도시 창조성 제고를 위한 거버넌스 메커니즘 연구 - 셰필드와 허더스필드의 사례 비교 -
A study on the governance mechanism to improve the urban creativity - A comparative case of Sheffield and Huddersfield -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main purpose of this study is to discuss about what the governance mechanism to enhance the urban creativity is and how to construct this mechanism. This study compares two cities in terms of the governance mechanism. It utilizes the structure theory of Giddens which emphasizes on the dynamic interrelations between the social structure and actors. It analyses the growth process of Sheffield and Huddersfield in United Kingdom with literature review and primary data. The results show that two cities have different governance systems: one is top-down, while the other is bottom-up system. According to the system, the relation between the social structure and actors is different. The bottom-up system appears to achieve relatively higher performance in terms of the city dynamism and creativity. This implicates that it is more important to make cooperative and horizontal relationships with the spontaneous networking among actors rather than to rely on unilateral supports and requests from the central government.
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to discuss about what the governance mechanism to enhance the urban creativity is and how to construct this mechanism. This study compares two cities in terms of the governance mechanism. It utilizes the structure theory of Giddens which emphasizes on the dynamic interrelations between the social structure and actors. It analyses the growth process of Sheffield and Huddersfield in United Kingdom with literature review and primary data. The results show that two cities have different governance systems: one is top-down, while the other is bottom-up system. According to the system, the relation between the social structure and actors is different. The bottom-up system appears to achieve relatively higher performance in terms of the city dynamism and creativity. This implicates that it is more important to make cooperative and horizontal relationships with the spontaneous networking among actors rather than to rely on unilateral supports and requests from the central government.
참고문헌 (54)
- 강동진, "강동권 개발, 창조 도시로 간다", 부산발전포럼, (121) (2010)
- 강학순, "기든스(A. Giddens) 구조화 이론의 지리학적 함의와 문화경관 해석", 지리학, 27(2), pp.117~128 (1992)
- 김석준, "뉴거버너스연구" (2000), 대영문화사
- 김영, "마산시 도시재생사업 거버넌스의 특성과 평가에 관한 연구", 한국지역개발학회지, 20(4), pp.89~110 (2008), 한국지역개발학회
- 김용학, "사회 연결망 이론" (2003), 박영사
- 김중섭, "기든스의 구조화 이론과 사회행위", 8(1), pp.81~96 (1984), 한국인문사회학회
- 창조도시이론과 미래도시 발전방향에 관한 연구, "김태경", 경기개발연구원, ~, pp.제7호 (2010)
- 권영상, "면(面)적인 역사문화환경에 대한 참여 거버넌스 비교", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 27(04), pp.239~248 (2011), 대한건축학회
- 부활하는 도시의 비결, 도시재생, SERI 경영노트, "박강아", 삼성경제연구소, ~, pp.제154호 (2012)
- 박세훈, "마을만들기 참여 거버넌스의 비교분석 : 제도주의적 접근", 국토계획, 44(3), pp.207~220 (2009), 대한국토·도시계획학회
- 정원창, "창조하는 도시" (2004), 소화
- 서순탁, "거버넌스 변화에 따른 도시계획체계 개편방안 연구", 도시행정학보, 21(1), pp.85~105 (2008), 한국도시행정학회
- 안병영, "21세기 국가역할의 변화와 국정관리", 계간사상, (봄) (2000)
- 염동훈, "안토니 기든스 A. Giddens의 구조화 이론에 대한 방법론적 검토", 31(가을), pp.671~698 (1997), 한국사회학회
- 한국 마을만들기 조례의 현황과 과제: 광주광역시 북구를 중심으로, "이명규", 국토연구원, ~ (2008)
- 이종원, "거버넌스의 연구방법론과 형성전략: 시론적 이해", 동계학술대회 발제문 (2001), 한국행정학회
- 이종원, "정부형성과 거버넌스:이론적 연결고리의 탐색 및 지방 거버넌스에서의 적용", 정부학연구, 8(1), pp.3~91 (2002), 정부학연구소
- 임정빈, "지역갈등, 주민참여 그리고 거버넌스", 한국지역정보화학회지, 8(1), pp.125~151 (2005)
- 차미숙, "지역발전을 위한 거버넌스체계 구축 및 운용방안 연구" (2003), 국토연구원
- 천현숙, "파트너십 형성을 통한 도시재생방안: 영국 셰필드시 사례 연구", 국토연구, 57, pp.19~48 (2008), 국토연구원
- "인천 아·태도시정상회의, 2009. 9. 15", ~ (2009)
- Brigitte G., "Participatory Governance: Theoretic-analytical Approaches and a Case Study", Paper presented at the Fifth Pan-European International Relations Conference (2004)
- Costa, P., "On 'creative cities' governance models: a comparative approach", The Service Industries Journal, 28(3), pp.393~413 (2008)
- Florida, R., "The Rise of Creative Class" (2002), basic books
- Gbikpi, B., "From Democratic Government to Participatory Governance, In Participatory Governance: Political and Societal Implications" (2002), Leske and Budrich
- Giddens, A., "Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradictionin Social Analysis" (1979), Macmillan Press
- Giddens, A., "A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, 1, Power" (1981), Macmillan Press
- Giddens, A., "The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration" (1984), University of California Press
- Grote, R.J., "Participatory Governance: Political and SocietalImplication" (2002), Leske and Budrich
- Haliker H., "Regional Development Agencies inEurope" (1998), Jessica Kingsley Publishers
- Healey, P., "Planning through Debate: The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory, In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning", pp.233~253 (1993), UCL Press
- Heinelt, H., "ParticipatoryGovernance in Multi-Level Context" (2002), Leske and Budrich
- Jacobs, J., "The Economy of Cities" (1961), Vintage
- Kooiman, J., "Social-Political Governance: Introduction, In Modern Governance: New Goverment-Society Interactions", pp.1~6 (1993), Sage Publications
- Landry, C., "The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators" (2000), Earthsacn
- Landry, C., "Creative City Making" (2009), 역사넷
- Moss, L., "Sheffield's cultural industries quarter 20 years on: What can be learned from a pioneering example?", International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8(2), pp.211~219 (2002)
- ONS., "The 2001 Census" (2002), ONS
- Rhodes, R., "The new governance: governing without governance", Political Studies, 44(4), pp.652~667 (1996)
- Schmitter, P.C., "Participation in Governance Arrangements: Is There Any Reason to Expect It Will Achieve "Sustainable and Innovative Policies in Multilevel Context, In Participatory Governance: Political and Societal Implications" (2002), Leske and Budrich
- Stoker, G., "Public-Private Partnership and urban Governance, In Partnerships in urban Governance" (1998), Mac Millan Press
- Stocker, G., "Governance as theory: Five Propositions", International Social Science Journal, 155, pp.17~28 (1998)
- Stocker, G., "Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance?", American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), pp.41~57 (2006)
- Veenstra, G., "Home is where the governing is: social capital and regional health governance", Health & Place, 5(1), pp.1~12 (1999)
- Wood, P., "Big Ideas for a Small Town: the Huddersfield Creative Town Initiative", Local Economy, 19(4), pp.380~395 (2004)
- World Bank, "Governance and Development" (1992), The World Bank
- Young Iris Marion, "Inclusion and Democracy" (2000), Oxford University Press