河濱 愼後聃의 『주역』해석-『周易象辭新編』의 효변을 중심으로-

Abstract

This article is a study on the way of Habin Sin Hu-Dam(1702-1761)’s interpretation of Zhouyi, centering on 『Zhouyisangsasinpyeon』. The characteristics of Sin Hu-Dam’s method of interpreting Zhouyi is that he explained the organic relationship of hyo(爻) based on the sang(象) by applying Hyopyeon(爻變). A certain form expressing yaobain is ‘SiwiAJiBYa(是爲A之B也)’. For example, it is a cross stroke where geongwae becomes daeyugwae after change. Because ‘SiwiGeonjiDaeyuya(是爲乾之大有也)’ means that ‘Geongwae(乾卦䷀) Nine in the fifth place’ is changed and becomes Daeyugwae(大有卦䷍), we have to interpret ‘Geongwae Nine in the fifth place’ by referring to Geongwae as the original gwae and Daeyugwae as the resulting gwae. He applied such methods by using a formula in each of the 384 Hyo(爻) and explained Hyosa(爻辭). And he creatively used Hoche(互體), Bi(比) and Eung(應) in Gwaehyosa(卦爻辭). The writer estimated that the origin of Sin Hu-Dam’s interpretation of Zhouyi that was revealed in the 『Zhouyisangsasinpyeon(周易象辭新編)』was the Shìfǎ (筮法) of 『Chunchujwassijeon(春秋左氏傳)』. In interpreting Zhouyi, instead of relying on the existing tendency of interpretation of Zhouyi of ChéngYí(程頤) and ZhūXī(朱熹) , Sin Hu-Dam consolidated and combined them. To discuss the universal nature of the 『Zhouyi』, he accepted the 『Jeongjeon(程傳)』 and to discuss the principle that penetrates the 『Zhouyi』, he accepted the 『Bonui(本義)』. And at the same time, he interpreted Gwaehyosa(卦爻辭) by applying systematic methods. Therefore, it can be said that the interpretation system of Chéng Yí and Zhū Xī has been advanced to the original interpretation system. Sin Hu-Dam’s 『Zhouyisangsasinpyeon(周易象辭新編)』 can be evaluated as a writing, which proves that there was a solid interpretation of 『Zhouyi』 Sangsuhak(象數學) with the existence of already settled yaobain before Cheong Yagyong(丁若鏞)'s 『ZhouYisajeon (周易四箋)』 in our history of Zhouyi study.