본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

컴퓨터프로그램보호법상의 기술적 보호조치의 무력화에 대한 형사책임

Criminal Liability for Circumvention against Technological Protection Measures

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The requirement for anti-circumvention laws was globalised in 1996 with the creation of the WIPO Copyright Treaty. In Korea, the Copyright Act and Computer Program Protection Act implemented the treaty provisions regarding the circumvention of some technological barriers to copying intellectual property. The Prohibition of circumvention on technical measures which effectively controls access to copyrighted works has enacted in various countries. Copyright system in Korea has the provisions to protect technical measures attached digital information. Thus, if there is some “technological measure that effectively controls access to a work”, it is illegal to circumvent that measure. While the conduct to circumvention a technical measures for oneself is prohibited by Computer Program Protection Act in Korea, Copyright Act in Korea has no provision to prohibition of this conduct. In this case 2004do2743, the High Court found that the use of mod chips into Playstation game consoles for the sole purpose of circumventing a coding protection system designed to prevent unauthorised games from being played was illgal. However Access code was not a “technological protection measure” because it did not prevent or inhibit the making of an illegal copy of a game. Access code only prevented the playing of the illegal game. The Boot rom and access code were not designed to prevent the infringement of copyright in the computer game. Finally, a copy protection technical measures can be protected by law but an access protection technical measures can't be protected. The conduction to circumvention on a access protection technical measures and on a copy protection technical measures for oneself are regally permitted. If not, there is a copyright holder-oriented interpretation about Copyright Act.

Abstract

The requirement for anti-circumvention laws was globalised in 1996 with the creation of the WIPO Copyright Treaty. In Korea, the Copyright Act and Computer Program Protection Act implemented the treaty provisions regarding the circumvention of some technological barriers to copying intellectual property. The Prohibition of circumvention on technical measures which effectively controls access to copyrighted works has enacted in various countries. Copyright system in Korea has the provisions to protect technical measures attached digital information. Thus, if there is some “technological measure that effectively controls access to a work”, it is illegal to circumvent that measure. While the conduct to circumvention a technical measures for oneself is prohibited by Computer Program Protection Act in Korea, Copyright Act in Korea has no provision to prohibition of this conduct. In this case 2004do2743, the High Court found that the use of mod chips into Playstation game consoles for the sole purpose of circumventing a coding protection system designed to prevent unauthorised games from being played was illgal. However Access code was not a “technological protection measure” because it did not prevent or inhibit the making of an illegal copy of a game. Access code only prevented the playing of the illegal game. The Boot rom and access code were not designed to prevent the infringement of copyright in the computer game. Finally, a copy protection technical measures can be protected by law but an access protection technical measures can't be protected. The conduction to circumvention on a access protection technical measures and on a copy protection technical measures for oneself are regally permitted. If not, there is a copyright holder-oriented interpretation about Copyright Act.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 문용호, "디지털저작물과 기술적 보호조치", 정보법학, pp.3~ (2002)
  2. 멀티미디어시대의 저작권 대책 최종보고서, "저작권심의조정위원회", 134~, pp.저작권연구자료 25 (1997)
  3. 이성우, "기술적 보호조치에 있어서 접근통제조치의 문제점에 관한 소고", 경성법학, pp.231~ (2007)
  4. 문용호, "디지털저작물과 기술적 보호조치", 정보법학, pp.137~138 (2002)
  5. 최성준, "기술적 보호조치 무력화 행위에 관하여", Law & Technology, 2(3), pp.119~ (2006), 서울대학교 기술과법센터
  6. 이대희, "디지털환경에서의 접근권의 인정에 관한 연구", 106~
  7. 각국의 소프트웨어 불법복제 방지대책에 관한 연구, "안효질", 프로그램심의조정위원회, 70~77 (2002)
  8. 오병철, "기술적 보호조치의 무력화에 따른 불법행위책임", 인터넷법률, (27), pp.3~ (2005)
  9. 문주영, "디지털저작권관리(DRM)의 현황", pp.58~ (2001), 정보통신정책, 정보통신정책연구원
  10. 이성우, "기술적 보호조치에 있어서 접근통제조치의 문제점에 관한 소고", 233~
  11. 디지털콘텐츠의 기술적 보호조치 보호방안에 관한 연구, "한국소프트웨어진흥원", 5~ (2001)
  12. 최성준, "기술적 보호조치 무력화 행위에 관하여", 122~
  13. 오병철, "기술적 보호조치의 무력화에 따른 불법행위책임", 인터넷법률, (27), pp.4~ (2005)
  14. 컴퓨터프로그램보호법개정해설(Ⅰ); 프로그램 기술적 보호조치 법제화, "신각철", 프로그램 심의조정위원회, ~
  15. 방석호, "디지털 딜레마와 현행 지적 재산권 법제의 선택", 디지털컨텐츠보호에 관한 법제 동향과 과제, 한국법제연구원주최 워크샆 자료, pp.21~22 (2000)
  16. 임원선, "DRM의 저작권법적 보호", Law & Technology, pp.33~35 (2005)
  17. 저작물에 대한 사용권 및 접근권의 문제에 관한 연구, "문화관광부", 45~47 (2003)
  18. 오병철, "기술적 보호조치의 무력화에 따른 불법행위책임", 3~4 (2005)
  19. 오길영, "기술적 보호조치와 공정이용에 관한 소고 - DMCA에 대한 검토를 중심으로", 민주법학, (32), pp.219~246 (2006), 민주주의법학연구회
  20. 구대환, "디지털콘텐츠 기술적보호조치와 우회금지규정의 문제점", 저작권법 누구를 위한 법인가, 서울대 기술과 법 센터 창립 3주년 기념 워크숍, pp.139~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)