Ku complex suppresses recombination in the absence of MRX activity during budding yeast meiosis
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
During meiosis, programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired via recombination pathways that are required for faithful chromosomal segregation and genetic diversity. In meiotic progression, the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway is suppressed and instead meiotic recombination initiated by nucleolytic resection of DSB ends is the major pathway employed. This requires diverse recombinase proteins and regulatory factors involved in the formation of crossovers (COs) and non-crossovers (NCOs). In mitosis, spontaneous DSBs occurring at the G1 phase are predominantly repaired via NHEJ, mediating the joining of DNA ends. The Ku complex binds to these DSB ends, inhibiting additional DSB resection and mediating end joining with Dnl4, Lif1, and Nej1, which join the Ku complex and DSB ends. Here, we report the role of the Ku complex in DSB repair using a physical analysis of recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during meiosis. We found that the Ku complex is not essential for meiotic progression, DSB formation, joint molecule formation, or CO/NCO formation during normal meiosis. Surprisingly, in the absence of the Ku complex and functional Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (MRX) complex, a large portion of meiotic DSBs was repaired via the recombination pathway to form COs and NCOs. Our data suggested that Ku complex prevents meiotic recombination in the elimination of MRX activity.
Abstract
During meiosis, programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired via recombination pathways that are required for faithful chromosomal segregation and genetic diversity. In meiotic progression, the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway is suppressed and instead meiotic recombination initiated by nucleolytic resection of DSB ends is the major pathway employed. This requires diverse recombinase proteins and regulatory factors involved in the formation of crossovers (COs) and non-crossovers (NCOs). In mitosis, spontaneous DSBs occurring at the G1 phase are predominantly repaired via NHEJ, mediating the joining of DNA ends. The Ku complex binds to these DSB ends, inhibiting additional DSB resection and mediating end joining with Dnl4, Lif1, and Nej1, which join the Ku complex and DSB ends. Here, we report the role of the Ku complex in DSB repair using a physical analysis of recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during meiosis. We found that the Ku complex is not essential for meiotic progression, DSB formation, joint molecule formation, or CO/NCO formation during normal meiosis. Surprisingly, in the absence of the Ku complex and functional Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (MRX) complex, a large portion of meiotic DSBs was repaired via the recombination pathway to form COs and NCOs. Our data suggested that Ku complex prevents meiotic recombination in the elimination of MRX activity.
참고문헌 (35)
- 정우현, "To Peep into Pif1 Helicase: Multifaceted All the Way from Genome Stability to Repair-Associated DNA Synthesis", The Journal of Microbiology, 52(2), pp.89~98 (2014), 한국미생물학회[DOI]
- 최도희, "Hrq1 Functions Independently of Sgs1 to Preserve Genome Integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae", The Journal of Microbiology, 51(1), pp.105~112 (2013), 한국미생물학회[DOI]
- Sung P, "Introduction to the Thematic Minireview Series : DNA double-strand break repair and pathway choice", J Biol Chem, 293, pp.10500~10501 (2018)
- Haber JE, "DNA Repair : The Search for Homology", BioEssays, 40, pp.1700229~ (2018)
- Fouquin A, "PARP2controls double-strand break repair pathway choice by limiting 53BP1 accumulation at DNA damage sites and promoting end-resection", Nucleic Acids Res, 45, pp.12325~12339 (2017)
- Daley JM, "DNA Joint dependence of Pol X family polymerase action in nonhomologous end joining", J Biol Chem, 280, pp.29030~29037 (2005)
- Cannavo E, "Regulatory control of DNA end resection by Sae2 phosphorylation", Nat Commun, 9, pp.4016~ (2018)
- Kim KP, "Sister cohesion and structural axis components mediate homolog bias of meiotic recombination", Cell, 143, pp.924~937 (2010)
- Hong S, "The logic and mechanism of homologous recombination partner choice", Mol Cell, 51, pp.440~453 (2013)
- 홍수길, "Shu1 Promotes Homolog Bias of Meiotic Recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae", Molecules and Cells, 36(5), pp.446~454 (2013), 한국분자세포생물학회
- Yoon SW, "Meiotic prophase roles of Rec8 in crossover recombination and chromosome structure", Nucleic Acids Res, 44, pp.9296~9314 (2016)
- Marcon E, "The evolution of meiosis : Recruitment and modification of somatic DNA-repair proteins", Bioessays, 27, pp.795~808 (2005)
- Lam I, "Mechanism and regulation of meiotic recombination initiation", Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 7, pp.a016634~ (2015)[DOI]
- Gobbini E, "Functions and regulation of the MRX complex at DNA double-strand breaks", Microbial Cell, 3, pp.329~337 (2016)
- Seeber A, "RPA mediates recruitment of MRX to forks and double-strand breaks to hold sister chromatids together", Molecular Cell, 64, pp.951~966 (2016)
- Chen H, "Sae2promotes DNA damage resistance by removing the Mre11–Rad50–Xrs2 complex from DNA and attenuating Rad53 signaling", Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 112, pp.E1880~E1887 (2015)[DOI]
- Hefferin ML, "Mechanism of DNA double-strand break repair by non-homologous end joining", DNA Repair, 4, pp.639~648 (2005)
- Huertas P, "Human CtIP mediates cell cycle control of DNA end resection and double strand break repair", J Biol Chem, 284, pp.9558~9565 (2009)
- Huertas P, "CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination", Nature, 455, pp.689~692 (2008)
- Mimitou EP, "DNA end resection-unraveling the tail", DNA Repair (Amst), 10, pp.344~348 (2011)
- Kim KP, "So similar yet so different : The two ends of a double strand break", Mutat Res, 809, pp.70~80 (2018)
- Tsukamoto Y, "Hdf1, a yeast Ku-protein homologue, is involved in illegitimate recombination, but not in homologous recombination", Nucleic Acids Res, 24, pp.2067~2072 (1996)
- Gu Y, "Ku70-deficient embryonic stem cells have increased ionizing radiosensitivity, defective DNA end-binding activity, and inability to support V(D)J recombination", Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 94, pp.8076~8081 (1997)
- Sorenson KS, "The non-homologous end-joining factor Nej1inhibits resection mediated by Dna2–Sgs1 nucleasehelicase at DNA double strand breaks", J Biol Chem, 292, pp.14576~14586 (2017)
- Pannunzio NR, "Nonhomologous DNA end-joining for repair of DNA double-strand breaks", J Biol Chem, 293, pp.10512~10523 (2018)
- Lieber MR, "The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway", Ann Rev Biochem, 79, pp.181~211 (2010)
- Valencia M, "NEJ1controls non-homologous end joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae", Nature, 414, pp.666~669 (2001)
- 이민수, "Mitotic Cohesin Subunit Mcd1 Regulates the Progression of Meiotic Recombination in Budding Yeast", Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 25(5), pp.598~605 (2015), 한국미생물·생명공학회[DOI]
- 조홍래, "Hop2 and Sae3 Are Required for Dmc1-Mediated Double-Strand Break Repair via Homolog Bias during Meiosis", Molecules and Cells, 39(7), pp.550~556 (2016), 한국분자세포생물학회[DOI]
- 홍수길, "Ycs4 is Required for Efficient Double-Strand Break Formation and Homologous Recombination During Meiosis", Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 25(7), pp.1026~1035 (2015), 한국미생물·생명공학회[DOI]
- Yin Y, "Impaired resection of meiotic duble-strand breaks channels repair to nonhomologous end joining in caenorhabditis elegans", Mol Cell Biol, 33, pp.2732~2747 (2013)
- Ho HC, "Pch2 Acts through Xrs2and Tel1", ATM to modulate interhomolog bias and checkpoint function during meiosis, 2011, pp.7, e1002351~
- Hunter N, "Meiotic Recombination. molecular genetics of recombination, Topics in Current Genetics", pp.381~442 (2006), Springer-Verlag
- Neale M, "Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks", Nature, 436, pp.1053~1057 (2005)
- Sushil Devkota, "The road less traveled: strategies to enhance the frequency of homology-directed repair (HDR) for increased efficiency of CRISPR", Cas-mediated transgenesis, 2018, pp.51(9), 437~443[DOI]