China : the Beijing Eye Study", Am J Ophthalmol, 150, pp.917~924 (2010)
  31. Iwase A, "The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi Study", Ophthalmology, 111, pp.1641~1648 (2004)
  32. Ramakrishnan R, "Glaucoma in a rural population of southern India : the Aravind comprehensive eye survey", Ophthalmology, 110, pp.1484~1490 (2003)
  33. Liang YB, "Prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma in a rural adult Chinese population : the Handan eye study", Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 52, pp.8250~8257 (2011)
  34. Jiang X, "Baseline risk factors that predict the development of open-angle glaucoma in a population : the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study", Ophthalmology, 119, pp.2245~2253 (2012)
  35. Leske MC, "Risk factors for incident open-angle glaucoma : the Barbados Eye Studies", Ophthalmology, 115, pp.85~93 (2008)
  36. Rudnicka AR, "Ethnic differences in the prevalence of myopia and ocular biometry in 10- and 11-year-old children: the Child Heart and Health Study in England (CHASE)", Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 51, pp.6270~6276 (2010)
  37. Wong TY, "Refractive errors, intraocular pressure, and glaucoma in a white population", Ophthalmology, 110, pp.211~217 (2003)
  38. Kuzin AA, "Ocular biometry and open-angle glaucoma : the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study", Ophthalmology, 117, pp.1713~1719 (2010)
  39. Han SB, "Prevalence and risk factors of myopia in adult Korean population : Korea national health and nutrition examination survey 2013-2014(KNHANES VI)", PLoS One, 14, pp.e0211204~ (2019)
  40. Sawada A, "Refractive errors in an elderly Japanese population : the Tajimi study", Ophthalmology, 115, pp.363~370 (2008)
  41. Kempen JH, "The prevalence of refractive errors among adults in the United States, Western Europe, and Australia", Arch Ophthalmol, 122, pp.495~505 (2004)
  42. Rucker G, "Undue reliance on I(2) in assessing heterogeneity may mislead", BMC Med Res Methodol, 8, pp.79~ (2008)
  43. Easterbrook PJ, "Publication bias in clinical research", Lancet, 337, pp.867~872 (1991)
  44. Loyo-Berrios NI, "Primary-open glaucoma and myopia : a narrative review", WMJ, 106, pp.85~89 (2007)
  45. Chang RT, "Myopia and glaucoma : diagnostic and therapeutic challenges", Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 24, pp.96~101 (2013)
  46. Jonas JB, "High myopia and glaucoma-like optic neuropathy", Asia Pac J Ophthalmol(Phila), 9, pp.234~238 (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)