광역단체장 선거공약의 정책적 차별성에 관한 연구 - 2006년 부산시장선거의 사례 -
A Study of Distinction in Policy among Election Pledges of Metropolitan Mayor Candidates - a case study on the Busan Metropolitan Mayor Election in 2006 -
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Realizing a policy-based election, where voters vote in accordance with election pledges, it is the most important that each candidate’s programs have clear distinction from others'. Is this distinction of election pledges shown in our local election? To get an answer for this question, the election pledges from each mayoral election camp on the 2006 Local Election have been analyzed by categorizing them into three different categories: visions, prior areas, and policies. In result, there actually were some distinction among the candidates’ pledges since each candidate had different orientations. Hu, Nam-sik, representing conservatives, presented policies on globalization with economical development in the top priority. Besides, Kim, Suk-jun, representing progressives, presented policies placing the people’s livelihood and public welfare at the top. However, Oh, Gu-don, who was relatively leading the campaign than Kim, let voters fail to find any distinction from other two candidates since his pledges turn into a catch-all program pursuing development and welfare at the same time. Though centrist is one of political position that people can take, it is not just taking policies from two opposite positions at the central position. Thus centrists need to present voters clear philosophy and vision, and develop policies of their own.
Abstract
Realizing a policy-based election, where voters vote in accordance with election pledges, it is the most important that each candidate’s programs have clear distinction from others'. Is this distinction of election pledges shown in our local election? To get an answer for this question, the election pledges from each mayoral election camp on the 2006 Local Election have been analyzed by categorizing them into three different categories: visions, prior areas, and policies. In result, there actually were some distinction among the candidates’ pledges since each candidate had different orientations. Hu, Nam-sik, representing conservatives, presented policies on globalization with economical development in the top priority. Besides, Kim, Suk-jun, representing progressives, presented policies placing the people’s livelihood and public welfare at the top. However, Oh, Gu-don, who was relatively leading the campaign than Kim, let voters fail to find any distinction from other two candidates since his pledges turn into a catch-all program pursuing development and welfare at the same time. Though centrist is one of political position that people can take, it is not just taking policies from two opposite positions at the central position. Thus centrists need to present voters clear philosophy and vision, and develop policies of their own.
참고문헌 (36)
- 김병식, "지방자치단체장의 선거공약과 공약이행평가에서 나타난 사회복지정책정향에 관한 연구 -충북지역 기초자치단체장의 선거공약을 중심으로-", 한국지방자치학회보, 14(2), pp.1~217 (2002), 한국지방자치학회
- 김영래, "매니페스토 운동의 의미와 한국선거문화의 변화 전망", 21세기정치학회 특별학술대회 발표논문 (2006)
- 김욱, "매니페스토운동의 평가와 과제: 5.31지방선거를 중심으로.in: 매니페스토와 정책선거" (2008), 논형
- 공직선거의 여성정책공약 평가틀 개발에 관한 연구: 대통령 선거 및 총선을 중심으로, "김원홍", 한국여성정책연구원, ~ (2007)
- 민주노동당 부산시당 정책위원회, "서민행복특별시 부산. in: 김석준 민주노동당 부산시장 후보 정책자료집" (2006)
- 박광국, "지방자치단체장의 선거공약의 정치적 상징성에 관한 연구", 국정책학회보, 9(3), pp.91~108 (2000)
- 박찬욱, "5.31지방선거 매니페스토 평가와 과제", 제52차 의정연구논단 발표논문 (2006)
- 송근원, "선거정치론" (1994), 경성대학교출판부
- 송근원, "2002년 대선 공약 비교 분석을 위한 기준과 척도", 한국정책학회보, 11(4), pp.505~534 (2002), 한국정책학회
- 안철현, "16대대선 주요정당 후보들의 공약에 관한 연구", 사회과학연구, 20(1), pp.79~107 (2004), 경성대학교 사회과학연구소
- 안철현, "한국 지역주의와 17대 총선", 지역사회연구, 13(3), pp.113~134 (2005)
- 안철현, "2006년 지방선거에서의 매니페스토 운동의 의의와 한계", 21세기정치학회보, 16(2), pp.125~148 (2006), 21세기정치학회
- 열린우리당 부산광역시당 희망부산시민위원회, "Good Bye Old Busan! OK! New Busan!. in: 열린우리당 부산광역시장 후보 오거돈 정책자료집" (2006)
- 이현출, "선거공약의 정치과정과 함의 : 광역자치단체장 선거를 중심으로", 지방행정연구, 19(1), pp.133~158 (2005), 한국지방행정연구원
- 이현출, "지방선거와 매니페스토: 평가와 전망", 매니페스토 추진 한일공동 세미나 발표논문 (2006)
- 정진민, "후기 산업사회 정당정치와 한국의 정치발전" (1998), 한울
- 조기숙, "지역주의선거와 합리적 유권자" (2000), 나남출판
- "총선시민연대"[URL]
- 한국정책학회, "대통령과 국가정책" (1994), 대영문화사
- 한국정책학회, "제16대 대통령선거 정책공약 비교분석집" (2002)
- 한국정책학회, "제17대 국회의원선거 정책공약 비교분석집" (2004)
- 한나라당 부산광역시당, "글로벌 부산 2006. in: 허남식 부산광역시장 후보 정책자료집" (2006)
- 허범, "대통령선거정책공약의 설계를 위한 개념의 틀과 지도지침", 한국정책학회보, 6(2), pp.11~41 (1997)
- 황아란, "한국 지방선거의 변화와 지속성: 정당 경쟁을 중심으로", 한국선거학회 특별학술회의 발표논문 (2006)
- Anderson, Charles W., "Recommending a Scheme of Reason: Political Theory, Policy Science, and Democracy", Policy Science, 26(3), pp.215~228 (1993)
- Brady, David, "Building Majorities for Policy Changes in the House of Representatives", Journal of Politics, 46, pp.1033~1060 (1984)
- Cain, Bruce, "The Personal Vote" (1987), Harvard University Press
- Campbell, A., "The American Voter" (1960), Wiley
- Cobb, Roger W., "Participation in American Politics. in: Dynamics of Agenda-Building" (1983), Johns Hopkins University Press
- Davis, Otto, "An Expository Development of a Mathematical of the Electoral Process", American Political Science Review, 64, pp.26~48 (1970)
- Downs, Anthony, "An economic theory of democracy" (1957), Harper & Row
- Kirchheimer, Otto, "The Catch-All Party. in: The West European Party System", pp.50~60 (1990), Oxford Univ. Press
- Page, Benjamin I., "Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections. in: Rational Man and Electoral Democracy" (1978), University of Chicago Press
- Page, Benjamin I., "The Rational Public" (1992), University of Chicago Press
- Peterson, Paul E., "City Limits" (1981), The University of Chicago Press
- Wolinetz, Steven, "Party System Change: The Catch-all Thesis Revisited", West European Politics, 14, pp.113~128 (1991)