본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

A Study on Canada’s Response Systems for TERRORISM and Emerging Trends

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study aims to analyze Canada’s legal and institutional basis of counter-terrorism activities, response agencies and systems and its national policy framework for terrorism in order to find political implications that can be applied to South Korea. This study revealed that Canada has recently granted top-level information gathering authority to counter-terrorism organizations, such as the CSIS and the RCMP, based on the 『Anti-terrorism Act, 2015』 and other relevant laws on terrorism. In fact, the CSIS serves the role of the Integrated Terrorism Assessment Center(ITAC) of Canada by focusing most of the organization's capabilities on collecting intelligence information on domestic and international terrorism. In addition, through the Government Security Screening Program, the CSIS has implemented strict human security checks and strengthened security screening on the US border, as well as radically blocking terrorists’ financial flow into Canada by working in conjunction with the Canada Revenue Agency. In parallel, the RCMP has expanded its 'National Security Criminal Investigations Program' to focus on collecting evidences and investigating terrorists, making significant effort to strengthen investigative capacity towards suspected support for terrorist financing. Therefore, through such examples of Canada, the following measures can be considered for South Korea: First, in order to strengthen the capabilities of the National Police Agency, which is in charge of collecting information on domestic terrorism, the authority to collect information on terrorist suspects currently granted only to the head of the National Intelligence Service in accordance with the 「Act on Counter-Terrorism for the Protection of Citizens and Public Security」 must be also granted to the Commissioner of the National Police Agency. Moreover, the “Counter-Terrorism Division” under the National Police Agency's Security Bureau should be reorganized into the Counterterrorism Office/Counterterrorism Information Center directly under the Commissioner of the National Police Agency. Second, Article 9 of the 「Act on Counter-Terrorism for the Protection of Citizens and Public Security」 needs to be amended to strengthen the information gathering capabilities of the National Intelligence Service and the National Police Agency while enabling strict legal control over various information collection activities. This will ensure that information gathering activities for terrorist suspects can be strictly conducted under the principle of warrant. Third, counter-terrorism agencies, such as the National Intelligence Service and the National Police Agency, must establish an uncomplicated inter-country cooperation system with the United States, Interpol and other foreign bodies, while actively participating in the activities of international organizations related to terrorism, including Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering(FATF), to improve the capability to collect information and respond to terrorism. Fourth, South Korea's investigative agencies should cooperate with foreign authorities to promote the exchange of investigative information and data on new aspects and methods of terrorism. In addition, effective investigation, prosecution and punishment for terrorists should be in place by strengthening the capabilities for initial investigation, such as prompt on-site dispatch and on-site investigation, in the event of terrorism and enhancing scientific investigation capabilities for illegal funds, explosives, drugs, and weapons related to terrorism.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze Canada’s legal and institutional basis of counter-terrorism activities, response agencies and systems and its national policy framework for terrorism in order to find political implications that can be applied to South Korea. This study revealed that Canada has recently granted top-level information gathering authority to counter-terrorism organizations, such as the CSIS and the RCMP, based on the 『Anti-terrorism Act, 2015』 and other relevant laws on terrorism. In fact, the CSIS serves the role of the Integrated Terrorism Assessment Center(ITAC) of Canada by focusing most of the organization's capabilities on collecting intelligence information on domestic and international terrorism. In addition, through the Government Security Screening Program, the CSIS has implemented strict human security checks and strengthened security screening on the US border, as well as radically blocking terrorists’ financial flow into Canada by working in conjunction with the Canada Revenue Agency. In parallel, the RCMP has expanded its 'National Security Criminal Investigations Program' to focus on collecting evidences and investigating terrorists, making significant effort to strengthen investigative capacity towards suspected support for terrorist financing. Therefore, through such examples of Canada, the following measures can be considered for South Korea: First, in order to strengthen the capabilities of the National Police Agency, which is in charge of collecting information on domestic terrorism, the authority to collect information on terrorist suspects currently granted only to the head of the National Intelligence Service in accordance with the 「Act on Counter-Terrorism for the Protection of Citizens and Public Security」 must be also granted to the Commissioner of the National Police Agency. Moreover, the “Counter-Terrorism Division” under the National Police Agency's Security Bureau should be reorganized into the Counterterrorism Office/Counterterrorism Information Center directly under the Commissioner of the National Police Agency. Second, Article 9 of the 「Act on Counter-Terrorism for the Protection of Citizens and Public Security」 needs to be amended to strengthen the information gathering capabilities of the National Intelligence Service and the National Police Agency while enabling strict legal control over various information collection activities. This will ensure that information gathering activities for terrorist suspects can be strictly conducted under the principle of warrant. Third, counter-terrorism agencies, such as the National Intelligence Service and the National Police Agency, must establish an uncomplicated inter-country cooperation system with the United States, Interpol and other foreign bodies, while actively participating in the activities of international organizations related to terrorism, including Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering(FATF), to improve the capability to collect information and respond to terrorism. Fourth, South Korea's investigative agencies should cooperate with foreign authorities to promote the exchange of investigative information and data on new aspects and methods of terrorism. In addition, effective investigation, prosecution and punishment for terrorists should be in place by strengthening the capabilities for initial investigation, such as prompt on-site dispatch and on-site investigation, in the event of terrorism and enhancing scientific investigation capabilities for illegal funds, explosives, drugs, and weapons related to terrorism.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Public Safety Canada, "National Strategy on Countering Radicalization to Violence", Government of Canada, ~ (2016)
  2. Mosley Richard G, "Preventing Terrorism Bill C-36: The Anti-terrorism Act 2001", Terrorism, Law and Democracy, ~ (2012)
  3. Ligue Des Droits et Libertés, "The Anti-terrorism Act, 2001: A Misleading, Useless and... Dangerous Law", The Ligue Des Droits et Libertés, ~ (2005)
  4. 조성제, "제3세계 국가의 테러방지법제정과 우리나라에 있어서 시사점", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 9(10), pp.274~283 (2009), 한국콘텐츠학회
  5. 박기주, "테러자금세탁방지를 위한 국내외적 대응전략", 한국테러학회보, 5(2), pp.48~71 (2012), 한국테러학회
  6. Minister of Public Safety, "Building Resilience against Terrorism: Canada's Counter-terrorism Strat-egy", Government of Canada, ~ (2013)
  7. Public Safety Canada, "Federal Terrorism Response Plan: Domestic Concept of Operations", Gov-ernment of Canada, ~ (2018)
  8. Public Safety Canada, "2013 Public Report on the Terrorist Threat to Canada", Government of Can-ada, ~ (2013)
  9. Hofmann DC, "How Alone are Lone-actors? Exploring the Ideological, Signaling, and Support Net-works of Lone-actor Terrorists", Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 18(2), pp.657~678 (2018)
  10. "The Guardian International Edition", ~ (2014)
  11. "The Guardian International Edition", ~ (2015)
  12. Csis Public Report 2019: A Safe, Secure and Prosperous Canada through Trusted IntellIgence and Advice, "Canadian Security Intelligence Service", Public Works and Government Services Canada, ~ (2020)
  13. Dittmer J, "Everyday Diplomacy : UKUSA Intelligence Cooperation and Geopolitical Assemblages", Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(3), pp.604~619 (2015)
  14. Lim JT, "A Study on the Canadian Police", Police Science Institute, 17, pp.113~150 (2005)
  15. Tierney M, "Assessing Canada’s Integrated National Security Enforcement Teams: Can the Concept of INSETs be Exported?", The Combating Terrorism Exchange(CTX), 6(3), pp.39~47 (2016)
  16. 함혜현, "경찰의 대테러 정보수집 발전방안에 관한 연구: 국가정보기관과의 비교연구를 중심으로", 한국경찰학회보, 19(5), pp.333~367 (2017), 한국경찰학회
  17. "The Financial News", ~ (2019)
  18. 장노순, "테러와 정보의 억지전략 -미국에서 국내정보의 변화를 중심으로-", 한국테러학회보, 5(1), pp.184~209 (2012), 한국테러학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)