최근 공정거래관련 집단소송제 도입을 위한 공정거래법개정안에 대한 고찰
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
While there is little doubt that class action may not only encourage antitrust victims to bring a case before the courts but also discourage firms to violate the law, there also exists critics against class action that emphasis on a possibility of abuse of class action. Recently the Saenuri Party drafted the Bill for Antitrust Class Action in Korea. Of course it is good news for consumers at large. However it should be noted that the Saenuri Party’s Bill contain many clauses that may unreasonably restrict motion of class action. So it seems that even if the Bill’s passed, class action might not be actively filed by antitrust victims. In order to avoid this undesirable outcome, the Bill should be modified to allow victims to file class actions in more easier way to purse their own right to compensation for damages.
Abstract
While there is little doubt that class action may not only encourage antitrust victims to bring a case before the courts but also discourage firms to violate the law, there also exists critics against class action that emphasis on a possibility of abuse of class action. Recently the Saenuri Party drafted the Bill for Antitrust Class Action in Korea. Of course it is good news for consumers at large. However it should be noted that the Saenuri Party’s Bill contain many clauses that may unreasonably restrict motion of class action. So it seems that even if the Bill’s passed, class action might not be actively filed by antitrust victims. In order to avoid this undesirable outcome, the Bill should be modified to allow victims to file class actions in more easier way to purse their own right to compensation for damages.
참고문헌 (44)
- "독점규제 및 공정거래에 관한 법률 일부개정법률안 (의안번호 1345)", ~ (2012)
- 김광록, "미국 증권집단소송의 최근 동향과 우리나라 증권관련집단소송법에 대한 시사점", 기업법연구, 25(2), pp.291~322 (2011), 한국기업법학회
- 金炳淵, "증권집단소송(Securities Class Action)의 도입필요성에 관한 연구", 비교사법, 10(1), pp.579~606 (2003), 한국비교사법학회
- 김주명, "증권관련집단소송제의 미활성화, 그 원인, 문제점 및 개선방안", 기업지배구조연구, 25 (2007)
- 김한종, "증권집단소송제도의 활성화방안에 관한 연구", 홍익법학, 10(3), pp.389~420 (2009), 법학연구소
- 김홍엽, "미국 Class Action의 법리와 실제", 재판자료, (58) (1992)
- 김홍규, "證券關聯集團訴訟制의 導入과 濫訴의 防止", 상장협연구, (49) (2004)
- 權赫宰, "영국의 집단소송제도", 저스티스, 76, pp.145~166 (2003), 한국법학원
- 권혁재, "독일의 단체소송제도", 민사법이론과 실무 (2010)
- 권혁재, "프랑스의 단체소송 제도", 법학논고, (35), pp.329~352 (2011), 법학연구원
- 문기석, "미국집단소송제의 최근 동향에 대한 고찰- 美國 2005년 集團訴訟 公正法을 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 21(3), pp.455~474 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 박희주, "프랑스의 그룹소송(프랑스식 집단소송) 도입에 관한 최근 동향", 소비자정책동향, (18) (2010)
- 신종석, "증권관련집단소송에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (34), pp.295~318 (2009), 한국법학회
- 조진원, "증권관련집단소송법의 입법론적 고찰 : 남소방지를 중심으로", 법학연구, (16), pp.475~495 (2004), 한국법학회
- 이상돈, "부작용만 많은 집단소송", 시민과 변호사, (113) (2003)
- 이상돈, "집단소송에 대한 비판적 연구", 민사소송, 8(1), pp.306~334 (2004), 한국민사소송법학회
- 이선희, "우리 나라의 독점규제법과 사적 집행의 발전", 성균관법학, 23(1), pp.25~64 (2011), 법학연구소
- 오정후, "증권관련집단소송법에 대한 민사소송법적 고찰", 증권법연구, 5(1), pp.255~283 (2004), 한국증권법학회
- 윤창술, "증권집단소송의 남소방지제도", 한양법학, 17 (2005)
- 장덕조, "증권관련집단소송법안의 검토", 민주법학, 24, pp.13~407 (2003), 민주주의법학연구회
- 전삼현, "증권집단소송의 현재와 문제점", 기업소송연구 (2008)
- 정선주, "집단분쟁의 효율적인 해결과 대량소송의 방지를 위한 대표소송제도의 신설", 민사소송, 15(2), pp.245~278 (2011), 한국민사소송법학회
- 차문호, "미국 집단소송제도의 운영", 재판자료, (107) (2005)
- 한석훈, "증권집단소송의 남소방지대책", 기업법연구, (16), pp.67~88 (2004), 한국기업법학회
- 함영주, "“불법집단행위에 관한 집단소송법안”과 “집단소송법안”에 대한 의견", 민사소송, 13(1), pp.693~704 (2009), 한국민사소송법학회
- 한충수, "증권관련집단소송법의 허가요건과 허가절차상의 몇 가지 문제점", 인권과 정의, (331), pp.156~172 (2004), 대한변호사협회
- Ashurst, "Study on the conditions of claims for damages in case of infringement of EC competition rules", ~ (2004)
- Backhaus, Jürgen G., "The Law and Economics of Class Actions in Europe: Lessons from America" (2012), Edward Elgar Publisher
- Bondi, Bradley J., "Facilitating Economic Recovery and Sustainable Growth through Reform of the Securities Class-Action System: Exploring Arbitration as an Alternative to Litigation", Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 33 (2010)
- Bronsteen, John, "The Class Action Rule", Notre Dam L. Rev, 78, pp.1419~ (2003)
- Calabresi, Guido, "Class action in the U.S. experience: the legal perspective" (2012)
- Cound, John J., "Civil Procedure: Cases and Materials, 7th ed" (1997), West Group
- Coffee, John C., "Reforming the Securities Class Action: An Essay on Deterrence and its Implication", Colum. L. Rev, 106, pp.1534~ (2006)
- Deal, Carl, "The CALA Files: The Secret Campaign by Big Tobacco and Other Major Industries to Take Away Your Rights" (2000), The Center for Justice & Democracy and Public Citizen
- EC, "White Paper on Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules", COM, 165~ (2008)
- The Role of Opt-Outs and Objectors in Class Action Litigation: Theoretical and Empirical Issues, "Eisenberg, Theodore", NYU, ~, pp.04-019 (2004)
- Foer, Albert A., "The Next Antitrust Agenda: The American Antitrust Institute’s Transition Report on Competition Policy to the 44th President of the United States" (2008), Vandeplas Publishing
- Friendly, Henry J., "Federal Jurisdiction: A General View" (1973), Columbia University Press
- "Germany: Multi-Party Litigation In Germany: The KapMuG In Action"[URL]
- "Tort reform"[URL]
- Trebilcock, Michael J., "The Law and Economics of Canadian Competition Policy" (2003), University of Toronto Press
- UK, "Private Actions in Competition Law: A Consultation on Options for Reform", ~ (2012)
- Ulen, Thomas, "The economics of class action litigation" (2012)
- White, Lawrence J., "Private Antitrust Litigations: New Evidence" (1988), MIT Press