본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

손 재활 로봇의 적용이 만성 뇌졸중 환자의 손 기능향상에 미치는 영향

Effect of Robot-Assisted Hand Rehabilitation on Hand Function in Chronic Stroke Patients

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study was to investigate effect of robot-assisted hand rehabilitation(AmadeoⓇ) on hand motor function in chronic stroke patients. This study used a single-subject experimental design with multiple baselines across individuals. Three chronic stroke survivors with mild to sever motor impairment took part in study. Each participants had 2 weeks interval of starting intervention. Participants received robot-assisted therapy(45min/session. 3session/wk for 6wks). Finger active range of motion(AROM) was assessed by Range of Assessment program in AmadeoⓇ, and test-retest reliability was verified using Pearson correlation analysis. To investigate effect of AmadeoⓇ, finger AROM was measured immediately after each sessions and Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper extremity, Motor Activity Log, Nine hole peg board test and Jebsen-Taylor hand motor function test were assessed at pre-post intervention. Results were analyzed by visual analysis and comparison of pre-post tests. The test-retest reliability of Range of Assessment was good(r=.99). After robot-assisted therapy, finger AROM of participant 1, 2, and 3 was respectively improved by 18%, 3.6%, and 6% each. Hand motor function of participant 1, 3 was improved on all four tests, but not effect in participant 2. Robot-assisted hand rehabilitation could improve finger AROM and effect on hand motor function in chronic stroke patients.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate effect of robot-assisted hand rehabilitation(AmadeoⓇ) on hand motor function in chronic stroke patients. This study used a single-subject experimental design with multiple baselines across individuals. Three chronic stroke survivors with mild to sever motor impairment took part in study. Each participants had 2 weeks interval of starting intervention. Participants received robot-assisted therapy(45min/session. 3session/wk for 6wks). Finger active range of motion(AROM) was assessed by Range of Assessment program in AmadeoⓇ, and test-retest reliability was verified using Pearson correlation analysis. To investigate effect of AmadeoⓇ, finger AROM was measured immediately after each sessions and Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper extremity, Motor Activity Log, Nine hole peg board test and Jebsen-Taylor hand motor function test were assessed at pre-post intervention. Results were analyzed by visual analysis and comparison of pre-post tests. The test-retest reliability of Range of Assessment was good(r=.99). After robot-assisted therapy, finger AROM of participant 1, 2, and 3 was respectively improved by 18%, 3.6%, and 6% each. Hand motor function of participant 1, 3 was improved on all four tests, but not effect in participant 2. Robot-assisted hand rehabilitation could improve finger AROM and effect on hand motor function in chronic stroke patients.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. V.M. Parker, "Loss of arm function after stroke : Measurement, frequency, and recovery", International Rehabilitation Medicine, 8(2), pp.69~73 (1986)
  2. T.S. Oslen, "Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation", Stroke, 21(2), pp.247~251 (1990)
  3. B.B. Johansson, "Current trends in stroke rehabilitation. A review with focus on brain plasticity", Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 123(3), pp.147~159 (2011)
  4. C. Butefisch, "Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor re habilitation of centrally paretic hand", Journal of Neurological Science, 130(1), pp.59~68 (2005)
  5. J. Carey, "Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke", Brain, 125(4), pp.773~788 (2002)
  6. E. Taub, "Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74(4), pp.347~354 (1993)
  7. C. Takahashi, "Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke", Brain, 131(2), pp.425~437 (2008)
  8. S.L. Wolf, "Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke : the EXCITE randomized clinical trial", Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(17), pp.2095~2104 (2006)
  9. P.S. Lum, "Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper limp motor function after stroke", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(7), pp.951~959 (2002)
  10. C.G. Bugar, "Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy : The Palo Alto VA", Stanford experience, 2000, pp.37(3), 663~673
  11. B.H. Dobkin, "Strategies for stroke rehabilitation", Lancet Neurology, 3(9), pp.528~536 (2004)
  12. S.E. Fasoli, "Robotic technology and stroke rehabilitation : Translating research into practice", Topic in Stroke Rehabilitation, 11(4), pp.11~19 (2004)
  13. D. Reinkensmeyer, "Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery", Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 6, pp.497~525 (2004)
  14. B.T. Volpe, "Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering from stroke", Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 5(6), pp.465~470 (2005)
  15. G.B. Prange, "Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke", Journal of Rehabilitation Research and development, 43(2), pp.171~184 (2006)
  16. M.L. Aisen, "The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke", Archives of Neurology, 54(4), pp.443~446 (1997)
  17. M. Ferraro, "Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke", Neurology, 61(11), pp.1604~1607 (2003)
  18. L.E. Kahn, "Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm : Does it matter what the robot does?", Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 43(5), pp.619~630 (2006)
  19. H.I. Krebs, "Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: From evidence-based to science- based rehabilitation", Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 8(4), pp.54~70 (2002)
  20. S. Hesse, "Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control", Current Opinion in Neurology, 16(6), pp.705~710 (2003)
  21. C.H. Hwang, "Individual finger synchronized robot-assisted hand rehabilitation in subacute-chronic stroke : a prospective randomized clinical trial of efficacy", Clinical Rehabilitation, 26(8), pp.696~704 (2012)
  22. P. Sale, "Hand robotics rehabilitation : feasibility and preliminary results of a robotic treatment in patient with hemiparesis", Stroke Research and Treatment, 2012 (2012)
  23. 정경훈, "만성 뇌졸중 환자에서 운동 기능 회복에 대한 로봇-보조 보행치료의 효과", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 32(3), pp.258~266 (2008), 대한재활의학회
  24. P.W. Duncan, "Measurement of motor recovery after stroke : Outcome assessment and sample size requirement", Stroke, 23(8), pp.1084~1089 (1992)
  25. H. Nakayama, "Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: The copenhagen stroke study", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75(8), pp.852~857 (1994)
  26. SMEDEA Co., Ltd, "Professional Rehabilitation Catalog", ~ (2010)
  27. C.A. Tromboly, "Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction" (2002), Lippncott Williams & Wilkins
  28. A.R. Fugl-Meyer, "The post-stroke patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance", Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 7(1), pp.13~31 (1975)
  29. J. Stanford, "Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke", Physical Therapy, 73(7), pp.447~454 (1993)
  30. S.J. Page, "Stroke patient's and therapist's opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy", Clinical Rehabilitation, 16(1), pp.55~60 (2002)
  31. J.H. van der Lee, "Clinimetric properties of motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients", Stroke, 35(6), pp.1410~1414 (2004)
  32. G. Uswatte, "The Motor Acitivity Log-28 : Assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke", Neurology, 67(7), pp.1189~1194 (2006)
  33. A. Mitchell, "Adult norm for a commercially available Nine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(3), pp.570~574 (2003)
  34. R.H. Jebsen, "An objective and standardized test of hand function", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 50(6), pp.311~319 (1969)
  35. S.K. Charles, "Wrist rehabilitation following stroke: Initial clinical results" (2005), Omnipress
  36. S. Hesse, "A new electromechanical trainer for sensorimotor rehabilitation of paralysed fingers : a case series in chronic and acute stroke patients", Journal of Neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 5, pp.21~26 (2008)
  37. S. Adamovich, "A virtual reality based exercise system for hand rehabilitation post-stroke : transfer to function", Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 7, pp.4936~4939 (2004)
  38. V. Brooks, "Motor mechanisms: The role of the pyramidal system in motor control", Annual Review of Physiology, 33(1), pp.337~392 (1971)
  39. D. Humphrey, "Predicting measures of motor performance from multiple cortical spike trains", Science, 170(3959), pp.758~762 (1970)
  40. F. Miles, "Concepts of motor organ ization", Annual Review of Psychology, 30(1), pp.327~362 (1979)
  41. D. Waldvogel, "The effect of movement amplitude on activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies", Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 19(11), pp.1209~1212 (1999)
  42. C.E. Cruze, "Use of a novel robotic interface to study finger motor control", Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 38(2), pp.259~268 (2009)
  43. E.B. Brokaw, "Hand Spring Operated Movement Enhancer(HandSOME) : A portable, passive hand exoskeleton for stroke rehabilitation", IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 19(4), pp.391~399 (2011)
  44. J. Stein, "Robot-Assisted Exercise for Hand Weakness After Stroke : A Pilot Study", American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 90(11), pp.887~894 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)