본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

북한의 주택정책과 이용권제도에 관한 고찰

A study on North Korea's housing policy and rights to use for Housing system

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The housing policy in North Korea provides 1 house to 1 household free of charge. This policy assigns a house to the youths when they hold a job for a set term after completing school or when they get married and provides a ‘right to use for a lifetime’ and collects small usage fees. All of the property within North Korea belongs to the state and sales, lease and security is strictly prohibited. Also, only government, society and cooperative organizations are allowed usage. In the capitalistic countries restricted real right of usufruct and real rights granted by way of security in addition to the ownership is developed but in socialistic countries the state has ownership and the limited right to use is given to a group(organization, corporation etc.). This means that no detailed legislative is needed to strictly manage it because the ownership of the property within North Korea belongs to the state. Comparing the North Korea’s housing system directly with our leasing system has realistic gap and accurately defining it using comparison method is difficult. This is the fruit of the characteristics within the socialistic national policy so there is a need to look at it as a special area similar to the private property right.

Abstract

The housing policy in North Korea provides 1 house to 1 household free of charge. This policy assigns a house to the youths when they hold a job for a set term after completing school or when they get married and provides a ‘right to use for a lifetime’ and collects small usage fees. All of the property within North Korea belongs to the state and sales, lease and security is strictly prohibited. Also, only government, society and cooperative organizations are allowed usage. In the capitalistic countries restricted real right of usufruct and real rights granted by way of security in addition to the ownership is developed but in socialistic countries the state has ownership and the limited right to use is given to a group(organization, corporation etc.). This means that no detailed legislative is needed to strictly manage it because the ownership of the property within North Korea belongs to the state. Comparing the North Korea’s housing system directly with our leasing system has realistic gap and accurately defining it using comparison method is difficult. This is the fruit of the characteristics within the socialistic national policy so there is a need to look at it as a special area similar to the private property right.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 사회과학원 법학연구소, "민사법사전" (1997), 사회과학출판사
  2. 사회과학원 법학연구소, "조선말사전" (2010), 과학백과출판사
  3. 김일성종합대학, "민법학2" (1985), 김일성종합대학출판사
  4. 리기섭, "조선민주주의인민공화국 법률제도(로동법제도)" (1994), 사회과학출판사
  5. 리동구, "부동산가격과 사용료를 바로 제정적용하는 것은 부동산의 효과적 리용을 보장하기 위한 중요요구", 경제연구, (4) (2009)
  6. 장광호, "부동산의 본질과 그 특성", 경제연구, (2) (2008), 과학백과사전출판사
  7. 김광일, "부동산에 대한 통계적연구에서 제기되는 몇가지 방법론적 문제", 경제연구, (3) (2007), 과학백과사전출판사
  8. 박경일, "공화국 민사법률관게에서의 물적재산권에 대한 리해", 정치법률연구, (4) (2009), 과학백과사전출판사
  9. 북한 부동산관리법제와 남북한 협력방안, "손희두", 법제연구원, ~, pp.연구보고 2012-17 (2012)
  10. 김영규, "북한 민법의 공법적 특성과 수용의 한계", 정책연구, (164), pp.167~204 (2010), 국가안보전략연구소
  11. 박종찬, "북한 물권법에 관한 연구", 강원법학, 20 (2005)
  12. 장병일, "북한 주민의 주택 이용관계와 민법상의 임대차계약", 통일정책연구, 20(2), pp.75~97 (2011), 통일연구원
  13. 권은민, "북한의 토지임대제도와 외국인투자", 북한법연구, (12) (2010), 북한법연구회
  14. 박인성, "중국의 공유주택제도 개혁경험에 관한 연구", 국토연논 (1997), 국토연구원
  15. 북한의 사경제부문 연구-사경제 규모, 유통현금 및 민간보유 외화 규모 추정, "박석삼", 한국은행, ~, pp.한은조사연구 2002-3 (2002)
  16. 북한 부패와 인권의 상관성, "김수암", 통일연구원, ~, pp.연구총서 2012-02 (2012)
  17. 김용구, "북한 부동산정책 변화에 관한 연구 : 토지, 주택 및 매대를 중심으로", 석사, 경제ㆍIT(북한학), pp.2010
  18. 수수료·사용료 관련 법제의 정비방안 연구, "강현철", 법제연구원, ~, pp.연구보고 2011-11 (2011)
  19. 馬洪波, "住房利益分配的 矛盾輿協調", 박사, pp.1997
  20. 대법원, "선고 200다25013 판결", ~ (2002)
  21. 대법원, "선고 80다1851,1852 판결", ~ (1980)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)