「담헌공행장」의 발견과 그 의의

Abstract

The research of Damheon(湛軒) Hong Dae-yong(洪大容) has been studied focusing on Damheonseo(湛軒書) and Yeonhaengrok(燕行錄). His materials, such as Damheonseo and Yeonhaengrok, are clearly important, but there is a problem that they are not complete. For this reason, Damheonseo(湛軒書) is also the starting point of Hong Dae-yong’s research, but there is a contradiction that can be an obstacle. Therefore, it is necessary to read the materials related to Hong Dae-yong again or upside down. In addition, the discovery of new materials for Hong Dae-yong can always be an important turning point. The newly discovered Damheongonghaengjang(湛軒公行狀) is meaningful in that regard. Damheongonghaengjang written by Hong Yang-hoo(洪良厚), who was his second grandson was written for the purpose of replacing the tombstone of Hong Dae-yong, which was previously written by Lee Song(李淞). Moreover, it was a projection of Hong Dae-yong’s household or Hong Yang-hoo’s perception of Hong Dae-yong, and he tried to raise his awareness by borrowing Kim Heung-geun(金興根)’s recognition. In other words, the contents of the Haengjang(行狀) were described as they were in the tombstone name written by Kim Heung-geun. In the end, due to the excavation of the Damheongonghaengjang, it was newly confirmed that the existing tombstone name was the evaluation of Hong Yang-hoo, not the result of Kim Heung-geun’s awareness. In addition, it became clear how Hong Yang-hoo’s grandfather, Hong Dae-yong was evaluated.