본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Conflicting Views of the Opposing Sides: Movement Frames and Counter Frames in Gunpo Anti-Incinerator Movement

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study attempts to investigate the dynamic relationship between opposing sides through movement frames and counter-movement frames. The Gunpo anti-incinerator case was the iconic social movement in Korea that had attracted controversy between activists and the larger culture. The current case study analyzes the Gunpo case to find how the two opposing sides justify their reasoning and which strategies each side adopted. This study defines actions taken by social movement groups as movement frames and actions enacted by government as counter movement frames. Various sources of data were utilized such as newspaper articles, interviews, and governmental documents in order to support their argument. The current study found different tactics used to respond to opposing side from the Gunpo case. For example, the social movement groups attempted to respond to the counter group in ways intended to ward off, contain, limit, or reverse them. In responding to the claims, the government responded to the movement frames of the movement group in ways intended for blaming, shirking, refuting, diverting, and appeasing. The study suggests that future research studies need to analyze cases as a dynamic interaction not only including the interaction between the opposing sides, but also including any people or group who pays attention to the dynamic interaction such as the general public or other grassroots organizations.

Abstract

This study attempts to investigate the dynamic relationship between opposing sides through movement frames and counter-movement frames. The Gunpo anti-incinerator case was the iconic social movement in Korea that had attracted controversy between activists and the larger culture. The current case study analyzes the Gunpo case to find how the two opposing sides justify their reasoning and which strategies each side adopted. This study defines actions taken by social movement groups as movement frames and actions enacted by government as counter movement frames. Various sources of data were utilized such as newspaper articles, interviews, and governmental documents in order to support their argument. The current study found different tactics used to respond to opposing side from the Gunpo case. For example, the social movement groups attempted to respond to the counter group in ways intended to ward off, contain, limit, or reverse them. In responding to the claims, the government responded to the movement frames of the movement group in ways intended for blaming, shirking, refuting, diverting, and appeasing. The study suggests that future research studies need to analyze cases as a dynamic interaction not only including the interaction between the opposing sides, but also including any people or group who pays attention to the dynamic interaction such as the general public or other grassroots organizations.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Benford. R. D., "Framing Activity, Meaning, and Social Movement Participation: The Nuclear Disarmament Movement", 박사, pp.1987
  2. Benford R. D., "Frame Disputes within the Nuclear Disarmament Movement", Social Forces, 71, pp.677~701 (1993)
  3. Benford R. D., "Challenges and Choices: Constructionist Perspectives on Social Problems, In Challenges and Choices: Constructionist Perspectives on Social Problems", pp.153~186 (2003), Aldine de Gruyter
  4. Best, J., "Threatened Children: Rhetoric and Concern about Child-Victims" (1990), University of Chicago Press
  5. Collins, R., "Theoretical Sociology" (1988), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
  6. Cho, Gum Suk, "I Believe in Human Power", GCGEA Monthly Newsletter, ~ (2001)
  7. Gamson, "Talking Politics" (1992), Cambridge University Press
  8. Gunpo City Government, "A successful Case for the Incinerator Conflict", City internal Documents, pp.44~79
  9. Hunt S. A., "Collective Identity, Solidarity, and Commitment, In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements", pp.439~ (2004), Blackwell
  10. Ibarra P. R., "Vernacular Constituents of Moral Discourse: An Interactionist Proposal for the Study of Social Problems, In Constructionist Controversies: Issues in Social Problems Theory" (1993), Aldine de Gruyter
  11. "The Gunpo Mayor, Who Is Having Difficulty Finding Solutions", JoongAng Ilbo, ~ (1994)
  12. "Conflict Management Is Necessary", JoongAng Ilbo, ~ (1995)
  13. "There Are Still Flames Left", JoongAng Ilbo, ~ (1995)
  14. "Too Painful in Gunpo", JoongAng Ilbo, ~ (1995)
  15. "We Need to Make a Decision", JoongAng Ilbo, ~ (1996)
  16. "Sanbon Incinerator Site Selected But There Are Still Some Variables Left", JoongAng Ilbo, ~ (1996)
  17. "Gunpo Citizen Coalition Asks to Stop Building Incinerator", JoongAng Ilbo, ~ (1998)
  18. Lee, Dae Soo, "Gunpo Anti-Incinerator Movement", Its Meaning and Further Projects: The Zero Waste Movement for 20 years and the Possibility for Achieving Green Autonomous City, 2003, ~
  19. Snow D. A., "Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization", International Social Movement Research, 1, pp.197~218 (1988)
  20. Snow D. A., "Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization and Movement Participation", American Sociological Review, 51, pp.456~481 (1986)
  21. Song, Jaeyoung, "Incionerator Movement Inspires Hope", GCGEA Monthly Newsletter, ~ (2001)
  22. Spector M., "Constructing Social Problems" (1987), Aldine de Gruyter
  23. "Conflict Expands in Sanbon Incinerator" (1997)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)