싱가포르의 국제상사분쟁해결 허브전략으로서의 국제중재센터(SIAC)외 국제상사법원(SICC)
SIAC plus SICC as International Commercial Dispute Resolution Hub Strategy of Singapore
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
싱가포르정부는1991년에국제중재센터를설립하고1994년에국제중재법을제정하는등중재제도발전을위한노력을기울여왔다.그결과현재SIAC는유수한중재기관으로성장하였다.이에더하여싱가포르정부는2015. 1. 5.싱가포르국제상사법원을개원하였다. SICC는섭외적요소를지닌국제무역거래에서야기되는사적분쟁을해결하는고등법원내의부로서종래의법원과는명확히다르게설계되었다.이와같이성공적인ADR기관인SIAC에더하여혁신적이고개방적인재판부를신설한것은국제상사분쟁해결의허브를지향하는국가전략에따른것이다. SIAC와SICC의병존은분쟁당사자들에게해결의경로에대한선택지를주는것으로서싱가포르는자국내에서보다많은사건을다룰기회를가질것이다. 국제상사분쟁해결의허브국가를지향하는한국도차별화된전략이있어야한다.
Abstract
The Singapore government hasmade efforts to improve the environment for the development of the arbitration system by establishing the International Arbitration Center in 1991 and enacting the International Arbitration Act in 1994. Tanks government's support, SIAChas grown into a leading arbitration institution. In January 2015, the Singapore government officially openedSICC to grow the legal services sector and expand the scope for the internationalization and export of Singapore law. The SICCis a division of court in Singapore high court that resolves international commercial disputes with an foreign element, and is drawing attention as a distinct institution from conventional courts. The reason for establishing an innovative and open judicial systemin addition to the SIAC, a generic dispute resolution institution, is in accordancewith the national strategy ofmaking Singapore to be the hub of international commercial dispute resolution and grow its legal services industry. Operating two path, SIAC and SICC, in parallel are an option for parties, and Singaporewill have the opportunity to dealwithmore caseswithin its territory. This paper provides first hand information regarding the dispute resolution mechanism of international commercial disputes in Singapore. If Koreawants to become a leading foruminNortheast Asia for legal services and international commercial dispute resolution, it should have a outstanding differentiated policy.
참고문헌 (26)
- 김선정, "홍콩 중재령에 있어서의 UNCITRAL모범법의 수용", 중재연구, 7(1) (1997)
- 김선정, "필리핀의 2004년 대체적 분쟁해결법 소고* - UNCITRAL 모범법의 수용과 관련하여 -", 중재연구, 19(2), pp.197~227 (2009), 한국중재학회
- 김선정, "2011년 베트남 상사중재법에 관한 소고", 중재연구, 23(4), pp.97~122 (2013), 한국중재학회
- 김선정, "몽골의 국제상사분쟁해결법원으로서의 중재법", 무역보험연구, 15(3), pp.185~215 (2014), 한국무역보험학회
- 목영준, "상사중재법" (2011), 박영사
- 백윤재, "국제중재 허브와 중재인 양성", 중재인회보, (13) (2011)
- 한종규, "국제중재산업의 국가 지원에 관한 연구 - 홍콩과 중국의 사례를 비교하여 -", 선진상사법률연구, (75), pp.99~131 (2016), 법무부
- 裘索, "CIETAC分裂に伴う仲裁管轄權についての爭いの終焉", 國際商事法務, 43(10) (2015)
- "國際商事法務", 2015, ~
- "國際商事法務", 2015, ~
- 武藤佳昭, "上海市及び深玔市中級人民法院における新たな司法判斷を踏まえた, CIETAC 分裂問題に對する實務上の對應について", 國際商事法務, 43(6) (2015)
- 石川明, "ADRの實際と理論Ⅰ" (2003), 中央大學出版部
- 住田尙之, "中國國際經濟貿易仲裁委員會規則(CIETAC規則)の最新改正及び分裂問題のその後の狀況", 國際商事法務, 43(6) (2015)
- Ali, S. F., "Arbitration in Asia in Comparative Perspective Examining the Role of the Arbitrator in Facilitating Settlement" (2013), International Commercial Arbitration in Asia, JURIS
- Cuniberti, Gilles, "The Laws of Asian International Business Transactions", Wash. Int'l L.J, 25 (2016)
- Greenberg, S., "International Commercial Arbitration : An Asia-Pacific Perspective" (2011), Cambridge University Press
- Kun, Fan, "Salient Features of International Commercial Arbitration in East Asia: A Comparative Study of China and Japan", Am. U. Bus. L. Rev, 5 (2016)
- Reyes, Anselmo, "Recognition and Enforcement of Interlocutory and Final Judgements of the Singapore International Commercial Court", JICL, 2 (2015)
- Yang, L. S., "Arbitration in Singapore" (2013), International Commercial Arbitration in Asia, JURIS
- International Commercial Arbitration in South Asia-A Comparative Study, "Youn Jin, C.", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2012)
- "The Straits Times", ~ (2015)
- Report of The Singapore International Commercial Court, "Indranee Rajah SC", ~ (2013)
- "Commentary : The Singapore International Commercial Court in Action Illustration from the First Case" (2016)[URL]