Analysis of Collaborative Utterances among Elementary Students in Problem-Solving Process
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This is a case study that defined collaborative utterances and analyzed how they appear in the problem-solving process when 5th-grade students solved problems in groups. As a result, collaborative utterances consist of an interchange type and a deliver type and the interchange type is comprised of two process: the verification process and the modification process. Also, in groups where interchange type collaborative utterances were generated actively and students could reach an agreement easily, students applied the teacher’s help to their problem-solving process right after it was provided and could solve problems even though they had some mathematics errors. In interchange-type collaborative utterances, each student’s participation varies with their individual achievement. In deliver-type collaborative utterances, students who solved problems by themselves participated dominantly. The conclusions of this paper are as follows. First, interchange-type collaborative utterances fostered students’ active participation and accelerated students’ arguments. Second, interchange-type collaborative utterances positively influenced the problem-solving process and it is necessary to provide problems that consider students’ achievement in each group. Third, groups should be comprised of students whose individual achievements are similar because students’ participation in collaborative utterances varies with their achievement.
Abstract
This is a case study that defined collaborative utterances and analyzed how they appear in the problem-solving process when 5th-grade students solved problems in groups. As a result, collaborative utterances consist of an interchange type and a deliver type and the interchange type is comprised of two process: the verification process and the modification process. Also, in groups where interchange type collaborative utterances were generated actively and students could reach an agreement easily, students applied the teacher’s help to their problem-solving process right after it was provided and could solve problems even though they had some mathematics errors. In interchange-type collaborative utterances, each student’s participation varies with their individual achievement. In deliver-type collaborative utterances, students who solved problems by themselves participated dominantly. The conclusions of this paper are as follows. First, interchange-type collaborative utterances fostered students’ active participation and accelerated students’ arguments. Second, interchange-type collaborative utterances positively influenced the problem-solving process and it is necessary to provide problems that consider students’ achievement in each group. Third, groups should be comprised of students whose individual achievements are similar because students’ participation in collaborative utterances varies with their achievement.
참고문헌 (37)
- Baer, J., "Grouping and achievement in cooperative learning", College Teaching, 51(4), pp.169~174 (2003)
- Barron, B., "Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), pp.403~436 (2000)
- Barron, B., "When smart groups fail", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), pp.307~359 (2003)
- Chiu, M. M., "Group problem‐solving processes : Social interactions and individual actions", Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(1), pp.26~49 (2000)
- Chiu, M. M., "Flowing toward correct contributions during group problem solving : A statistical discourse analysis", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(3), pp.415~463 (2008)
- Dillenbourg, P., "Learning in humans and Machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science", pp.189~211 (1996), Elsevier
- Erkens, G., "Dialogic learning", pp.191~216 (2004), Springer
- "The effect of peer collaboration on children's probl em‐solving ability" (2002)[URL]
- Forman, E. A., "Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives", pp.323~347 (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Hersberger, J., "On my mind : cooperative groups can and often should be homogeneous", Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 1(6), pp.436~438 (1995)
- Johnson, D. W., "Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic conditions on children’s problem-solving performance", American Educational Research Journal, 17(1), pp.83~93 (1980)
- 김수진, "발화 요소와 발화 유형", 한국어 의미학, 36, pp.91~118 (2011), 한국어의미학회
- 공희정, "초등학교 수학과 소집단 협동학습에 나타나는 의사소통의 수단 분석", 한국초등수학교육학회지, 9(2), pp.181~200 (2005), 한국초등수학교육학회
- Kumpulainen, K., "The interpersonal dynamics of collaborative reasoning in peer interactive dyads", The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(4), pp.333~370 (2003)
- Langer-Osuna, J. M., "The social construction of authority among peers and its implications for collaborative mathematics problem solving", Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(2), pp.107~124 (2016)
- 이명희, "소집단 협력 학습이 아동의 수학 학습에 미치는 영향 분석", 수학교육, 43(1), pp.51~74 (2004), 한국수학교육학회
- Maienschein, J., "Why collaborate?", Journal of the History of Biology, 26(2), pp.167~183 (1993)
- Ministry of Education., "Mathematics curriculum.. Ministry of Education Notice, No. 2015-74", ~ (2015)
- Mugny, G., "Socio-cognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances", European Journal of Social Psychology, 8(2), pp.181~192 (1978)
- Norris-Tirrell, D., "Introduction : Assessing multiple dimensions of collaboration", Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 35(1), pp.4~10 (2012)
- "PISA 2015 draft collaborative problem solving framework" (2013)[URL]
- "Collaborative versus cooperative learning: A comparison of the two concepts which will help us understand the underlying nature of interactive learning" (1999)[URL]
- "P21framework definition" (2009)[URL]
- Piaget, J., "Language and thought of the child:Selected works (Vol 5)" (2005), Routledge
- Roschelle, J., "Computer supported collaborative learning. NATO ASI Series (Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences) vol 128", pp.69~97 (1995), Springer
- Schwarz, B. B., "Two wrongs may make a right. If they argue together!", Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), pp.461~494 (2000)
- Slavin, R. E., "Cooperative learning", Review of Educational Research, 50(2), pp.315~342 (1980)
- Slavin, R. E., "Cooperative learning and group contingencies", Journal of Behavioral Education, 1(1), pp.105~115 (1991)
- Stevens, R. J., "The cooperative elementary school : Effects on students'achievement, attitudes, and social relations", American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), pp.321~351 (1995)
- Summers, M., "Group work does not necessarily equal collaborative learning : evidence from observations and self-reports", European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25(4), pp.473~492 (2010)
- Van Boxtel, C., "Dialogic learning", pp.125~143 (2004), Springer
- Verba, M., "Expert-novice interactions : Influence of partner status", European Journal of Psychology of Education, 7(1), pp.61~ (1992)
- Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind in society: The development of higher mental process" (2009), Hagisiseup
- Webb, N. M., "Student interaction and learning in small groups", Review of Educational Research, 52(3), pp.421~445 (1982)
- Webb, N. M., "Equity issues in collaborative group assessment : Group composition and performance", American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), pp.607~651 (1998)
- Webb, N. M., "Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), pp.366~389 (1991)
- Wood, D. J., "Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration", The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), pp.139~162 (1991)