『高麗末 和寧府 戶籍大帳』 斷片의 전래 경위와 순서 복원

Abstract

This paper confirmed that "Hwaryeongbu Family Registry" was created in the region of Hwaryeongbu (currently located in the Northeastern part of the Korean Peninsula) to contain records of families who lived their during the late the Goryeo Dynasty (918-1392). The confirmation is based on analyses of related articles and documentary records gleaned from diverse old books including Buknoneungjeonji, Bukdoneungjeonji, Joseonwangjosilrok, Seungjeongwonilgi, Ilseongno, Euijobyeoldeungrok, Jongmyogyesudeungrok. Besides, this paper focuses on how Hwaryeongbu Family Registry have been passed down and analyzed the method in which it was created. In the process, this paper found that there were no intentional removals in the making process and raised the possibility that some unused space in papers were trimmed to make such roll-type registry books. Previously, few paid much attention to the fact that the first line of the first section in Hwaryeongbu Family Registry was assigned for titles, which is similar in style to such record books during the Joseon Dynasty (1392~1910). This paper also confirmed that the first line has many similarities with family registry books during the Joseon Dynasty and found that the following second line indicates in which region the consensus was conducted, a similar feature seen in Joseon's family registry books. In the fifth line of the first section, this paper found such capital numbers written in Chinese character as "one," "thousand," and "three," which also showed the books were written for family registry in terms of style. By comparing the family registry book and Kyeongsangdojirijiseo, this paper confirmed that the second section serves as an introduction or a preface of a book and speculated it must be re-located next to the forefront. In addition, this paper mentioned the possibility that the third section of the book is somehow related to "Siksilbong 300 family unit scheme," devised by old dynasties to allow public servants to collect taxes from 300 families in their region in return for their national contribution. I believe this paper has provided much information on 'Hwaryeongbu Family Registry" which is enough to prompt reviews and more precise research on the old records created centuries ago. Also, it laid the groundwork for future research in comparing family registry books written both in the Goryeo and Joseon Dynasties. Among other things, this paper succeeded in drawing interest again in the possibility that the family records for slaves seen in the first section might be related to the Siksilbong 300 family unit scheme.