본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

王夫之의 杜甫 비판과 그 詩學 논리

Wang Fuzi’s Critique of Du Fu and Its Aesthetic Logic

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This paper explores the poetic theory of Wang Fuzi[王夫之]’s criticism of Du Fu[杜甫], which is one of the core problems of Wang Fuzi’s poetry, and why Wang Fuzi harshly criticized Du Fu. This paper presents Wang Fuzi’s criticism of Du Fu in five aspects and traces Wang Fuzi’s aesthetic logic in each aspect. Du Fu’s critique of delinquency can be drawn from Wang Fuzi’s own experience of the destruction of his country, and becomes clear when contrasted with Qu Yuan[屈原]’s spirit. Criticism of ‘the history of poetry’[詩史] clarifies the division between literary and non-literary, and we can know the fact that everything from the theory of human nature to the concrete work analysis was carried out in order to establish the literary characteristics of poetry. Criticism of the creative technique of Du Fu’s poems arises mainly from the vocal and lexical refinement and prose elements, but from the recognition that these degrade the poetry to human manipulation, the ‘dead law’[死法] is replaced by ‘lawless’[非法] was made to convert to. Criticism of ‘Learning Du Fu’[學杜] points out that Du Fu is the opposite of authority, that the strong points of Du Fu are not learned, and only the short points of Du Fu are blindly learned, correcting the mock poetry style of the Ming dynasty poetry circle. Criticism of theme and style provides an insight into the history of ‘the collective emotional’[集團情感], which originally unified ‘the teachings of the poetry’[詩敎] and ‘the meanings of the classics’[經義], and descended to the Ming Dynasty. In this process, Du Fu’s poem played a decisive role in the fall of poetry. This determines the rise and fall of a country and the nature of civilization, and Wang Fuzi has a sense of mission to correct ‘the collective emotional’ order[集團的 情感의 矯正] and ‘reconstructing the civilization history of emotions’[情感의 文明史的 再構築]. In the end, Wang Fuzi’s critique of Du Fu reveals the fact that it consists of alternative ideas in a wide range of fields, from the literary independence of poetry to the salvation of civilization. Even if Wang Fuzi’s criticism of Du Fu is harsh and radical, it never has a simple impression or emotional criticism, and tries to confirm the fact that it was made within a relatively general and structural point of view.

Abstract

This paper explores the poetic theory of Wang Fuzi[王夫之]’s criticism of Du Fu[杜甫], which is one of the core problems of Wang Fuzi’s poetry, and why Wang Fuzi harshly criticized Du Fu. This paper presents Wang Fuzi’s criticism of Du Fu in five aspects and traces Wang Fuzi’s aesthetic logic in each aspect. Du Fu’s critique of delinquency can be drawn from Wang Fuzi’s own experience of the destruction of his country, and becomes clear when contrasted with Qu Yuan[屈原]’s spirit. Criticism of ‘the history of poetry’[詩史] clarifies the division between literary and non-literary, and we can know the fact that everything from the theory of human nature to the concrete work analysis was carried out in order to establish the literary characteristics of poetry. Criticism of the creative technique of Du Fu’s poems arises mainly from the vocal and lexical refinement and prose elements, but from the recognition that these degrade the poetry to human manipulation, the ‘dead law’[死法] is replaced by ‘lawless’[非法] was made to convert to. Criticism of ‘Learning Du Fu’[學杜] points out that Du Fu is the opposite of authority, that the strong points of Du Fu are not learned, and only the short points of Du Fu are blindly learned, correcting the mock poetry style of the Ming dynasty poetry circle. Criticism of theme and style provides an insight into the history of ‘the collective emotional’[集團情感], which originally unified ‘the teachings of the poetry’[詩敎] and ‘the meanings of the classics’[經義], and descended to the Ming Dynasty. In this process, Du Fu’s poem played a decisive role in the fall of poetry. This determines the rise and fall of a country and the nature of civilization, and Wang Fuzi has a sense of mission to correct ‘the collective emotional’ order[集團的 情感의 矯正] and ‘reconstructing the civilization history of emotions’[情感의 文明史的 再構築]. In the end, Wang Fuzi’s critique of Du Fu reveals the fact that it consists of alternative ideas in a wide range of fields, from the literary independence of poetry to the salvation of civilization. Even if Wang Fuzi’s criticism of Du Fu is harsh and radical, it never has a simple impression or emotional criticism, and tries to confirm the fact that it was made within a relatively general and structural point of view.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 王夫之, "古詩評選" (1997), 文化藝術出版社
  2. 王夫之, "唐詩評選" (1997), 文化藝術出版社
  3. 王夫之, "明詩評選" (1997), 文化藝術出版社
  4. 王夫之, "薑齋詩話" (1961), 人民文學出版社
  5. 王夫之, "≪船山全書≫ 第三冊" (1992), 岳麓書社
  6. 王夫之, "楚辭通釋" (1959), 中華書局
  7. 孟棨, "≪歷代詩話續編≫ 上冊" (1983), 中華書局
  8. 傅璇琮, "唐人選唐詩新編" (1996), 陝西人民敎育出版社
  9. 蘇軾, "蘇軾文集" (1986), 中華書局
  10. 朱熹, "朱子語類" (1986), 中華書局
  11. 楊愼, "升庵詩話箋證" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
  12. 仇兆鰲, "杜詩詳注" (1979), 中華書局
  13. 周勛初, "唐人軼事彙編" (1995), 上海古籍出版社
  14. 簡恩定, "淸初杜詩學硏究" (1986), 文史哲出版社
  15. 趙成千, "王夫之의 杜甫 시가창작에 대한 비평론", 중국어문논총, (37), pp.145~168 (2008), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
  16. 서성, "王夫之 시론 중의 ‘現量’과 ‘詩的 想像’의 관계 고찰", 중국문화연구, (54), pp.1~27 (2021), 중국문화연구학회[DOI]
  17. 蕭馳, "抒情傳統與中國思想― 王夫之詩學發微" (2003), 上海古籍出版社
  18. 孟澤, "船山的‘英雄美學’及其對詩史的苛評", 湘潭大學社會科學學報, (5) (2000)
  19. 鄔國平, "王夫之評杜甫論", 杜甫硏究學刊, (1) (2001)
  20. 蔣寅, "杜甫是偉大詩人嗎—歷代貶杜的譜系", 國學學刊, (3) (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)