본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사회권의 성격과 사법구제 가능성 -헌법재판에서의 사법구제 가능성을 중심으로-

The Nature of ESCR and its Justiciability: focusing on constitutional jurisprudence

0

조회

0

다운로드

16

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The economic, social and cultural rights(hereinafter “ESCR”) have been treated differently with the civil and political rights(hereinafter “CPR”) in terms of the nature of rights, in both domestic and international law. Despite the prescription of rights on the international covenant on the ESCR, the notion of treating these rights differently has been persistent due to the misunderstanding of the nature of the ESCR. In this paper I define the legal nature of the ESCR and discuss the justiciability thereof. In regard to the nature of the ESCR, the traditional dichotomy between the ESCR and the CPR, which treats the CPR as an immediate implementation and the ESCR as a progressive realization, should be overcome. States can discharge the obligation to respect and the obligation to protect immediately in accordance with the ESCR. In addition, not all the obligations of the CPR can be implemented immediately. In other words, the obligation to fulfill or promote entails resources and time. Therefore, the obligation to fulfill or promote will be progressively realized. Furthermore, a set of ESCR provisions, such as the non-discrimination between men and women in working conditions and compulsory primary education are considered to be immediately implemented. Thus, it is critical and realistic to discern obligations of immediate implementation and progressive realization in order to protect and promote the ESCR. It is necessary to avoid the dogma that the ESCR are not justiciable. There can be cases where the ESCR are subject to judicial review. Executive orders, regulations, actions and commission and ommission of the legislative branch are subject to judicial review as well by constitutional complaints. This is illustrated by the jurisprudence of the South African Constitutional Court’s decisions and other cases. In this perspective, the judgements of the Korean Constitutional Court regarding the ESCR, with the Court’s reasoning based on the obsolete dichotomy between the CPR and the ESCR, are far behind the international human rights standards. Thus, it is crucial to promptly recognize the nature of the ESCR.

Abstract

The economic, social and cultural rights(hereinafter “ESCR”) have been treated differently with the civil and political rights(hereinafter “CPR”) in terms of the nature of rights, in both domestic and international law. Despite the prescription of rights on the international covenant on the ESCR, the notion of treating these rights differently has been persistent due to the misunderstanding of the nature of the ESCR. In this paper I define the legal nature of the ESCR and discuss the justiciability thereof. In regard to the nature of the ESCR, the traditional dichotomy between the ESCR and the CPR, which treats the CPR as an immediate implementation and the ESCR as a progressive realization, should be overcome. States can discharge the obligation to respect and the obligation to protect immediately in accordance with the ESCR. In addition, not all the obligations of the CPR can be implemented immediately. In other words, the obligation to fulfill or promote entails resources and time. Therefore, the obligation to fulfill or promote will be progressively realized. Furthermore, a set of ESCR provisions, such as the non-discrimination between men and women in working conditions and compulsory primary education are considered to be immediately implemented. Thus, it is critical and realistic to discern obligations of immediate implementation and progressive realization in order to protect and promote the ESCR. It is necessary to avoid the dogma that the ESCR are not justiciable. There can be cases where the ESCR are subject to judicial review. Executive orders, regulations, actions and commission and ommission of the legislative branch are subject to judicial review as well by constitutional complaints. This is illustrated by the jurisprudence of the South African Constitutional Court’s decisions and other cases. In this perspective, the judgements of the Korean Constitutional Court regarding the ESCR, with the Court’s reasoning based on the obsolete dichotomy between the CPR and the ESCR, are far behind the international human rights standards. Thus, it is crucial to promptly recognize the nature of the ESCR.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 김대순, "국제법(제11판)" (2005), 삼영사
  2. 박찬운, "인권법" (2008), 도서출판 한울
  3. 박찬운, "국제인권법" (1999), 도서출판 한울
  4. 박찬운, "국제인권규범의 국내적 이행을 위한 국가인권기구의 역할: 국제적 흐름과 한국의 상황 in 법학논총" (2006)
  5. 박찬운, "국제인권법에서 바라본 사회권의 법적 성격 in 인권과 정의" (2006)
  6. 박찬운, "한국사회 빈곤층의 사회권 확보를 위한 국가의 의무와 국가인권위원회의 역할", 한양법학, 21 (2007)
  7. 홍성방, "헌법재판소결정례에 나타난 사회적 기본권", 서강법학연구, 4 (2002)
  8. 국가인권위원회, "2007년 사회권 심포지엄(2007. 4. 25) 자료집 in 2007 빈곤과 사회권: 기초생활 취약 계층의 생존권 보호와 국가의 의무" (2007)
  9. 申惠?, "人權條約上の 國家の 義務" (1999), 日本評論社
  10. 阿部浩己, "國際人權의 地平" (2002), 現代人文社
  11. 宮崎繁樹, "解說 國際人權規約" (1996), 日本評論社
  12. 申惠?, "(財)アジア 太平洋 人權情報センタ?" (1999), 現代人文社
  13. Asbjorn Eide, "Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Universal Challenge in Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Textbook" (2001)
  14. "General Comment No.3(Fifth session, 1990), Report of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, UN Doc. E", 1991, pp.1990, ~
  15. Geofff Budlender, "Justiciability of Socio-Economic Rights: Some South African Experience in Economic, Social & Cultural Rights in Practice" (2004), Interights
  16. International Commission of Jurists, "International Commission of Jurists, Courts and the Legal Enforcement of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Comparative experiences of justiciability", ~ (2008)
  17. Matthew Craven, "The International Covenant on Economic" (1995), Social and Cultural Rights: A Perspective on Its Development
  18. "Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Handbook for National Human Rights Institutions, Professional Training Series No. 12", ~ (2005)
  19. "The Maastricht Guidelines on Violation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 20", ~ (1998)
  20. "The Limburg Principles on the Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, UN Doc. E", CN.4, 17, Annex; Human Rights Quarterly, Vol.9 (1987), 1987[DOI]
  21. Victor Dankwa, "Commentary to the Maastricht Guidelines on Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights", Human Rights Quarterly, 20 (1988)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)