본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

어휘 풍요도 측정을 위한 관용 표현의 빈도와 분포 연구

A Study of Frequency and Distribution of Lexical Items for the Assessing of Vocabulary Richness

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This study aims to make a practical list of lexical items for the assessing of vocabulary richness. For this, in this study, we extract practical examples from written and spoken corpus to create a practical list. And we aimed to examine their distribution in various text types. Traditional assessing of vocabulary richness mainly deals with words. But this study was carried out to include lexical items in assessing vocabulary. Though we could not present all list of lexical items in the limit of the space, this list will be used to measure vocabulary diversity in future learner outcomes. In this paper, the emergence patterns of idiomatic expressions are compared against the register of written and spoken language, and the distribution of 7 registers of written text and the distribution of 4 registers of spoken text were examined. As a result of the analysis of written corpus, the most diverse types of idioms were used in the novel and quasi – verbal. And The fewest types were used in textbooks. Based on the number of token, literary genres such as novels, essays, and quasi - languages showed high use. In the case of collocation, more types were used in quasi - grammar and essay than in novel. But the number of tokens was often used in the order of novel, quasi-grammar, and essay. The use of idioms in spoken corpus was most widely used in private monologues. The number of tokens of idioms appeared higher in public and private conversations than monologues. The use of collocation was also the most diverse in private monologues, as in idioms, and the number of tokens was greater in monologues than conversations, unlike idioms. It is expected that more meaningful results will be obtained if this inverse study is extended to a more diverse text type.

Abstract

This study aims to make a practical list of lexical items for the assessing of vocabulary richness. For this, in this study, we extract practical examples from written and spoken corpus to create a practical list. And we aimed to examine their distribution in various text types. Traditional assessing of vocabulary richness mainly deals with words. But this study was carried out to include lexical items in assessing vocabulary. Though we could not present all list of lexical items in the limit of the space, this list will be used to measure vocabulary diversity in future learner outcomes. In this paper, the emergence patterns of idiomatic expressions are compared against the register of written and spoken language, and the distribution of 7 registers of written text and the distribution of 4 registers of spoken text were examined. As a result of the analysis of written corpus, the most diverse types of idioms were used in the novel and quasi – verbal. And The fewest types were used in textbooks. Based on the number of token, literary genres such as novels, essays, and quasi - languages showed high use. In the case of collocation, more types were used in quasi - grammar and essay than in novel. But the number of tokens was often used in the order of novel, quasi-grammar, and essay. The use of idioms in spoken corpus was most widely used in private monologues. The number of tokens of idioms appeared higher in public and private conversations than monologues. The use of collocation was also the most diverse in private monologues, as in idioms, and the number of tokens was greater in monologues than conversations, unlike idioms. It is expected that more meaningful results will be obtained if this inverse study is extended to a more diverse text type.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 김하수, "한국어 교육을 위한 한국어 연어사전" (2007), 커뮤니케이션북스
  2. 김한샘, "현대 국어 사용 빈도 조사2" (2005), 국립국어원
  3. 김한샘, "한국어 숙어 연구" (2011), 한국문화사
  4. 배도용, "한국어 학습자 문어 산출물에 나타난 어휘 풍요도 측정을 위해 해결해야 할 몇 가지 문제", 우리말연구, (36), pp.133~156 (2014), 우리말학회[DOI]
  5. 서상규, "한국어 기본어휘 연구" (2013), 한국문화사
  6. 서상규, "한국어 기본어휘 의미빈도 사전" (2014), 한국문화사
  7. 서상규, "한국어 구어 말뭉치 연구" (2013), 한국문화사
  8. 안의정, "한국어 텍스트의 어휘 다양도와 어휘 밀도 분석", 언어사실과 관점, 41, pp.349~365 (2017), 언어정보연구원[DOI]
  9. 언어정보연구원, "연세한국어사전" (1998), 두산동아
  10. 우형식, "한국어 교육을 위한 한국어 어휘의 이해" (2009), 부산외국어대학교 출판부
  11. 이동혁, "한국어 관용 표현의 정보화와 전산 처리" (2007), 역락
  12. 정희정, "『한국어 교육을 위한 한국어 연어 사전』의 편찬", 한국사전학, (10), pp.115~137 (2007), 한국사전학회[DOI]
  13. 한국어 교육 어휘 내용 개발(4단계) 최종보고서, "한송화", 국립국어원, ~ (2015)
  14. Moon, R., "Vocabulary – Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy" (1997), Cambridge
  15. Moon, R., "Fixed expressions and idioms in English : a corpus-based approach" (1998), Clarendon Press ; Oxford University Press
  16. Read, J., "Assessing Vocabulary" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  17. Richard, J., "언어 교육의 접근방법과 교수법" (2017), 케임브리지

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)