본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일제 강점기 동화시(童話詩) 연구

A Study of Fairytale Poems during the Japanese Colonial Period

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

During the Japanese colonial period, a fairytale poem revealed ahybrid genre with a strong experimental spirit which covers both thenarration of fairytales and poetic rhythm. As a part of re-narration offolk tales and classical novels attempted by Choi Nam-seon and LeeGwang-soo in the 1910s, it had been kept alive as a lyric genre inchildren’s literature by few writers prior to national liberation. However, it remained as undeveloped land in a short history. In the early 1920s, Bang Jung-hwan’s efforts to collect ancient fairytales had a significant effect on the creation of children’s stories andproduction of fairy tale writers. During the translation and adaptationof foreign fairy tales, the re-narration of folk tales created traditionalfairy tales. Then, these traditional children’s stories were reborn intofairytale poems according to the writer’s consciousness or children’semotion. In terms of fairytale poem writers, those from the juvenile movementincluding Kim Yeong-hui were active through ‘Jungoe Daily’ in the1920s. They built literary accomplishments through reading forumassociation or fairytale association in each region. In addition, they were able to engage in literary activities through exchange with KAPFwriters. Later, the fairytale poem was led by Yoon Seok-jung and KimTae-oh in the 1930s and Noh Yang-geun, Im In-soo and Lee Jong-sungin the 1940s. Regarding the fairytale poem during the Japanese colonial period, abig difference is found between the 1920s and since the 1930s in termsof its contents and form. In the 1920s, it was usually re-narrated basedon traditional fairytales or fables under 7・5 or 4・4 syllabic rhythm. Inparticular, 7・5 syllabic rhythm was common because it was the rhythmof creative children’s songs as well at that time. Because a fairytalepoem focused on syllabic verse too much, however, poetic license wasintentionally permitted, or the traces of redundant expression werefound to match the tone. In contrast, it was significant in that it omittedbrutal contents for children, and the phases of the times were reflectedat re-narration. Since the 1930s, on the other hand, a fairytale poem started to usecreative fairy tales. In addition, free verse instead of syllabic verse wasadopted. Yoon Seok-jung was the leading figure in this change. Heclearly isolated the circumstance from the 1920s by changing thecontents and form of the fairytale poem regularly. Moreover, thefairytale poem started to use poetic elements such as metaphor orimage more often entering the 1940s. Unfortunately, however, the fairytale poem couldn’t go up to themainstream of children’s literature such as children’s song and fairytale. However, it shouldn’t be overlooked that it pioneered a new fieldin children’s literature with an experimental spirit, brought fun andpleasure to children and played an educational role.

Abstract

During the Japanese colonial period, a fairytale poem revealed ahybrid genre with a strong experimental spirit which covers both thenarration of fairytales and poetic rhythm. As a part of re-narration offolk tales and classical novels attempted by Choi Nam-seon and LeeGwang-soo in the 1910s, it had been kept alive as a lyric genre inchildren’s literature by few writers prior to national liberation. However, it remained as undeveloped land in a short history. In the early 1920s, Bang Jung-hwan’s efforts to collect ancient fairytales had a significant effect on the creation of children’s stories andproduction of fairy tale writers. During the translation and adaptationof foreign fairy tales, the re-narration of folk tales created traditionalfairy tales. Then, these traditional children’s stories were reborn intofairytale poems according to the writer’s consciousness or children’semotion. In terms of fairytale poem writers, those from the juvenile movementincluding Kim Yeong-hui were active through ‘Jungoe Daily’ in the1920s. They built literary accomplishments through reading forumassociation or fairytale association in each region. In addition, they were able to engage in literary activities through exchange with KAPFwriters. Later, the fairytale poem was led by Yoon Seok-jung and KimTae-oh in the 1930s and Noh Yang-geun, Im In-soo and Lee Jong-sungin the 1940s. Regarding the fairytale poem during the Japanese colonial period, abig difference is found between the 1920s and since the 1930s in termsof its contents and form. In the 1920s, it was usually re-narrated basedon traditional fairytales or fables under 7・5 or 4・4 syllabic rhythm. Inparticular, 7・5 syllabic rhythm was common because it was the rhythmof creative children’s songs as well at that time. Because a fairytalepoem focused on syllabic verse too much, however, poetic license wasintentionally permitted, or the traces of redundant expression werefound to match the tone. In contrast, it was significant in that it omittedbrutal contents for children, and the phases of the times were reflectedat re-narration. Since the 1930s, on the other hand, a fairytale poem started to usecreative fairy tales. In addition, free verse instead of syllabic verse wasadopted. Yoon Seok-jung was the leading figure in this change. Heclearly isolated the circumstance from the 1920s by changing thecontents and form of the fairytale poem regularly. Moreover, thefairytale poem started to use poetic elements such as metaphor orimage more often entering the 1940s. Unfortunately, however, the fairytale poem couldn’t go up to themainstream of children’s literature such as children’s song and fairytale. However, it shouldn’t be overlooked that it pioneered a new fieldin children’s literature with an experimental spirit, brought fun andpleasure to children and played an educational role.

참고문헌 (71)

  1. "아이들 보이", ~
  2. "새별", ~
  3. "어린이", ~
  4. "신소년", ~
  5. "아이생활", ~
  6. "개벽", ~
  7. "불별", ~
  8. "음악과시", ~
  9. "동광", ~
  10. "조선문예", ~
  11. "조선지광", ~
  12. "사상월보", ~
  13. "사해공론", ~
  14. "잃어버린 댕기", ~
  15. "설강동요집", ~
  16. "붉은져고리", ~
  17. "매일신보", ~
  18. "중외일보", ~
  19. "조선일보", ~
  20. "동아일보", ~
  21. 권혁준, "雪崗 金泰午 童謠 硏究", 한국아동문학연구, (20), pp.25~68 (2011), 한국아동문학학회
  22. 권혁준, "『아이들보이』의 아동문학사적 의의에 대한 연구", 한국아동문학연구, (22), pp.5~60 (2012), 한국아동문학학회[DOI]
  23. 김 경, "암흑기의 아동문학—주로 「아이생활」을 중심으로", 아동문학평론, (10) (1985), 아동문학평론사
  24. 김미영, "심의린 『조선동화대집』 의 특징과 문학사적 위상", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (58), pp.79~109 (2011), 한민족어문학회
  25. 김제곤, "일제강점기 창작동요의 발전과정—윤석중 동요집을 중심으로", 아동문학평론, 34(3) (2009), 아동문학평론사
  26. 류덕제, "『별나라』와 계급주의 아동문학의 의미", 국어교육연구, (46), pp.305~334 (2010), 국어교육학회(since1969)
  27. 박경수, "일제 강점기 일간지를 통해 본 경남·부산지역 아동문학", 한국문학논총, (37), pp.201~241 (2004), 한국문학회
  28. 박용규, "일제하 민간지 기자집단의 사회적 특성의 변화과정에 관한 연구 : 직업의식과 직업적 특성의 변화를 중심으로", 박사, 신문학, pp.1994
  29. 박용규, "일제하 시대・중외・중앙・조선중앙일보에 관한 연구—창간 배경과 과정, 자본과운영, 편집진의 구성과 특성을 중심으로", 언론과 정보, 2 (1996), 부산대학교 언론정보 연구소
  30. 박태일, "경남지역 계급주의 시문학 연구", 어문학, 80, pp.291~327 (2003), 한국어문학회
  31. 박혜숙, "서양 동화의 流入과 1920년대 한국 동화의 成立", 어문연구(語文硏究), 33(1), pp.173~192 (2005), 한국어문교육연구회
  32. 박혜숙, "한국 근대 아동문단의 민담 수집과 아동문학의 장르 인식", 동화와 번역, (16), pp.189~213 (2008), 동화와번역연구소
  33. 신현득, "한국 근대아동문학 형성과정 연구—최남선의 공적을 중심으로", 국문학논집, 17 (2000), 단국대학교 국어국문학과
  34. 신현득, "한국 동시사 연구", 박사, 현대문학, pp.2002
  35. 염희경, "전래동화, 근대아동문학으로 편입된 옛이야기—방정환을 중심으로", 창비어린이, 통권 : 4 (2004), 창작과비평사
  36. 염희경, "일제 강점기 번역․번안 동화 앤솔러지의 탄생과 번역의 상상력(1)-민족주의 계열과 사회주의 계열의 소년운동 그룹의 번역을 중심으로-", 문학교육학, (39), pp.211~249 (2012), 한국문학교육학회
  37. 원종찬, "한국 아동문학 형성과정 연구 - 「소년」(1908)에서 「어린이」(1923)까지 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(15), pp.73~97 (2008), 동북아시아문화학회
  38. 원종찬, "일제강점기의 동요∙동시론 연구 -한국적 특성에 관한 고찰-", 한국아동문학연구, (20), pp.69~100 (2011), 한국아동문학학회
  39. 원종찬, "1920년대 『별나라』의 위상 - 남북한 주류의 아동문학사 인식 비판 -", 한국아동문학연구, (23), pp.65~104 (2012), 한국아동문학학회
  40. 이동순, "1920년대 동요운동의 전개양상", 한국문학이론과 비평, 15(4), pp.73~94 (2011), 한국문학이론과비평학회
  41. 이석현, "아동문학의 未開地—동화시・시조・동시극・그림동화", 아동문학평론, (34) (2009), 아동문학평론사
  42. 임상석, "『시문독본』의 편찬 과정과 1910년대 최남선의 출판 활동", 상허학보, 25, pp.33~53 (2009), 상허학회
  43. 임성규, "1920년대 계급주의 아동문학 비평 연구—소년문예운동 방향전환론의 전개와 비평사적 의미", 아동청소년문학연구, 3 (2008), 한국아동청소년문학학회
  44. 임지연, "한국 근대 아동극 장르의 용어와 개념 고찰", 아동청소년문학연구, 5 (2009), 한국아동청소년문학학회
  45. 정진헌, "일제 강점기 한국 창작동요 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.2013
  46. 정혜원, "1910년대 아동매체에 구현된 아동상 연구—번안동화를 중심으로", 한국아동문학연구, 15 (2008), 한국아동문학학회
  47. 제해만, "현대동시—-동시의 갈래", 아동문학평론, (11) (1986), 아동문학평론사
  48. 조은숙, "식민지시기 ‘동화회(童話會)’ 연구 - 공동체적 독서에서 독서의 공동체로 -", 민족문화연구, (45), pp.225~264 (2006), 민족문화연구원
  49. 진선희, "1910년대 아동 신문『붉은 져고리』 연구 - 수록 동요를 중심으로", 한국아동문학연구, (22), pp.123~169 (2012), 한국아동문학학회[DOI]
  50. 최명표, "전북 지역 아동문학연구" (2010), 청동거울
  51. 최명표, "박두언의 사회운동과 문학운동", 한국지역문학연구, 1 (2012), 한국지역문학회
  52. 최윤정, "근대 아동 독자의 형성과정 연구", 동화와 번역, (25), pp.275~299 (2013), 동화와번역연구소
  53. 최윤정, "우리 옛이야기, 그 탈주-담론의 심층사회학 - 1920년대 『조선동화대집』을 중심으로", 한국문학이론과 비평, 17(1), pp.287~314 (2013), 한국문학이론과비평학회
  54. 권혁래, "조선동화집" (2003), 집문당
  55. 김봉희, "계급문학, 그 중심에 서서" (2009), 한국학술정보
  56. 김윤식, "육당이 이 땅에 오신 지 백주년" (1990), 동명사
  57. 김준오, "시론" (2002), 삼지원
  58. 최명표, "노양근 동화선집" (2013), 지식을만드는지식
  59. 박영기, "아동문학 프리즘" (2011), 청동거울
  60. 박영만, "조선전래동화집" (1940), 대동인쇄소
  61. 신원기, "조선전래동화대집" (2009), 보고사
  62. 서정오, "옛이야기 들려주기" (2002), 보리
  63. 유종호, "다시 읽는 한국 시인" (2002), 문학동네
  64. 윤석중, "어린이와 한평생" (1978), 범양사
  65. 이재철, "한국현대아동문학사" (1978), 일지사
  66. 이재철, "아동문학개론" (1998), 서문당
  67. 조동일, "한국문학의 갈래 이론" (1992), 집문당
  68. 조동화, "이솝우화집" (1977), 샘터사
  69. 최남선, "최남선전집", pp.10~ (1973), 현암사
  70. 최인자, "국어교육론의 문화론적 지평" (2001), 소명출판
  71. 페리노들먼, "어린이 문학의 즐거움 2" (2005), 시공주니어

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)