한국어와 태국어의 사동표현 대조분석

Abstract

It is the purpose of this study to describe, analyze, and compare causative expression and make sure it’s common feature and difference that appear causative expressions of Korean and Thai language. To summarize the results of this research are as following; Lexical Causativeness come true as simple vocabulary in the meaning, so both Korean and Thai language have low productivity. These is not deal with category of causative mood but come true causative expressions by some incomplete intransitive verb in the of causative meaning. These verb that come true formal causativeness usually has a character of middle verb in Thai language. Morphological causativeness shows with causative affix ' -이(i)-,-히(hi)-,-리(lee)-,-기(gi)-,-우(woo)-,-구(goo)-,-추(chu)-' in Korean language In Thai language however, causative affix unite minimal word in some loan words. Syntactic causativeness has come true as in syntax "만들다(mandulda)/하다hada)" in Korean language and /tham/, /haj/, /thamhaj/ in Thai language. But they need several limitations in these syntactic causativeness. Besides, there is not formal directness and indirectness in causativeness in Korean language but in case of Thai language syntax /tham/ means direct causativeness /haj/ structure means indirect causativeness. And syntax /thamhaj/ means not only direct causativeness but also indirect causativeness. There are some Syntactic Restrictions in Korean and Thai Causative. We can describe characters of individual language as well as universality of natural language through these studies. Making a progress, it can be useful to make sure that not only Korean Thai-language learner as a foreign language but also Thai- Korean language learner as a foreign language understand complicated causative expressions more easily which based on this study on structure of their mother tongue.