『주역』「잡괘전」의 착간 논쟁 연구 − 내지덕(來知德)과 이광지(李光地)를 중심으로 −

Abstract

‘Is there a Cuojian in Zagua?’ The dispute over this topic is one of the main issues of I-Ching studies. There has been a sharp confrontation between the ‘Revisionist’ faction that argues people should recognize Cuojian and should understand Zagua through the revised script, and the ‘Preservationist’ faction that insists people should understand Zagua as the original script. In this debate, the former (the Revisionists) had to secure justification for revising the script, and the latter (the Preservationists) had to present a working theory that could explain the Zagua more consistently. In the process, both factions (or parties) showed a different understanding of Zagua’s authoring intent. Lai Zhide, a representative of the Revisionist faction, sought to secure the legitimacy of the Cuojian revision through the theory of Cuo Zong, which is the King Mun’s creation principle of I-Ching, is consistently presented in the scripture. Therefore he asserted that Zagua is to exhibit Cuo Zong theory. Li Guangdi, a representative of the Preservationist faction, tried to solve the difficulties of preserving the meaning of the script by explaining the Zagua with the theory of Hu Ti. Therefore he contended that the intention of Zagua is the theory of Hu Ti. Thus, the issue of contention did not stop at ‘whether Cuojian exists’; rather it extended to ‘authoring intent’ of the Zagua.