본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등수학 도형영역에 제시된 정의에 관한 교사의 인식과 오류

Teachers' conceptual errors related to the definitions in the area of geometry of elementary school mathematics

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Unlike ordinary situations, definitions play a very important role in mathematics education in schools. Mathematical concepts have been mainly acquired by given definitions. However, according to didactical intentions, mathematics education in schools has employed mathematical concepts and definitions with less strict forms than those in pure mathematics. This research mainly discusses definitions used in geometry (promising) course in primary schools to cope with possibilities of creating misconception due to this didactical transformation. After analyzing problems with potential misconceptions, a survey was conducted with 80 primary school teachers in Jeju to investigate their recognitions in meaning of mathematical concepts in geometry and attitudes toward teaching. Most of the respondents answered they taught their students while they knew well about mathematical definitions in geometry but the respondents sometimes confused mathematical concepts of polygons and circles. Also, they were aware of problems in current mathematics textbooks which have explained figures in small topics (classes). Here, several suggestions are proposed as follows from analyzing teachers' recognitions and researches in mathematical viewpoints of definitions (promising) in geometric figures which have been adopted by current mathematics textbooks in primary schools from the seventh educational curriculum. First, when primary school students in their detailed operational stage studying figures, they tend to experience a collision between concept images acquired from activities to find out promising and concept images formed through promising. Therefore, a teaching method is required to lessen possibility of misconceptions. That is, there should be a communication method between defining conceptual definitions and images. Second, we need to consider how geometric figures and their elements in primary school textbooks are connected with fundamental terminologies laying the foundation for geometrical definitions and more logical approaches should be adopted. Third, the consistency with studying geometric figures should be considered. Fourth, sorting activities about problems in coined words related to figures and way and time of their introductions should be emphasized. In primary schools mathematics curriculum, geometry has played a crucial role in increasing mathematical ways of thoughts. Hence, being introduced by parts from viewpoints of relational understanding should be emphasized more in textbooks and teachers should teach students after restructuring this. Mathematics teachers should help their students not only learn conceptual definitions of geometric figures in their courses well but also advance to rigid mathematical definitions. Therefore, that's why mathematics teachers should know meanings of concepts clearly and accurately.

Abstract

Unlike ordinary situations, definitions play a very important role in mathematics education in schools. Mathematical concepts have been mainly acquired by given definitions. However, according to didactical intentions, mathematics education in schools has employed mathematical concepts and definitions with less strict forms than those in pure mathematics. This research mainly discusses definitions used in geometry (promising) course in primary schools to cope with possibilities of creating misconception due to this didactical transformation. After analyzing problems with potential misconceptions, a survey was conducted with 80 primary school teachers in Jeju to investigate their recognitions in meaning of mathematical concepts in geometry and attitudes toward teaching. Most of the respondents answered they taught their students while they knew well about mathematical definitions in geometry but the respondents sometimes confused mathematical concepts of polygons and circles. Also, they were aware of problems in current mathematics textbooks which have explained figures in small topics (classes). Here, several suggestions are proposed as follows from analyzing teachers' recognitions and researches in mathematical viewpoints of definitions (promising) in geometric figures which have been adopted by current mathematics textbooks in primary schools from the seventh educational curriculum. First, when primary school students in their detailed operational stage studying figures, they tend to experience a collision between concept images acquired from activities to find out promising and concept images formed through promising. Therefore, a teaching method is required to lessen possibility of misconceptions. That is, there should be a communication method between defining conceptual definitions and images. Second, we need to consider how geometric figures and their elements in primary school textbooks are connected with fundamental terminologies laying the foundation for geometrical definitions and more logical approaches should be adopted. Third, the consistency with studying geometric figures should be considered. Fourth, sorting activities about problems in coined words related to figures and way and time of their introductions should be emphasized. In primary schools mathematics curriculum, geometry has played a crucial role in increasing mathematical ways of thoughts. Hence, being introduced by parts from viewpoints of relational understanding should be emphasized more in textbooks and teachers should teach students after restructuring this. Mathematics teachers should help their students not only learn conceptual definitions of geometric figures in their courses well but also advance to rigid mathematical definitions. Therefore, that's why mathematics teachers should know meanings of concepts clearly and accurately.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 강완, "수학적 지식의 교수학적 변환", 한국수학교육학회 시리지 A <수학교육>, 30(1), pp.71~89 (1991)
  2. 강흥규, "학교기하의 다양한 정의 방법과 그 교수학적 의의", 수학교육학연구, 12(1), pp.7~108 (2002), 대한수학교육학회
  3. 교육부, "수학 <1-가> 단계 ~ <6-나> 단계 교과서" (2004), (주)대한교과서
  4. 박교식, "다각형, 다면체, 면에 대한 교수학적 분석", 수학교육학연구, 14(1), pp.19~37 (2004), 대한수학교육학회
  5. 우정호, "학교수학 교과서에서 사용하는 정의에 관한 연구", 수학교육학연구, 11(2), pp.363~384 (2001), 대한수학교육학회
  6. 장혜원, "수학학습에서 표현 및 표상에 관한 연구: 표상모델 개발을 중심으로", 박사, pp.1997
  7. 조영미, "학교수학에 제시된 정의에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2001
  8. 조영미, "수학 교과서에서 사용하는 정의의 특성분석과 수준탐구", 학교수학, 4(1), pp.15~27 (2002)
  9. 최병훈, "한국과 싱가포르의 초등 수학 교과서 비교 분석-도형과 측정 영역을 중심으로-", 학교수학, 8(1), pp.45~68 (2006), 대한수학교육학회
  10. Beth, E., "Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology" (1966), D. Reidel
  11. Freudenthal, H., "Mathematics as an educational task" (1973), Reidel
  12. Maletsky, Evan M., "Harcourt Math (Math-Grade 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)" (2002), Harcourt, Inc.
  13. Piaget, J., "Recherches sur l'abstraction réfléchissante" (1977), Presses Universitaires de France
  14. Rich, B., "Schaum's outlines Geometry" (2000), McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  15. Tall, D., "Building and Testing a Cognitive Approach to the Calculus using Computer Graphics", 박사, pp.1986
  16. Tall, D., "고등수학적사고" (1991), 경문사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)