청대 고증학의 개조 황종희 - 科擧之學 비판과 經學 제창을 중심으로 -
Huang Zongxi(黃宗羲), Originator of the evidential research(考證學) in Qing dynasty : focused on criticism of learning for the civil service examination(科擧之學) and advocacy of classical studies(經學)
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
明末淸初는 중국의 학술사에서 커다란 전환이 일어난 시기이다. 이 시기를 거치면서 宋明 理學이 쇠퇴하고 淸代 考證學이 등장한다. 이 학술사적 전환, 전통적인 표현을 빌리면 宋學에서 漢學으로의 전환이 왜 일어나게 되었는가, 라는 문제에 관한 청대의 논의 가운데 유력한 견해는 科擧를 위한 학문(科擧之學)에 대한 반성에서 漢學이 일어나게 되었다고 하는 것이었다. 이 글에서는 이러한 고증학 부흥에 관한 청대의 논의에서 출발하여 科擧之學 비판, 經學 제창의 움직임이 淸初에 어떠한 형태로 나타나고 있는가에 관해 살펴보았다. 구체적으로는 고증학의 개조로서 평가받는 黃宗羲에 초점을 맞춰 그의 수험용 참고서인 四書講章에 대한 평가, 科擧之學의 경학적 입장에 대한 평가, 그리고 講學 活動 등을 검토하였다. 이를 통해 황종희가 과거지학으로 인해 四書講章이 유행하고, ‘한 선생의 말씀’만을 추종하는 태도가 만연하는 가운데 경학이 망해 버렸다고 비판하였으며, 明末의 文社와 淸初의 學風에 대한 반성에서 경학을 모든 학문의 근본으로 삼아야 한다고 주장하면서 이를 講學에서 실천하였다는 점을 밝혔다. 그리고 이러한 황종희의 과거지학 비판, 경학 제창이 청초에 고증학이 일어나게 되는 데 선구적인 역할을 수행하였음을 논하였다.
Abstract
Late Ming and early Qing was a period when there happened great transition in intellectual history of China. Through the period, Song Ming lixue(宋明理學, the learning of principle) had continued to decline while evidential research(考證學) in Qing dynasty began to appear. Why did such intellectual transition, that is, transition from Song Learning(宋學) to Han Learning(漢學) in traditional expression, take place? The most persuasive opinion among discussions in Qing dynasty on this question is that Han Learning(漢學) began to appear from reflection on learning for the civil service examination. This study started from discussion about revival of evidential research in Qing dynasty, and then, investigated on in what form criticism of learning for the civil service examination and movement of advocacy of classical studies appeared. Specifically, this study focused on Huang Zongxi(黃宗羲), originator of evidential research(考證學) in Qing dynasty. For this, commentaries on the Four Books(四書講章) which is a reference book for examination was evaluated; position of classical studies of learning for the civil service examination was assessed; and teaching activities, especially The Classics Discussion Society(講經會) were reviewed. Through this, Huang Zongxi criticized that commentaries on the Four Books became popular because of learning for the civil service examination and attitude to follow ‘words of one teacher(一先生之語)’ was widely spread, as a result, classical studies declined. He asserted that classical studies should be foundation of all academic studies from the reflection on Wenshe(文社, literary society) in late Ming and academic trend in early Qing. Furthermore, he figured out that he implemented this in teaching activities. This study showed that such criticism of learning for the civil service examination and advocacy of classical studies by Huang Zongxi played a role of a pioneer in revival of Evidential research in Qing dynasty.
참고문헌 (31)
- 黃宗羲, "黃宗羲全集" (2005), 浙江古籍出版社
- 黃宗羲, "南雷文案", 四部叢刊本
- 黃宗羲, "南雷文定", 四部備要本
- 黃宗羲, "明儒學案" (2008), 中華書局
- 江藩, "國朝漢學師承記" (1983), 中華書局
- 顧炎武, "日知錄集釋, In 日知錄集釋" (2006), 上海古籍出版社
- 眉史氏, "復社姓氏校錄附復社紀略" (1993), 東方學報
- 呂留良, "呂晩村文集" (1973), 商務印書館
- 張溥, "七錄齋詩文合集" (1977), 偉文圖書公司
- 全祖望, "鮚埼亭集, In 全祖望集彙校集注" (2000), 上海古籍出版社
- 皮錫瑞, "經學歷史" (1959), 中華書局
- 黃百家, "學箕初稿", 四部叢刊本
- 黃炳垕, "黃宗羲年譜(原題, 黃梨洲先生年譜)" (1993), 中華書局
- "明史" (1974), 中華書局
- "四庫全書總目" (1997), 中華書局
- 宮崎市定, "張溥とその時代—明末における一鄕紳の生涯—, In 宮崎市定全集" (1992), 岩波書店
- 吉川幸次郞, "錢謙益と淸朝「經學」, In 吉川幸次郞全集" (1970), 筑摩書房
- 吉川幸次郞, "中國文學史稿, In 吉川幸次郞遺稿集2" (1996), 筑摩書房
- 馬淵昌也, "劉宗周から陳確へ宋明理学から清代儒教への転換の一様相", 日本中國国會報, 53 (2001)
- 小島毅, "地域から思想史, In 交錯するアジア" (1993), 東京大学出版會
- 小野和子, "黃宗羲の前半生", 東方學報, 34 (1964)
- 小野和子, "淸初の講經會について", 東方學報, 36 (1964)
- 小野和子, "明季黨社考—東林黨と復社" (1996), 同朋社
- 井上進, "復社の學", 東洋史研究, 44(2) (1985)
- 井上進, "顧炎武", 白帝社 (1994)
- 佐野公治, "四書學史の研究" (1998), 創文社
- 荒木見悟, "道統論の衰退と新儒林伝の展開, In 明淸思想論考" (1992), 硏文出版
- 梁啓超, "淸代學術槪論" (1921), 商務印書館
- 錢穆, "中國近三百年學術史" (1997), 商務印書館
- 朱義祿, "黃宗羲對科擧制度的批判—兼論黃宗羲的學術民主思想, In 黃宗羲與明淸思想" (2006), 上海古籍出版社
- 楊自平, "論林希元《易經存疑》的義理發揮與致用思想", 中國文哲研究集刊, 32 (2008)
