미성년자 등 간음죄에 있어서 ‘위력’의 의미
Meaning of 'the threat of force' for the crime of Sexual Intercourse against Minor, etc.
0
조회
0
다운로드
21
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Although sexual intercourse by the threat of force against minor(adolescents) or the disabled is provided as a critical crime in the korean criminal law, there are few discussions in earnest about the meaning of 'the threat of force' for this kinds of crime-factor. Meanwhile, korean supreme court presents own guidelines about the meaning and standard of judgment for the threat of force and made a specific cases. But this way, textbook problem by metaphysical abstraction about the meaning of the threat of force is remained as before or critical opinion likes that, it’s a excessive-purposive construction by victim’s subjective intention and situation beyond textual meaning of the threat of force, can be raised. To the correction of this problem for construction the meaning, next three points about the original meaning of ‘the threat of force’ must be considered in the way of case-solution. First point is that, use of the status in objective situation made by the certain status. Second, critical invasion to the victim’s right of self-decision for sexual activity by the threat of force must be confirmed. Lastly, causal relationship between the act of threat and the critical invasion to the victim’s right of self-decision must be certified clearly. If there is enough-wide popular consensus about necessity for the minor’s and the disabled person’s right of self-decision for sexual activity, and if this consensus can support soundness of the attitude of supreme court, it means that, now we have to discuss about the legislative activity for the crime of sexual intercourse with ‘non-consent’.
Abstract
Although sexual intercourse by the threat of force against minor(adolescents) or the disabled is provided as a critical crime in the korean criminal law, there are few discussions in earnest about the meaning of 'the threat of force' for this kinds of crime-factor. Meanwhile, korean supreme court presents own guidelines about the meaning and standard of judgment for the threat of force and made a specific cases. But this way, textbook problem by metaphysical abstraction about the meaning of the threat of force is remained as before or critical opinion likes that, it’s a excessive-purposive construction by victim’s subjective intention and situation beyond textual meaning of the threat of force, can be raised. To the correction of this problem for construction the meaning, next three points about the original meaning of ‘the threat of force’ must be considered in the way of case-solution. First point is that, use of the status in objective situation made by the certain status. Second, critical invasion to the victim’s right of self-decision for sexual activity by the threat of force must be confirmed. Lastly, causal relationship between the act of threat and the critical invasion to the victim’s right of self-decision must be certified clearly. If there is enough-wide popular consensus about necessity for the minor’s and the disabled person’s right of self-decision for sexual activity, and if this consensus can support soundness of the attitude of supreme court, it means that, now we have to discuss about the legislative activity for the crime of sexual intercourse with ‘non-consent’.
참고문헌 (13)
- 김태명, "채권추심을 목적으로 한 전화공세가 형법상 업무방해죄에 해당하는지의 여부", 형사법연구, 21(4), pp.489~516 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- 류병관, "미국 강간죄에 있어 ‘저항’과 ‘동의’에 관한 연구", 비교형사법연구, 9(2), pp.429~454 (2007), 한국비교형사법학회
- 오영근, "일본개정형법가안이 제정형법에 미친 영향과 현행 형법해석론의 문제점", 형사법연구, (20), pp.109~140 (2003), 한국형사법학회
- 오영근, "일본 개정형법가안에 관한 일고찰", 형사정책연구, 10(1) (1999)
- 우희숙, "위력업무방해죄의 ‘위력’ 개념에 대한 해석론- 대법원 2011.3.17. 선고 2007도482 전원합의체 판결을 중심으로 -", 성균관법학, 24(3), pp.451~473 (2012), 법학연구소
- 이승현, "아동 · 청소년 성범죄관련 처벌규정의 문제점과 개선방안", 형사정책, 21(2), pp.33~61 (2009), 한국형사정책학회
- 하태훈, "준강간죄(형법 제299조)와 성폭법 제8조의 ‘항거불능’의 의미", 고려법학, (49), pp.239~260 (2007), 법학연구원
- 한상훈, "최근 독일의 성폭력범죄에 대한 입법과 성적 자기결정의 보호성, In 인도주의적 형사법과형사정책, 우범 이수성 선생 화갑기념논문집" (2000), 동성사
- 한국형사정책연구원, "형사법령제정자료집(1) - 형법" (1990)
- 법무부 조사국, "중국형법전, 만주형법전, 소련형법전 및 일본개정형법가안", 법무자료, 5 (1948)
- 법무부 조사국, "독일형법전, 독일형법초안 및 부라질형법전", 법무자료, 6 (1948)
- R. Singer, "Criminal Law" (2010), Aspen
- Fischer, "StGB" (2008)
