본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

우리나라 다태아 출생률 추이에 관한 연구: 1981–2017

Secular Trends of Multiple Birth Rate in Korea: 1981–2017

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: To determine the secular trend of the multiple birth rate in Korea from 1981 to 2017. Methods: This study used birth certificate data covering the years 1981–2017 (20,948,901 births), provided by Statistics Korea. The impact of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) on multiple birth was analyzed by examining data prior to and after the introduction of ART and the national support program for infertile couples in South Korea. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to describe the secular trend in the multiple birth rate per 100 births. Results: During this period, the multiple birth rate per 100 births increased by 277 percent from 1.031 to 3.891, the twin birth rate increased from 1.013 to 3.807 (275%), and the triplet birth rate increased from 0.018 to 0.084 (363%). The secular trend of the multiple birth rate remained in the 1.000 level during 1981–1991, but has been rising steadily since 1992. The average increment of the multiple birth rate was 3.9% annually from 1981 through 2017 (peaking at more than 10 percent during 2006–2007). Prior to the introduction of ART in Korea (1981–1984), the multiple birth rate was 1.007, but after its introduction, the multiple birth rate was 1.005 in 1985–1989 (OR, 0.998; 95% confidence interval, 0.982–1.014), 1.084 in 1990–1994 (1.007; 1.060–1.094), 1.891 in 2000–2004 (1.894; 1.866–1.922), 3.127 in 2010–2014 (3.173; 3.129–3.217), and 3.811 in 2015–2017 (3.893; 3.835–3.952). Conclusion: Over the past three decades, multiple births have risen dramatically in Korea, primarily due to the increasingly widespread use of fertility therapies, and the delayed age of childbearing. There is a need for more research to understand the factors contributing to multiple births, and the national birth registration systems ought to be reformed to monitor whether multiple births originated spontaneously or from assisted-conception.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the secular trend of the multiple birth rate in Korea from 1981 to 2017. Methods: This study used birth certificate data covering the years 1981–2017 (20,948,901 births), provided by Statistics Korea. The impact of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) on multiple birth was analyzed by examining data prior to and after the introduction of ART and the national support program for infertile couples in South Korea. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to describe the secular trend in the multiple birth rate per 100 births. Results: During this period, the multiple birth rate per 100 births increased by 277 percent from 1.031 to 3.891, the twin birth rate increased from 1.013 to 3.807 (275%), and the triplet birth rate increased from 0.018 to 0.084 (363%). The secular trend of the multiple birth rate remained in the 1.000 level during 1981–1991, but has been rising steadily since 1992. The average increment of the multiple birth rate was 3.9% annually from 1981 through 2017 (peaking at more than 10 percent during 2006–2007). Prior to the introduction of ART in Korea (1981–1984), the multiple birth rate was 1.007, but after its introduction, the multiple birth rate was 1.005 in 1985–1989 (OR, 0.998; 95% confidence interval, 0.982–1.014), 1.084 in 1990–1994 (1.007; 1.060–1.094), 1.891 in 2000–2004 (1.894; 1.866–1.922), 3.127 in 2010–2014 (3.173; 3.129–3.217), and 3.811 in 2015–2017 (3.893; 3.835–3.952). Conclusion: Over the past three decades, multiple births have risen dramatically in Korea, primarily due to the increasingly widespread use of fertility therapies, and the delayed age of childbearing. There is a need for more research to understand the factors contributing to multiple births, and the national birth registration systems ought to be reformed to monitor whether multiple births originated spontaneously or from assisted-conception.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Blondel B, "Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births", Semin Perinatol, 26, pp.239~249 (2002)
  2. Chambers GM, "Hospital costs of multiple-birth and singleton-birth children during the first 5 years of life and the role of assisted eproductive technology", JAMA Pediatr, 168, pp.1045~1053 (2014)
  3. Chambers GM, "What can we learn from a decade of promoting safe embryo transfer practices? A comparative analysis of policies and outcomes in the UK and Australia, 2001-2010", Hum Reprod, 28, pp.1679~1686 (2013)
  4. Chandra A, "Infertility service use among U.S. women: 1995 and 2002", Fertil Steril, 93, pp.725~736 (2010)
  5. Collins J., "Global epidemiology of multiple birth", Reprod Biomed Online, 15(Suppl 3), pp.45~52 (2007)
  6. Committee for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Statistics, Korean Society for Assisted Reproduction, "Current status of assisted reproductive technology in Korea", Clin Exp Reprod Med, 43, pp.38~43 (2016)
  7. Delnord M, "What contributes to disparities in the preterm birth rate in European countries?", Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 27, pp.133~142 (2015)
  8. Eriksson AW, "Temporal trends in the rates of multiple maternities in England and Wales", Twin Res Hum Genet, 10, pp.626~632 (2007)
  9. Hamilton BE, "Births : final data for 2014", Natl Vital Stat Rep, 64, pp.1~64 (2015)
  10. Hur YM, "Changes in twinning rates in South Korea: 1981-2002", Twin Res Hum Genet, 8, pp.76~79 (2005)
  11. Analysis and evaluation of the results of national supporting program for infertile couples in 2014, "Hwang NM", Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, 19~39 (2015)
  12. Analysis and evaluation of the results of national supporting program for infertile couples in 2012, "Hwang NM", Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, ~ (2013)
  13. Analysis and evaluation of the results of national supporting program for infertile couples in 2016, "Hwang NM", Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, 4~26 (2017)
  14. Ko HS, "Multiple birth rates of Korea and fetal", neonatal, PLoS One, pp.2018, 13[DOI]
  15. Luke B, "The rise in multiple births in the United States : who, what, when, where, and why", Clin Obstet Gynecol, 47, pp.118~133 (2004)
  16. Martin JA, "Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980-2009", NCHS Data Brief, 80, pp.1~8 (2012)
  17. Martin JA, "Births : final data for 2009", Natl Vital Stat Rep, 60, pp.1~70 (2011)
  18. Martin JA, "Trends in twin and triplet births : 1980-97", Natl Vital Stat Rep, 47, pp.1~16 (1999)
  19. "Microdata Integrated Service"[URL]
  20. National supporting program for infertile couples. Guideline for 2016 Maternal and Childe Health Services, "Ministry of Health and Welfare", Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare, 135~161 (2016)
  21. Murray SR, "Multiple pregnancies following assisted reproductive technologies--a happy consequence or double trouble?", Semin Fetal Neonatal Med, 19, pp.222~227 (2014)
  22. 박상화, "출산 연령에 따른 출생아의 출생 결과; 1997-98, 2014-15년 출생통계를 중심으로", 보건정보통계학회지, 42(3), pp.294~300 (2017), 한국보건정보통계학회[DOI]
  23. Park SH, "Study on Trends of Multiple Birth in Korea : 1982-1998", Korean J Perinatol, 12, pp.449~452 (2001)
  24. Park SH, "Contribution of maternal age distribution to incidence of multiple birth rate; 1997-99 and 2011-13", J Reprod Med Popul, 28, pp.96~102 (2015)
  25. Reynolds MA, "Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997-2000", Pediatrics, 111(5 Pt 2), pp.1159~1162 (2003)
  26. Scholten I, "Impact of assisted reproductive technology on the incidence of multiplegestation infants : a population perspective", Fertil Steril, 103, pp.179~183 (2015)
  27. Tandberg A, "Increasing twinning rates in Norway, 1967-2004 : the influence of maternal age and assisted reproductive technology(ART)", Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 86, pp.833~839 (2007)
  28. Wright VC, "Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2004", MMWR Surveill Summ, 56, pp.1~22 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)