본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Kolb의 학습자 유형에 따른 생성형 AI 활용 PBL 경험연구 - K대학 교양교과목 <디지털 거버넌스>를 중심으로

Generative AI in Project-Based Learning: Insights from Kolb's Experiential Learning Model

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Chat GPT와 같은 생성형AI의 교육적 활용이 증가하면서, 학습자의 개인차를 고려한 효과적인 활용 방안에 관한 다양한 연구가 필요하다. 본 연구는 Kolb가 제시한 학습자 유형을 바탕으로 생성형AI 활용 PBL 과정으로 설계한 <디지털 거버넌스> 교양교과목 사례에서 나타난 생성형AI 활용 경험을 탐색하였다. 이를 위해 수강생을 대상으로 Kolb의 4가지 학습 유형별 개별 심층 인터뷰를 수행하였다. 인터뷰 결과를 바탕으로 ‘생성형AI 활용 PBL 기반-실행-환류’의 3가지 단계에서 학습자의 경험을 분석하였다. 분석 결과 기반 단계에서는 학생의 학습 스타일 뿐만 아니라 신기술에 대한 인지와 인식에 따라 다른 활용 경험을 보였다. 실행 단계에서 확산형은 다량 정보 취합에 생성형AI 활용을 긍정적으로 평가하였으며, 이러한 기능이 인간의 창의적 활동의 보조적 도구로 의미가 있다고 평가하였다. 동화형은 개념의 체계적 이해와 논리 구성과정에 생성형AI를 주로 활용하였다. 수렴형은 문제 해결의 실질적 방안에 대한 의사결정 과정에 생성형AI 활용 의미를 두었고, 적응형은 PBL에서의 생성형AI 활용 경험을 타 교과 및 학습에 적용해 확장하였다. 환류 단계에서 학습자들은 생성형AI의 한계와 가능성에 대한 판단을 정립하였으며, 수업 참여 전후 생성형AI 활용에 대한 인식과 접근 방식이 달라졌다고 밝혔다. 이를 통해 본 연구에서는 학습자 유형을 고려해, 보다 효과적으로 생성형AI를 PBL 학습에 통합할 수 있는 실천적 시사점을 제시하였다.

Abstract

As generative AI tools like ChatGPT become more integrated into education, exploring strategies for their effective use, particularly considering individual learner differences, is increasingly important. This study examines the experiences of employing generative AI across the four learning styles proposed by Kolb’s experiential learning theory, within a project-based learning (PBL) course designed to integrate generative AI in university. In-depth interviews were conducted with learners representing the four types. Based on the results of the interviews, we analyzed learners' experiences in three phases of PBL using generative AI: foundation, execution, and reflection. In the foundation phase, students had varied experiences depending on their learning styles as well as their awareness and perceptions of the new technology. Analysis of the execution phase revealed that divergers perceived the use of generative AI as a highly effective phase for synthesizing large volumes of information and recognized its value as a complementary tool in supporting human creativity. Assimilators primarily engaged with generative AI to facilitate the systematic comprehension of concepts and the construction of logical frameworks. Convergers emphasized its utility in decision-making processes aimed at devising practical solutions to problems. Accommodators extended their experience with generative AI in PBL by applying it across other subjects and learning contexts. In the reflection phase, learners assessed the limitations and potential of generative AI and reported changes in their perceptions and approaches to its use before and after the class. This study offers practical implications for enhancing the effective integration of generative AI into education by considering diverse learning styles.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 김경희, "디지털 도구를 활용한 교양교육 수업사례- <영미문학과 영화> 교양수업을 중심으로", 교양교육실천연구, 6(2), pp.35~55 (2022)
  2. 김상현, "Kolb 학습양식 검사지를 이용한 의과대학생의 학습양식분석", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 19(3), pp.197~205 (2007)
  3. 김시정, "디지털 전환시대 공공부문의 협력적 문제해결 역량 교육을 위한 PBL 적용 탐색", 한국인사행정학회보, 22(1), pp.121~152 (2023)
  4. 생성형 AI를 활용한 교수학습 프레임워크 개발 연구, "박선아", 한국교육학술정보원, ~, pp.연구보고 RR 2024-01 (2024)
  5. 성창환, "학습자 유형에 따른 개인 학습의 차이 연구", The Journal of the Convergence on Culturer Technology(JCCT), 8(3), pp.377~384 (2022)
  6. 임세영, "실천공학 교수법 : Kolb 학습유형검사의 한글버전개발", 실천공학교육논문지, 4(1), pp.30~44 (2012)
  7. 최순리, "Kolb의 경험학습이론 관점에서 비대면 비교과 프로그램 학습경험의학습양식과 경험학습 단계에 대한 관계 연구", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 22(15), pp.479~494 (2022)
  8. Abdelghani, R., "GPT-3-driven pedagogical agents to train children’s curious question-asking skills", International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(2), pp.483~518 (2024)
  9. Al Shloul, T., "Role of activity-based learning and Chat GPT on students’ performance in education", Computers and Education : Artificial Intelligence, 100219 (2024)
  10. Blumenfeld, P. C., "Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning", Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), pp.369~398 (1991)
  11. Bolick, A. D., "Exploring artificial intelligence tools and their potential impact to instructional design workflows and organizational systems", TechTrends, 68(1), pp.91~100 (2024)
  12. Bozkurt, A., "Generative artificial intelligence(AI)powered conversational educational agents : The inevitable paradigm shift", Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1) (2023)
  13. Halaweh, M., "Chat GPT in education : Strategies for responsible implementation", Contemporary educational technology, 15(2) (2023)
  14. Jones, B. D., "Motivating students to engage in learning : the MUSIC model of academic motivation", International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(2), pp.272~285 (2009)
  15. Kasneci, E., "Chat GPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education", Learning and individual differences, 103, pp.102274~ (2023)
  16. Kolb, D. A., "Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development" (1984), Prentice Hall
  17. Kolb, D. A., "Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development" (2014), FT press
  18. Lindgren M., "Scenario planning: the link between future and strategy" (2002), Palgrave Macmillan
  19. Lim, W. M., "Generative AI and the future of education : Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators", The international journal of management education, 21(2), pp.100790~ (2023)
  20. Ouyang, F., "Artificial intelligence in education : The three paradigms", Computers and Education : Artificial Intelligence, 2, pp.100020~ (2021)
  21. Peters, R. A., "Long-term trends accentuate the import of creative and critical thinking skills developed by design thinking and ill-defined questions", Teaching Public Administration, 35(2), pp.190~208 (2017)
  22. Rahman, M. M., "Chat GPT for education and research : Opportunities, threats, and strategies", Applied Sciences, 13(9), pp.5783~ (2023)
  23. Sallam, M., "Chat GPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice : systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns", Healthcare, 11(6), pp.887~ (2023)
  24. Sardana, D., "Chat GPT : A disruptive innovation or disrupting innovation in academia?", The Journal of the American Dental Association, 154(5), pp.361~364 (2023)
  25. Sharp, J. E., "Combining Kolb learning styles and writing to learn in engineering classes", Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), pp.93~101 (1997)
  26. Shoufan, A., "Exploring students’ perceptions of Chat GPT : Thematic analysis and follow-up survey", IEEE Access, 11, pp.38805~38818 (2023)
  27. Su, J., "Unlocking the power of Chat GPT : A framework for applying generative AI in education", ECNU Review of Education, 6(3), pp.355~366 (2023)
  28. Thorp, H. H., "Chat GPT is fun, but not an author", Science, 379(6630), pp.313~313 (2023)
  29. Wood, D., "Evaluating the impact of students’ generative AI use in educational contexts", Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 17(2), pp.152~167 (2024)
  30. Young, S. F., "Assessment and learning: The ICE approach" (2000), Portage & Main Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)