본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신재생에너지의 확산이 대기오염 배출 저감에 미치는 영향 분석

Analysis on Impacts of Renewable Energy Promotion on Mitigation of Air Pollution

정서림|배정환
한국신·재생에너지학회 (The Korean Society for New and Renewable Energy)|2020.09|신재생에너지 (New & Renewable Energy)|제16권 제3호|pp. 13-26|DOI 10.7849/ksnre.2020.0013

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

PM2.5대기오염물질Air pollutants신재생에너지New and renewable energy초미세먼지환경쿠즈네츠곡선Environmental Kuznets curve

초록

This study analyzed whether the diffusion of new and renewable energy contributed to mitigating emissions of various air pollutants, including particulate matter, using panel econometric models. The theoretical foundation of such econometric models is based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis, which assumes an inverted U-shaped relation between national income and environmental pollution, as originally proposed by Grossman and Krueger. We examined whether there are inverted U-, U-shaped, or N-shaped relations between national income and air pollution. We demonstrate that increases in new and renewable energy significantly mitigated emissions of CO, NOX, and PM2.5. Additionally, we included NOX, SOX, PM10, and VOCs as secondary emission sources of PM2.5 and found that emission of PM10 resulted in the highest PM2.5 emissions, followed by NOX and SOX emissions. The impact of new and renewable energy on air pollution varied across regions. Increase of new and renewable energy in the Honam region significantly mitigated CO, NOX, and TSP emissions, while that in the Youngnam and metropolitan areas did not significantly mitigate air pollution overall. There was a U-shaped relationship between air pollution and national income for CO, NOX, PM2.5, and SOX, while an inverted N-shape was observed for PM10.

Abstract

This study analyzed whether the diffusion of new and renewable energy contributed to mitigating emissions of various air pollutants, including particulate matter, using panel econometric models. The theoretical foundation of such econometric models is based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis, which assumes an inverted U-shaped relation between national income and environmental pollution, as originally proposed by Grossman and Krueger. We examined whether there are inverted U-, U-shaped, or N-shaped relations between national income and air pollution. We demonstrate that increases in new and renewable energy significantly mitigated emissions of CO, NOX, and PM2.5. Additionally, we included NOX, SOX, PM10, and VOCs as secondary emission sources of PM2.5 and found that emission of PM10 resulted in the highest PM2.5 emissions, followed by NOX and SOX emissions. The impact of new and renewable energy on air pollution varied across regions. Increase of new and renewable energy in the Honam region significantly mitigated CO, NOX, and TSP emissions, while that in the Youngnam and metropolitan areas did not significantly mitigate air pollution overall. There was a U-shaped relationship between air pollution and national income for CO, NOX, PM2.5, and SOX, while an inverted N-shape was observed for PM10.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. "Second basic plan on the metropolitan area air quality management (2015-2024)" (2013)[URL]
  2. In-depth evaluation for particulate matter mitigation policies (Final report), "Korea Institute of Public Finance", ~ (2019)
  3. Grossman, G. M., "Economic growth and the environment", Q. J. Econ, 110(2), pp.353~377 (1995)
  4. Alvarez-Herranz, A., "Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels", Energy Policy, 105, pp.386~397 (2017)
  5. Moomaw, W. R., "“Are environmental Kuznets curves misleading us?” The case of CO2 emission", Environ. Dev. Econ, 2(4), pp.451~463 (1997)
  6. Selden, T., "Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets Curve for air pollution emissions?", J. Environ. Econ. Manag, 27(2), pp.147~162 (1994)
  7. Economic growth and environmental quality: time-series and crosscountry evidence, "Shafik, N.", World Bank, 1~6, pp.Working Papers, 904 (1992)
  8. Torras, M., "Income, inequality, and pollution : a reassessment of the Environmental Kuznets Curve", Ecol. Econ, 25(2), pp.147~160 (1998)
  9. Fisher-Vanden, K., "What is driving China’s decline in energy intensity?", Resour. Energy Econ, 26(1), pp.77~97 (2004)
  10. 배정환, "생산함수 접근법을 이용한 온실가스 배출 결정요인 분석", 응용경제, 14(3), pp.107~132 (2012), 한국응용경제학회
  11. 이광훈, "국내 지역별 이산화탄소 배출에 대한 환경 쿠즈네츠 곡선 추정 및 비교", 환경정책연구, 9(4), pp.53~76 (2010), 한국환경연구원[DOI]
  12. 이광훈, "수도권 지역 이산화탄소 배출에 대한 환경 쿠즈네츠 곡선 탐색 및 정책적 함의", 서울도시연구, 10(3), pp.83~95 (2009), 서울연구원[DOI]
  13. Implication and analysis on determinants of CO2 emission per capita for major countries, "Kim, W.", KIET, 41~53 (2011)
  14. 문권순, "RegARIMA모형을 이용한 명절효과의 검정에 관한 연구", 통계연구, 10(2), pp.119~145 (2005), 통계청
  15. Cole, M. A., "Corruption, income, and the environment:An empirical analysis", Ecol. Econ, 62(3-4), pp.637~647 (2007)
  16. Leitao, A., "Corruption and the environmental Kuznets curve : Empirical evidence for sulfur", Ecol. Econ, 69(11), pp.2191~2201 (2010)
  17. 배정환, "우리나라 대기오염배출 원인과 저감 정책 효과 분석", 자원환경경제연구, 25(4), pp.545~564 (2016), 한국환경경제학회[DOI]
  18. Hauer, G., "Trade-environment linkages in the resolution of transboundary externalities", World Econ, 22(1), pp.25~39 (1999)
  19. Aslanidis, N., "Smooth transition pollution-income paths", Ecol. Econ, 57(2), pp.182~189 (2006)
  20. Aslanidis, N., "Environment and development : is there a Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions", Appl. Econ, 41(6), pp.803~810 (2009)
  21. Galeotti, M., "On the robustness of robustness of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis", Environ. Resour. Econ, 42(4), pp.551~574 (2009)
  22. Galeotti, M., "Reassessing the environmental kuznets curve for CO2 emissions : A robustness exercise", Ecol. Econ, 57(1), pp.152~163 (2006)
  23. 노건기, "한국의 경제성장, 전력소비, CO2배출 간 인과관계 분석", 신재생에너지, 12, pp.34~41 (2016), 한국신·재생에너지학회
  24. Apergis, N., "Renewable energy, output, carbon dioxide emissions, and oil prices : evidence from South America", Energy Sources Part B : Econ. Plan. Policy, 10(3), pp.281~287 (2015)
  25. Dogan, E., "Determinants of CO2emissions in the European Union : the role of renewable and non-renewable energy", Renew. Energy, 94, pp.429~439 (2016)
  26. Lorente, D., "La innovación y la sustitución energética como medidas de corrección medioambiental en países de la OCDE", Estud. Econ, 34, pp.235~260 (2016)
  27. Impacts of renewable energy on air pollutant emissions, "Moorkens, I.", European Topic Centre on Climate Change Mitigation and Energy, 7~80 (2019)
  28. "Regional Income" (2019)[URL]
  29. "Department of Regional Statistics, Statistics Korea"[URL]
  30. "Consumer price survey"[URL]
  31. "Population projections by province:2015-2045"[URL]
  32. "Yearbook of Regional Energy Statistics 2018" (2018)[URL]
  33. "Total registered moter vehicles"[URL]
  34. "Survey on deployment of new & renewable energy"[URL]
  35. "Status of natural gas vehicle supply"[URL]
  36. "Meteorological dana open portal-Climatic statistical analysis - Climatic analysis -multiple point statistics"[URL]
  37. Min, I.S., "Advanced panel data analysis STATA" (2012), JIPHIL MEDIA

관련 논문AI추천

신재생에너지 발전이 우리나라 CO2 배출에 미치는 영향분석김재화, 김현석재단법인 에너지경제연구원 · 에너지경제연구2015 · 제14권 제3호환경 쿠즈네츠 곡선을 활용한 대기오염 배출량의 오일 가격 탄력성과 사회적비용 탄력성 추정김용빈재단법인 에너지경제연구원 · 에너지경제연구2015 · 제14권 제3호패널분석을 이용한 6대 권역별 대기오염물질에 대한 환경규제와 경제성장 간의 상호관계분석: EKC(환경쿠즈네츠곡선)가설을 중심으로박추환한국환경연구원 · 환경정책연구2013 · 제12권 제2호신·재생에너지원별 온실가스 감축에 미치는 영향 분석 - 태양광과 풍력을 중심으로-강주영, 이기배한국신·재생에너지학회 · 신재생에너지2025 · 제21권 제2호신재생에너지 생산이 경제성장과 CO2 배출량에 미친 영향 분석: OECD 국가를 중심으로강현수경영경제연구소 · 경영경제연구2022 · 제44권 제3호바이오중유발전의 대기오염물질 저감효과와 사회적 편익김하나, 서형주, 전의찬한국신·재생에너지학회 · 신재생에너지2019 · 제15권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)

Analysis of Cell to Module Loss Factor for Shingled PV ModuleSanchari Chowdhury, 이준신, 조영현, 김영국, 조은철pp. 1-12매립가스의 에너지회수 및 표면발산을 고려한 매립장 온실가스 배출 평가이용현, 천승규, 권용재pp. 27-34해상풍력단지 개발을 위한 부유식 라이다 검증경남호, 김홍우, 이진재, 안유옥, 김성완, 이광세, 강승진pp. 35-41
원문 보기