본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

아급성기 뇌졸중 환자에서의 상지 재활 로봇 치료의 효과

Effects of Robot-assisted Arm Training in Patients with Subacute Stroke

김지희|김현준|장철환|박효인|노세응|주민철
대한뇌신경재활학회 (Korean Society for NeuroRehabilitation)|2014.09|뇌신경재활 (Brain & NeuroRehabilitation)|제7권 제2호|pp. 111-117

2

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

balanceconsciousnessbrainstemswallowingsensory function

초록

Objective: To investigate the effects of robot-assisted arm training on motor and functional recovery of upper limb in patients with subacute stroke. Method: Thirty one subacute stroke patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. Robot-assisted arm training group received robot-assisted therapy using ArmeoⓇSpring (Hocoma Inc., Zurich, Switzerland) for thirty minutes per day and five times every week during four weeks while control group received conventional arm training with same duration and frequency as robotic group. Outcome measures were used manual muscle test (MMT) for motor strength, Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), Manual function test (MFT) for arm function, Korean-modified Barthel index (K-MBI) for activities of daily living, Korean-mini mental state examination (K-MMSE) and Computerized Neuro-Cognitive Function test software-40 (CNT-40) for cognitive function. All recruited patients underwent these evaluations before and after four weeks robot-assisted arm training. Results: Robot-assisted training on upper limb after subacute stroke showed improvement on motor strength, arm function, and activities of daily living. But change values in terms of MMT, FMA, MFT, K-MBI exhibited a no statistically significant difference compared with conventional group (p＞0.05). Conclusion: In patients with upper limb deficits after subacute stroke, Robot-assisted arm training was considered to facilitate motor and functional recovery of upper limb. But robot-assisted arm training did not significantly improve motor and arm function at 4 weeks compared with conventional arm training group. Further research is required about the comparison of conventional rehabilitation therapy group and the questions about the duration, severity of stroke.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of robot-assisted arm training on motor and functional recovery of upper limb in patients with subacute stroke. Method: Thirty one subacute stroke patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. Robot-assisted arm training group received robot-assisted therapy using ArmeoⓇSpring (Hocoma Inc., Zurich, Switzerland) for thirty minutes per day and five times every week during four weeks while control group received conventional arm training with same duration and frequency as robotic group. Outcome measures were used manual muscle test (MMT) for motor strength, Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), Manual function test (MFT) for arm function, Korean-modified Barthel index (K-MBI) for activities of daily living, Korean-mini mental state examination (K-MMSE) and Computerized Neuro-Cognitive Function test software-40 (CNT-40) for cognitive function. All recruited patients underwent these evaluations before and after four weeks robot-assisted arm training. Results: Robot-assisted training on upper limb after subacute stroke showed improvement on motor strength, arm function, and activities of daily living. But change values in terms of MMT, FMA, MFT, K-MBI exhibited a no statistically significant difference compared with conventional group (p＞0.05). Conclusion: In patients with upper limb deficits after subacute stroke, Robot-assisted arm training was considered to facilitate motor and functional recovery of upper limb. But robot-assisted arm training did not significantly improve motor and arm function at 4 weeks compared with conventional arm training group. Further research is required about the comparison of conventional rehabilitation therapy group and the questions about the duration, severity of stroke.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Skilbeck CE, "Recovery after stroke", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 46, pp.5~8 (1983)
  2. Geddes JM, "Prevalence of self reported stroke in a population in northern England", J Epidemiol Community Health, 50, pp.140~143 (1996)
  3. Gowland C, "Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment", Stroke, 24, pp.58~63 (1993)
  4. Twitchell TE, "The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man", Brain, 74(4), pp.443~480 (1951)
  5. Bobath B, "Observations on adult hemiplegia and suggestions for treatment", Physiotherapy, 45, pp.279~289 (1959)
  6. Flanagan EM, "Methods of facilitation and inhibition of motor activity", Am J Phys Med, l46, pp.1006~1011 (1967)
  7. Basmajian JV, "Stroke treatment: comparison of integrated behavioral-physical therapy vs traditional physical therapy programs", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 68, pp.267~272 (1987)
  8. Basmajian JV, "EMG feedback treatment of upper limb in hemiplegic stroke patients:a pilot study", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 63, pp.613~616 (1982)
  9. Dickstein R, "Stroke rehabilitation. Three exercise therapy approaches", Phys Ther, 66, pp.1233~1238 (1996)
  10. Lord JP, "Neuromuscular reeducation versus traditional programs for stroke rehabilitation", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 67, pp.88~91 (1986)
  11. Stern PH, "Effects of facilitation exercise techniques in stroke rehabilitation", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 51, pp.526~531 (1970)
  12. Wagenaar RC, "The functional recovery of stroke: a comparison between neuro-developmental treatment and the Brunnstrom method", Scand J Rehabil Med, 22(1), pp.1~8 (1990)
  13. Bütefisch C, "Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand", J Neuro Sci, 130, pp.59~68 (1995)
  14. Blanton S, "An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke", Phys Ther, 79, pp.847~853 (1999)
  15. Chae J, "A critical review of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for treatment of motor dysfunction in hemiplegia", Assist Technol, 12(1), pp.33~49 (2000)
  16. X-angli C, "Design of an upper limb rehabilitation robot based on medical therapy", Procedia Engineering, 15, pp.688~692 (2011)
  17. Kahn LE, "Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 3, pp.12~ (2006)
  18. Lo AC, "Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke", N Engl J Med, 362, pp.1772~1783 (2010)
  19. Lum PS, "MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study", J Rehabil Res Dev, 43(5), pp.631~642 (2006)
  20. Mehrholz J, "Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 8(4), pp.CD006876~ (2008)
  21. Mehrholz J, "Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 6, pp.CD006876~ (2012)
  22. Sanchez RJ, "Monitoring functional arm movement for hone based therapy after stroke", Proceedings of the 26th international conference of the IEEE ENgineering in Medicine and Biology Society San Francisco, pp.4787~4790 (2004)
  23. Sanchez RJ, "Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment", IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 14(3), pp.378~389 (2006)
  24. 김연희, "뇌손상 환자의 인지기능 평가를 위한 전산화 신경심리검사의 유용성", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 25(2), pp.209~216 (2001), 대한재활의학회
  25. Cauraugh J, "Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke: recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation", Stroke, 31, pp.1360~1364 (2000)
  26. 이영희, "편마비 환자의 상지 기능회복을 위한 근전도 유발 전기자극", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 27(3), pp.320~328 (2003), 대한재활의학회
  27. 손미옥, "뇌졸중 입원환자를 대상으로 한 변형 건측 상지 운동 제한 치료법의 효과", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 31(1), pp.56~62 (2007), 대한재활의학회
  28. Reinkensmeyer DJ, "Robotic assistance for upper extremity training after stroke", Stud Health Technol Inform, 145, pp.25~39 (2009)
  29. Brewer BR, "Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: A review of robotic systems and clinical results", Top Stroke Rehabil, 14(6), pp.22~44 (2007)
  30. Cameirão MS, "The Combined impact of virtual reality neurorehabilitation and its interfaces on upper extremity functional recovery in patients with chronic stroke", Stroke, 43, pp.2720~2728 (2012)
  31. Merlo A, "Upper limb evaluation with robotic exoskeleton. Normative values for indices of accuracy, speed and smothness", Neurorehanilitation, 13 (2013)
  32. Burgar CG, "Robot-assisted upper-limb therapy in acute rehabilitation setting following stroke: Department of Veterans Affairs multisite clinical trial", J Rehabil Res Dev, 48(4), pp.445~458 (2011)
  33. Masiero S, "Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial", J Rehabil Res Dev, 48(4), pp.355~366 (2011)
  34. Lo AC, "Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke", N Engl J Med, 362(19), pp.1772~1783 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

뇌졸중 환자에서 로봇 보조 상지 재활의 임상적 결과·김정수, 박시운, 서효진, 이용석대한뇌신경재활학회 · 뇌신경재활2015 · 제8권 제1호편마비환자에서 로봇 보조 상지 재활치료의 효과범재원, 서한길, 오병모, 한태륜대한뇌신경재활학회 · 뇌신경재활2014 · 제7권 제1호상지로봇치료가 아급성기 뇌졸중 환자의 팔뻗기 움직임에 미치는 단기 효과김용욱, 김종배, 박지혁, 홍원진대한신경계작업치료학회 · 재활치료과학2018 · 제7권 제4호로봇 중재가 뇌졸중 환자의 상지기능에 미치는 영향: 무작위대조연구에 대한 메타분석권재성한국보건정보통계학회 · 보건정보통계학회지2018 · 제43권 제1호Effect of Robot-Assisted Game Training on Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Patients김상범, 김진완, 이경우, 이숙정, 이종화대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2017 · 제41권 제4호로봇-보조 팔 훈련이 뇌졸중 환자의 팔에 근활성도와 체중지지에 미치는 영향양대중, 이용선대한정형도수물리치료학회 · 대한정형도수물리치료학회지2022 · 제28권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)

Novel Approaches of Non-Invasive Stimulation Techniques to Motor Rehabilitation Following Stroke: A ReviewShahid Bashirpp. 71-75허혈성 뇌졸중의 이차예방을 위한 항혈전제 치료조한진, 강태호pp. 76-85뇌졸중재활 통합측면에서 뇌졸중의 이차예방유승돈pp. 86-92뇌간의 기능적 해부김대열pp. 93-100뇌줄기 병변에 의한 운동 증상온석훈pp. 101-104
원문 보기