본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등학생의 분수와 분수 연산에 대한 이해 양상

Examining how elementary students understand fractions and operations1

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study examines how elementary students understand fractions with operations conceptually and how they perform procedures in the division of fractions. We attempted to look into students’ understanding about fractions with divisions in regard to mathematical proficiency suggested by National Research Council (2001). Mathematical proficiency is identified as an intertwined and interconnected composition of 5 strands- conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, strategic competence, adaptive reasoning, and productive disposition. We developed an instrument to identify students’ understanding of fractions with multiplication and division and conducted the survey in which 149 6th-graders participated. The findings from the data analysis suggested that overall, the 6th-graders seemed not to understand fractions conceptually; in particular, their understanding is limited to a particular model of part-whole fraction. The students showed a tendency to use memorized procedure-invert and multiply in a given problem without connecting the procedure to the concept of the division of fractions. The findings also proposed that on a given problem-solving task that suggested a pathway in order for the students to apply or follow the procedures in a new situation, they performed the computation very fluently when dividing two fractions by multiplying by a reciprocal. In doing so, however, they appeared to unable to connect the procedures with the concepts of fractions with division.

Abstract

This study examines how elementary students understand fractions with operations conceptually and how they perform procedures in the division of fractions. We attempted to look into students’ understanding about fractions with divisions in regard to mathematical proficiency suggested by National Research Council (2001). Mathematical proficiency is identified as an intertwined and interconnected composition of 5 strands- conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, strategic competence, adaptive reasoning, and productive disposition. We developed an instrument to identify students’ understanding of fractions with multiplication and division and conducted the survey in which 149 6th-graders participated. The findings from the data analysis suggested that overall, the 6th-graders seemed not to understand fractions conceptually; in particular, their understanding is limited to a particular model of part-whole fraction. The students showed a tendency to use memorized procedure-invert and multiply in a given problem without connecting the procedure to the concept of the division of fractions. The findings also proposed that on a given problem-solving task that suggested a pathway in order for the students to apply or follow the procedures in a new situation, they performed the computation very fluently when dividing two fractions by multiplying by a reciprocal. In doing so, however, they appeared to unable to connect the procedures with the concepts of fractions with division.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 권지현, "중학교 수학 교과서에 제시된 기하영역의 수학 과제 분석", 수학교육, 52(1), pp.111~128 (2013), 한국수학교육학회
  2. 김경미, "분수의 곱셈과 나눗셈에 대한 학생의 이해와 문장제 해결의 관련성 분석", 수학교육, 50(3), pp.339~356 (2011), 한국수학교육학회
  3. 김구연, "The Analysis of Mathematics Curriculum Materials: Addition and Subtraction in Grade 3", 교육과정평가연구, 13(2), pp.59~78 (2010), 한국교육과정평가원
  4. 김구연, "중학교 수학교과서가 학생에게 제공하는 함수 학습기회 탐색", 학교수학, 19(2), pp.289~317 (2017), 대한수학교육학회
  5. 김구연, "수업지도안 분석을 통한 수학교사의 수업설계역량(Pedagogical Design Capacity) 탐색", 수학교육, 56(4), pp.365~385 (2017), 한국수학교육학회[DOI]
  6. 김미희, "고등학교 교과서의 수학과제 분석", 학교수학, 15(1), pp.37~59 (2013), 대한수학교육학회
  7. 김민경, "초등학생의 분수 이해 분석 - 6학년의 분수 개념 및 분수 나눗셈을 중심으로 -", 한국학교수학회논문집, 12(2), pp.151~170 (2009), 한국학교수학회
  8. 김민혁, "수학교사의 교과서 및 교사용 지도서 활용도 조사", 학교수학, 15(3), pp.503~531 (2013), 대한수학교육학회
  9. 방정숙, "분수의 곱셈과 나눗셈에 관한 초등학교 수학과 교과용 도서 분석", 학교수학, 11(4), pp.723~743 (2009), 대한수학교육학회
  10. 이일웅, "Worked-out Example을 통한 중학생들의 수에 대한 학습", 한국학교수학회논문집, 17(2), pp.291~319 (2014), 한국학교수학회
  11. 홍창준, "중학교 함수 단원의 수학과제 분석", 학교수학, 14(2), pp.213~232 (2012), 대한수학교육학회[DOI]
  12. Ball, D. L., "Content knowledge of teaching: what makes it special?", Journal for Teacher Education, 59(5), pp.389~407 (2008)
  13. Campbell, P. F., "The relationship between teachers’mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge, teachers’ perceptions, and student achievement", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), pp.419~459 (2014)
  14. Collopy, R., "Curriculum materials as a professional development tool : How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning", Elementary School Journal, 103, pp.287~311 (2003)
  15. Grouws, G. A., "Curriculum and implementation effects on high school students’mathematics learning from curricula representation subject-specific and integrated content organizations", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44, pp.416~463 (2013)
  16. Henningsen, M., "Mathematics tasks and student cognition : Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, pp.524~549 (1997)
  17. Hill, H. C., "Teacher knowledge, curriculum materials, and quality of instruction : Lessons learned and open issues", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44, pp.559~576 (2012)
  18. Hill, H. C., "Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement", American Educational Research Journal, 42(20), pp.371~406 (2005)
  19. Lamon, S. J., "Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers" (2012), Routledge
  20. Lobato, J., "Essential understandings: Ratios, proportions, and proportional reasoning" (2010), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
  21. Ma, L., "Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States" (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum
  22. Mayer, R. E., "Learning and instruction" (2008), Pearson
  23. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Principles and standards for school mathematics" (2000), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
  24. National Research Council, "Adding it up:Helping children learn mathematics" (2001), National Academy Press
  25. NIllas, L., "Division of fractions : Preservice teachers’ understanding and use of problem solving strategies", The Mathematics Educator, 7(2), pp.96~113 (2003)
  26. Sinicrope, R., "Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions, NCTM 2002 yearbook", pp.153~161 (2002), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
  27. Stein, M. K., "Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction", pp.37~55 (2009), Routledge
  28. Stein, M. K., "Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection", Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3, pp.268~275 (1998)
  29. Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., "Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design" (2007), Lawrence Erlbaum
  30. Wilhelm, A. G., "Mathematics teachers’ enactment of cognitively demanding tasks : Investigating links to teachers’ knowledge and conceptions", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(5), pp.636~674 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)